24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 472  |  回复: 2
当前主题已经存档。

lsd01

金虫 (小有名气)


[资源] 【其他】【转载】教你怎样审阅英文科技文献?(欢迎收藏)

How to Critically Read a Scientific Paper

A general strategy for reading and understanding a scientific paper is to read the material critically.  There are two underlying themes to this strategy.  First, one must ask his/her own questions about the material (i.e. about the methods, data, figures, concept, etc.), and attempt to answer them after careful analysis of the paper.  Second, one must integrate the information from the paper into his/her own larger body of knowledge.  This second theme is most successfully accomplished by drawing a graphic model of the “new reality” which the paper reveals.  

Step 1.  Looking at the Pictures
Before you begin reading the paper look at and try to understand each figure, table and graph.  This is the focal point of the paper.  The text will eventually help you to understand them completely, but this step will put you in “Question Asking Mode” and will help you to get started on your critical examination of the paper.
1.        Look at each figure, graph, or table and try to understand what is being presented.  Read the figure legends and notes associated with each piece of data.
2.        Make brief notes on what you do understand about each figure (i.e. what is being measured?  What technique was used to generate the data?  What were the independent variables, dependent variables and controls?).  Determine if you understand the concept behind the different techniques used to generate the data.  If you do not then make sure you learn about them before you even attempt to read the paper (i.e. go to your textbooks).
3.        For anything (and everything) that you don’t understand, write an explicit question (i.e. What is that smallest band in Lane 3 on this protein gel?  or Why does the mutant strain have the highest enzyme activity?).  Try to answer your own questions (take a stab at it) based on what you know.
4.        After you finish looking at the pictures, tables and graphs make a guess about what methods you expect to see described in the materials and methods section.  Write these down.  Once again, if you do not understand any of these techniques then do some research before you begin reading the paper.  It is very difficult to try to understand research when you don’t know how it was done.

Step 2.  Read through once.
1.        Read the paper from beginning to end.
2.        Mark or highlight every place where one of your earlier questions is answered.  
3.        Formulate new questions about things you do not understand.  Make sure you are very specific in your questions (i.e. don’t just write, huh?).

Step 3.  Critical Analysis
Every scientific paper is like a narrative of things that the researchers thought and did.  The formal structure of a modern paper (i.e. Title, Abstract, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion) obscures the thought process that directed the research, but this process can be rediscovered by careful examination.  This step is extremely important in order to understand the material.

Steps in the critical analysis:
1.        Significant prior knowledge/current ignorance. What specific information (from earlier work) formed the basis for the experiments reported in the paper.  You can usually find this information in the introduction.  In your own words state what is known about the research and what is still unknown.
2.        The Main Hypothesis and Alternatives.  All research is directed by a hypothesis and one or more alternative hypotheses.  In your own words, state all of the hypotheses directing the research.
3.        Assumptions (Explicit and Implicit).  Often the authors will tell you that they assumed something would (or would not) affect their experimental results.  This is an explicit assumption.  Authors also imply some assumptions (implicit assumptions).  These are rather subtle.  An example might be that they assume Ohm’s Law was working when they ran the electrophoresis, or that there are no plasmids in a strain if plasmid DNA cannot be isolated from the strain.  Identify all of the assumptions (implicit and explicit) made and state why you agree or disagree with them.

Note:  Hypotheses are things that are tested in the research and assumptions are things that are not tested.  Learn to distinguish between them.

4.        Elements of Support or non-support.  Questions are answered and hypotheses are either supported or not supported using experimental procedures (i.e. by the data).  Look at the data again and re-read the materials and methods section and the results section.  Were the methods appropriate?  Did they offer evidence to support the hypothesis?  Was the data interpreted correctly?  For example, was the gel band seen in lane 1 really brighter than the control or would you interpret something differently.  It is important to not assume that just because a paper was published that it is the gospel truth.  Remember that you are training to be a scientist; therefore, you need to be convinced that the data supports the hypothesis.
5.        Change in Reality?  Did the data support any of the hypotheses?  Be able to explain why or why not.  Was this work a significant contribution to science or just a small contribution?  Can this research be applicable to some greater cause?  How does this work change our understanding?  Draw a graphical model showing what was considered correct before the work was done and draw a model showing what is now considered correct after the work was done.  Examine how the two models differ (if at all).
6.        The Next Step.  When a hypothesis is supported there is always another question that arises.  This is a natural occurrence in scientific research.  State one or a few new questions that come to your mind.  Predict what new set of experiments can be done to answer the new questions.  Are there any new experiments can be done to give further support for the previous hypothesis?

[ Last edited by cuiwk on 2006-12-4 at 18:09 ]
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bankkom

木虫 (小有名气)


2楼2006-12-04 16:36:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

茸草儿2006


3楼2006-12-05 18:27:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 lsd01 的主题更新
☆ 无星级 ★ 一星级 ★★★ 三星级 ★★★★★ 五星级
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 基金未中,这种答复是模板吗? +3 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 3/150 2026-08-27 10:48 by iwuli
[教师之家] 导师吐槽:我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生! +5 苏东坡二世 2026-08-23 5/250 2026-08-27 10:39 by 炜雨
[基金申请] 看板上这么多中的,有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉…… +4 a089 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-27 09:24 by Howard28
[基金申请] 基金不中,共勉 +7 eulota 2026-08-26 7/350 2026-08-27 09:02 by hsding2026
[基金申请] 让我中一个面上吧! +13 大萍1987 2026-08-20 17/850 2026-08-27 08:20 by 大萍1987
[教师之家] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急 +3 LIbGuocjEEYw 2026-08-26 4/200 2026-08-27 04:33 by Ie9AyIAvGbvs
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 LIbGuocjEEYw 2026-08-26 4/200 2026-08-27 02:01 by Ie9AyIAvGbvs
[基金申请] 2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战 +7 process2012 2026-08-23 10/500 2026-08-26 19:23 by hmhminy
[基金申请] 2026年8月25日国自然放榜前突然收到列入评审专家邮件,有关系吗? +25 木水思豆 2026-08-25 28/1400 2026-08-26 14:53 by draco1987
[基金申请] 能否退出参与的面上项目解除限项 +23 koalala 2026-08-24 26/1300 2026-08-26 14:29 by 宝贝虫子
[基金申请] 出来了 +9 trojank 2026-08-26 9/450 2026-08-26 14:25 by 宝贝虫子
[基金申请] 国际合作可查了,中了面上 +18 Ldrop2023 2026-08-26 18/900 2026-08-26 11:15 by cmrandy
[基金申请] 系统进不去 +4 yanglien 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-26 11:10 by wenfengw83
[基金申请] 国合可查了 +3 paperzjh 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-26 10:41 by LemmonTr
[基金申请] 今天务委会开完了,明天出结果吗 +19 angus9576 2026-08-25 23/1150 2026-08-26 10:03 by zp519
[基金申请] 牛来!米来!面来! +8 beefly 2026-08-26 8/400 2026-08-26 08:37 by xuzhipiao
[基金申请] 明天应该可查了!? +6 chengyan1220 2026-08-23 6/300 2026-08-25 19:45 by zfd97
[基金申请] 没有任何消息-是不是就凉了 +9 图啦图啦 2026-08-24 10/500 2026-08-25 11:59 by 南海小哥
[基金申请] 时间戳今天,20号变了 +5 archvillain 2026-08-20 5/250 2026-08-22 06:12 by hui_daxiao
[基金申请] 基金啊基金 +4 longfie172 2026-08-20 4/200 2026-08-21 08:58 by mark mao
信息提示
请填处理意见