| 查看: 273 | 回复: 0 | |||
[交流]
这几句话是什么意思
|
|
1.This paper does not warrant publication as the results are speculative and the work does not convince me that the authors are measuring recovery from ----. 2.Whilst the number of animals in the control and test groups appears to be reasonable the efficacy of the Chinese herbal medicine groups is insignificant at only 10% and 20% decrease. These numbers do not add up in the tables and figures. This raises serious questions as to the validity of the reporting. 3 Inclusion of references as to the "validated effective (sic)' of the 药物1 and 药物2 would be useful for other scientists studying CHM decoctions. 上面是编辑的回复,有些看不懂,请各位指点。 [ Last edited by 安徽人 on 2011-10-20 at 20:10 ] |
» 猜你喜欢
萌生出自己或许不适合搞科研的想法,现在跑or等等看?
已经有4人回复
Materials Today Chemistry审稿周期
已经有4人回复
参与限项
已经有3人回复
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求
已经有7人回复
实验室接单子
已经有4人回复
全日制(定向)博士
已经有4人回复
对氯苯硼酸纯化
已经有3人回复
求助:我三月中下旬出站,青基依托单位怎么办?
已经有12人回复
所感
已经有4人回复
要不要辞职读博?
已经有7人回复












回复此楼