| ²é¿´: 876 | »Ø¸´: 1 | ||
| ±¾Ìû²úÉú 1 ¸ö ·ÒëEPI £¬µã»÷ÕâÀï½øÐв鿴 | ||
ydd1982ͳæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[ÇóÖú]
PGPR´Ù½ø×÷ÓÃÑо¿ÂÛÎÄ·Òë Ó¢Ò뺺
|
|
|
3¡¢The effect of the five isolates in our study was then observed in pot trials using chickpea. The effect of salinity could be relieved in plants inoculated with selected PGPR compared to plants not treated with PGPR. Primary root length enhancement was maximal in MSC4 followed by MSC1. Similarly, Vivas and others (2003) reported enhanced root and shoot growth of lettuce inoculated with Bacillus spp. under dry salt stress conditions. Munns (2003) mentioned that suppression of plant growth under saline stress may be due to the decreasing availability of water or toxicity of high salt concentrations. 4¡¢A substantial increase in root length may be responsible for increased nutrient uptake by plants. The seeds treated with MSC4 and MSC1 showed maximum growth of roots and shoots, resulting in growth promotion and higher yields. Zahir and others (2008) reported increases in the shoot length, fresh weight, and number of leaves per pea plant. This result is in accordance with our results where we observed an increase in root length, shoot length£¬number of leaves, and lateral root count of chickpea when inoculated with MSC1 and MSC4 under salt stress. An increase in chlorophyll content in all plants treated with PGPR under saline stress has also been reported by Nadeem and others (2006), whereas Lee and others (2001) reported an increase in chlorophyll a and b in lettuce plants grown in the presence of NaCl stress. Increased chlorophyll content may be the result of an increase in the photosyn- thetic area of plant leaves at high salt stress by PGPR inoculation compared to control untreated plants where leaf area was reduced due to stress. An increase in chlorophyll content may also be attributed to the increase in the pho-tosynthesis load on plants to fulfill plant nutrient require-ments under stress conditions. According to Cheeseman (1988), salinity stress diverts metabolic carbon to storage pools, so as a result less carbon is available for growth, leading to reduced growth of plants. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ɽ¶«Ê¡ÃæÉÏÏîÄ¿ÏÞ¶îÆÀÉó
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±¾©»¯¹¤´óѧ070300 ѧ˶336Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÉúÎïѧ071000 329·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÖпƼ¼´óѧ071000£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÉúÎïѧһ־Ը985£¬·ÖÊý349Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÉúÎïѧµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼ÁԺУÐÅÏ¢
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
085600²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤306
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
286Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
328Çóµ÷¼Á£¬Ó¢ÓïÁù¼¶551£¬ÓпÆÑоÀú
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´

wildwolf110
½û³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- ·ÒëEPI: 49
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 4015.2
- É¢½ð: 100
- ºì»¨: 26
- Ìû×Ó: 489
- ÔÚÏß: 143.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1388495
- ×¢²á: 2011-09-03
- רҵ: ÎÞ»ú»¯¹¤
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï ¡ï
°®ÓëÓêÏÂ(½ð±Ò+2): 2011-11-08 21:20:54
ydd1982(½ð±Ò+140, ·ÒëEPI+1): ÐÁ¿àÁË 2011-11-12 21:44:37
°®ÓëÓêÏÂ(½ð±Ò+2): 2011-11-08 21:20:54
ydd1982(½ð±Ò+140, ·ÒëEPI+1): ÐÁ¿àÁË 2011-11-12 21:44:37
|
3 ÓÃÓ¥×ì¶¹ÅèÔÔÊÔÑé¹Û²ìµ½ÁËÎÒÃǵÄÑо¿ÎåÖÖ·ÖÀëµÄЧ¹û£¬ÓëûÓÐÓÃPGPR´¦ÀíµÄÖ²ÎïÏà±È£¬ÓÃPGPR½ÓÖÖÖ²ÎÑζȵÄÓ°Ïì¿ÉÒԵõ½»º½â¡£ÔÚMSC4ÖУ¬Ö÷¸ù³¤¶ÈÔö¼Ó×î´ó£¬Æä´ÎÊÇÔÚMSC1ÖС£Í¬Ñù£¬Î¬Íß˹ºÍÆäËûÈ˱¨µÀ£¨2003£©£¬½ÓÖÖÑ¿æß¸Ë¾úÄÜÔöÇ¿¸ùºÍÐÂÉÒÉú³¤µÄÝ«ÜÄ£¬ÔÚ¸ÉÑÎѹÁ¦Ìõ¼þÏ£¬MunnsÌáµ½£¬ÔÚÉúÀíÑÎË®µÄѹÁ¦ÏµÄÖ²ÎïÉú³¤ÒÖÖÆ×÷ÓÿÉÄÜÊÇÓÉÓÚË®µÄÀûÓÃÂʼõÉÙ»ò¸ßŨ¶ÈÑζ¾ÐÔÒýÆðµÄ¡£ 4 ¸ù³¤¶ÈµÄ´ó·ùÔö¼Ó¿ÉÄܹéÒòÓÚÓÉÖ²ÎïÑø·ÖÎüÊÕµÄÔö¼Ó£¬ÓÃMSC4ºÍMSC1´¦ÀíµÄÖÖ×Ó±íÃ÷£¬¸ùÓëÑ¿µÄ×î´óÔö³¤Äܹ»´Ù½øÉú³¤ºÍ²úÁ¿µÄÌá¸ß¡£²éÏ£¶û¼°ÆäËûÈË£¨2008£©±¨µÀÁËÑ¿³¤£¬ÏÊÖØ£¬ÒÔ¼°Ã¿¿ÃÍã¶¹µÄÒ¶×ÓÊýÁ¿µÄÔö¼Ó¡£ÕâÒ»½á¹ûÓëÔÚÑÎвÆÈÏ£¬ÓÃMSC1ºÍMSC4½ÓÖÖʱ£¬ÎÒÃǹ۲쵽¸ù³¤£¬Ñ¿³¤£¬Ò¶Æ¬Êý £¬Ó¥×ì¶¹²à¸ùÊýµÄÔö¼Ó²»Ä±¶øºÏ£¬ÄɵÏÄ·µÈÈËÒ²Óб¨µÀÁË£¨2006£©£¬ÔÚÑÎвÆÈÏ£¬PGPR´¦ÀíËùÓеÄÖ²ÎïÖеÄÒ¶ÂÌËØº¬Á¿µÄÔö¼Ó£¬¶øÀîµÈÈË·¢ÏÖÔÚÑÎвÆÈÏ£¬Éú²ËÖ²ÎïÉú³¤ÖÐÒ¶ÂÌËØaºÍbµÄÔö¼Ó£¬Óëδ¾´¦ÀíµÄÖ²ÎïÒòÑÎвÆÈÒ¶Ãæ»ý¼õÉÙÏà±È£¬Ò¶ÂÌËØº¬Á¿µÄÔö¼Ó¿ÉÄÜÊÇÔÚ¸ßÑÎвÆÈÏ£¬PGPR½ÓÖÖÔÚÖ²ÎïҶƬµÄ¹âºÏÃæ»ýÔö¼ÓµÄ½á¹û¡£Ò¶ÂÌËØº¬Á¿µÄÔö¼ÓÒ²¿ÉÄÜÊÇÓÉÓÚÖ²Îï¹âºÏ×÷ÓøºÔصÄÔö¼Ó£¬ÒÔÂú×ãÔÚÑÎвÆÈÌõ¼þÏÂÖ²ÎïÓªÑøµÄÐèÇó¡£¾ÝÆæË¹Âü±¨µÀ£¨1988Ä꣩£¬ÑÎвÆÈ½«´úÐ»Ì¼×ªÒÆµ½´æ´¢³Ø£¬½á¹û½µµÍ̼µÄÔö³¤£¬´Ó¶ø¼õÉÙÖ²ÎïÔö³¤¡£ |
2Â¥2011-11-08 16:06:59













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥