24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

zhouru0001

银虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 430.8
帖子: 78
在线: 33.6小时
虫号: 1309822

[交流] 被拒，请教虫友

投了期刊后昨天得到回复被拒

。倒也不是第一次被拒文章，但是看了reviewer的command感觉晕乎乎的。

reviewer A让我试验部分再加点其它related work的实验数据，说白了就是再加两条曲线。
reviewer B写了4条：
1。指出两个语法错误
2. 让我点名两个参数的具体数值是多少
3. 有一个曲线我当时觉得不是太重要没加上让我也画上
4. 咨询我有一个数值具体是多少。

个人觉得没有对主题思想提出质疑。编辑连大修都没给直接拒了，说评委们认为文章不符合标准。说实话俺投文章这样的review commnads属于不错的了

，以前比这骂的更难听的有的是

，但是咋直接拒了呢？莫非真是期刊的文章早就满了？

最郁闷的是老板不让改投别期刊，非说：“失败是成功他妈”
我担心要是人家本身不想要文章的话再投是不是浪费时间呢？

求教各位虫友。先谢过。

后文：
教授命令俺发邮件问期刊如果重投是否还是以前的reviewer审，这样是不是能快点。两天后人家回复说：
“The Associate Editor has reviewed your email below and has determined that he will stay with his decision to decline your manuscript for publication in Optical Engineering. His decision to decline your manuscript was based both on the reviewer comments and his personal review/assessment of your manuscript.

The Associate Editor's recommendation is that if you choose to have this paper reconsidered, it will need to be as a new submission with new reviewers. He recommends you take serious steps to improve your paper's overall quality beyond the specific issues identified by the reviewers. We wish you the best of luck with improving your manuscript if you choose to do so.”
感觉像是又被日了一次，可是编辑所指的“ take serious steps”具体是啥他也没说，总之感觉确实像虫友说的是被编辑给拒了。

[ Last edited by zhouru0001 on 2011-11-24 at 13:25 ]

回复此楼