| 查看: 317 | 回复: 0 | |||
[交流]
这几句话是什么意思
|
|
1.This paper does not warrant publication as the results are speculative and the work does not convince me that the authors are measuring recovery from ----. 2.Whilst the number of animals in the control and test groups appears to be reasonable the efficacy of the Chinese herbal medicine groups is insignificant at only 10% and 20% decrease. These numbers do not add up in the tables and figures. This raises serious questions as to the validity of the reporting. 3 Inclusion of references as to the "validated effective (sic)' of the 药物1 and 药物2 would be useful for other scientists studying CHM decoctions. 上面是编辑的回复，有些看不懂，请各位指点。 [ Last edited by 安徽人 on 2011-10-20 at 20:10 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有23人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有22人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有7人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有14人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有11人回复
