| 查看: 314 | 回复: 1 | |||
qinshanlin金虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
New theories emerge to disprove OPERA faster-than-light neutrinos claim 已有1人参与
|
|
(PhysOrg.com) -- It's been just two weeks since the Oscillation Project with Emulsion-tRacking Apparatus (OPERA) team released its announcement claiming that they have been measuring muon neutrinos moving faster than the speed of light, causing an uproar in the physics community. Since that time, many papers (perhaps as many as 30 to the preprint server arXiv alone) have been published seeking ways to discredit the findings. Thus far though, only two seem credible. The first is by Carlo Contaldi of Imperial College London. He says that it’s likely the OPERA team failed to take gravity into their math equations and its effect on the clocks used to time the experiment. This because the degree of gravity at the two stations involved in the experiment (Gran Sasso National Laboratory in Italy and the CERN facility in Geneva) were different, thus one of the clocks would have been running slightly faster than the other, resulting in faulty timing. If this turns out to be the case, the OPERA team will most certainly be embarrassed to have overlooked such a basic problem with their study. The second is by Andrew Cohen and Sheldon Glashow, who together point out that if the neutrinos in the study were in fact traveling as fast as claimed, they should have been radiating particles as they went, leaving behind a measurable trail; this due to the energy transfer that would occur between particles moving at different speeds. And since the OPERA team didn’t observe any such trail (or at least didn’t report it) it follows that the neutrinos weren’t in fact traveling as fast as were claimed and the resultant speed measurements would have to be attributed to something else. Neither of these papers actually disproves the results found by the OPERA team of course, the first merely suggests there may be a problem with the way the measurements were taken, the second takes more of a “it can’t be true because of…” approach which only highlight the general disbelief in the physics community regarding the very possibility of anything, much less the speed of neutrinos traveling faster than the speed of light, messing with Einstein’s most basic theories. The first can be addressed rather easily by the OPERA team if it so desires, and the second, well, if the neutrinos did in fact travel faster than the speed of light and did so without leaving a trail, a lot of physics theory will have to be rethought. Though that may not necessarily be a bad thing, physics is supposed to be about finding answers to explain the natural world around us after all, even if it means going back to the drawing board now and then. © 2011 PhysOrg.com |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
求各位大神看下
已经有17人回复
-
好消息？这个有何含义？？？
已经有10人回复
-
咨询面上基金
已经有4人回复
-
8月时间戳变的，举个手。玩一下，释放压力
已经有10人回复
-
【2027博士申请】纳米药物递送方向
已经有4人回复
-
面上再次挂了，太难了，躺也躺不了，倦也卷不过，小学校之殇！
已经有29人回复
-
UV压敏胶开发
已经有7人回复
-
有没有H口的？有收到消息的吗？
已经有3人回复
-
十年后又回来了，论文投稿求助
已经有3人回复
-
纯娱乐，不喜欢勿喷
已经有10人回复
opanane
木虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 13 (小学生)
- 金币: 2948.2
- 散金: 20
- 红花: 6
- 帖子: 129
- 在线: 263.7小时
- 虫号: 1292941
- 注册: 2011-05-11
- 专业: 粒子物理学和场论
2楼2011-10-07 23:02:41