| 查看: 2950 | 回复: 9 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
文章被拒了，编辑希望我重投，帮忙看下重投有希望吗？
|
||
|
投了biochemical engineering journal的文章，被拒绝了。大家看看我重投还有戏吗？编辑意见如下。呃~明说一下，由于是第一次投文章，背景部分参考文献什么的写的是挺次的... Thank you for submitting your manuscript for consideration for publication in the BEJ. This manuscript addresses a very interesting topic for the BEJ. However, in its present form it does not have sufficient novelty or impact to consider it as a significant contribution to biochemical engineering. Therefore, I must reject your manuscript. Additional comments are provided below. Although this will be a disappointing outcome, I would encourage you to consider submitting a new manuscript to address the issues raised below. If you decide to resubmit in this way you will need to make an entirely new submission. However, in your new submission cover letter you should indicate the manuscript number of your original submission and explain in detail how you have addressed the comments below. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Yours sincerely, William M. Miller Editor Biochemical Engineering Journal Additional comments: The authors must directly compare their results for rhamnolipid production for the different process modifications with those reported by other investigators. Specific comparisons should be made in terms of the extent and rate of cell growth and rhamnolipid production. The authors should also compare their results with those for other similar fermentations, as well as for other modeling studies. The authors must clearly describe what is novel and of high impact in their work. The approaches used seem relatively standard and the models used are well established. Why would this work be of interest to readers of the BEJ? The Results and Discussion section has no citations of other published studies. Since biosurfactant fermentation is an active area of research, I would expect the authors to compare their results with those from many other studies. Surprisingly, only 17 references are cited with 3 from 2007 and more recent. Given the very active nature of this field, I would expect the authors to cite many more recent studies. Finally, few of the cited references are from the Biochemical Engineering Journal or other journals that focus on biochemical engineering. This will decrease interest in the paper by readers of the BEJ. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
281求调剂（0805）
已经有23人回复
-
265求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
279分求调剂 一志愿211
已经有10人回复
-
招收调剂硕士
已经有12人回复
-
296求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
招收博士1-2人
已经有3人回复
-
085700资源与环境308求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
274求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
290求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
一志愿西南交通 专硕 材料355 本科双非 求调剂
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 在JPCC上投了稿，编辑给的信看不懂，希望大家帮忙
已经有12人回复
- 大家帮忙看看编辑回信，什么意思啊
已经有4人回复
- 大家帮我看看编辑的回信，看看有戏吗？
已经有6人回复
- 帮忙看下编辑的信里关于格式问题的话
已经有14人回复
- 请达人帮忙看一下，编辑如下的拒稿理由能否debate一下
已经有6人回复
- 请大侠们帮忙看看编辑这样说是什么意思呢
已经有6人回复
- 大家帮忙看一下编辑的意思
已经有6人回复
- 投稿被拒了，不甘心想写信给编辑，大家帮我看下该怎么写？
已经有10人回复
- 大家帮忙看下 编辑让我为他提供什么呢
已经有9人回复
- 审稿意见回来，一个审稿人让据，编辑说大修，大家帮我看看希望大不
已经有24人回复
- 大家帮我看看这个编辑意见修改有希望吗
已经有14人回复
nanerlong
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1682.5
- 散金: 92
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 189
- 在线: 195.4小时
- 虫号: 1269860
- 注册: 2011-04-19
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 生物化学
4楼2011-10-04 15:55:40
seapass
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
超哥
- SEPI: 18
- 应助: 772 (博后)
- 贵宾: 3.074
- 金币: 16568.4
- 散金: 5496
- 红花: 82
- 沙发: 10
- 帖子: 3728
- 在线: 930.8小时
- 虫号: 441856
- 注册: 2007-10-27
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 海洋环境科学
2楼2011-10-03 17:25:59
匿名
用户注销 (正式写手)
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1037.9
- 散金: 622
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 534
- 在线: 141.5小时
- 虫号: 0
- 注册: 2011-03-17
- 专业: 地球内部物理学
3楼2011-10-03 18:21:15
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
5楼2011-10-04 16:02:23
50