|
|
[求助]
投过Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics帮忙看一句审稿意见,金币感谢
审稿人的意见:The authors have compared their results for m-HfO2 with the same for m-Zirconia; and their similarity was pointed out. But from the above table we can see, for example, that the constant C11 for HfO2 as obtained within LDA-TM and within GGA-TM, became maximal and minimal - as compared with the same constant for zirconia. What should be trusted? This point should be discussed.
我不太明白审稿人的意见?这里的maximal 和minimal, 是不是最大值,最小值的意思,但明明是LDA-HGH的值是最大的呀?求解释,金币感谢
|
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
某top大学教授说“能够在市场中兑现的能力才是真能力”无比同意!
已经有13人回复
同一个分子,一条来自文献,一条来自AI——不告诉你答案,你会选哪条?
已经有7人回复
售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
|