24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

bill08

金虫 (小有名气)

应助: 18 (小学生)
金币: 1044
散金: 12
红花: 1
帖子: 214
在线: 141.5小时
虫号: 1430895
注册: 2011-10-08
专业: 水文、水资源

[求助] 小虫含泪散币：编辑说我页数超了，我Responses这样抗诉，会不会惹怒编辑。。。求助~~

我的情况是这样的，页数超了，但是我核对后发觉基本没有超：manuscript转化为印刷排版估计就11页，而这个杂志发的文章基本是8-12页的。

详见上一帖子http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=3865322

这是技术审查编辑的意见，
Please note that the length of the manuscript including captions, figures, and tables should not exceed 22 double line-spaced pages.

我实在是版面精简不下来了，以下是我的抗诉回复：

We have tried our best to reduce the length of this manuscript. However, the content of this manuscript is abundant and we find it is difficult to reduce to 22 double line-spaced manuscript pages. We thought that the page requirement in the Guide for Authors, i.e. “Research Papers should not exceed 22 printed pages”, refers to the printed journal pages rather than the manuscript pages. The printed journal pages are much less than the corresponding manuscript pages. Besides, the word count of this manuscript including captions, figures, tables and references is about 8000, which is almost equal to the word count of some recent published papers with 9 or 10 printed journal pages. Hence we believe that this manuscript will not exceed 10 printed journal pages and the number of pages will not be an obstacle to publish this manuscript. Thank you for your understanding.
请大家伙儿帮我看看，这样写在“Technical Check Results”合适不合适？
有木有哪儿可以改的委婉一些的，小虫还是有点怕再次被打回来，并且激怒编辑啊。。。