±±¾©Ê¯ÓÍ»¯¹¤Ñ§Ôº2026ÄêÑо¿ÉúÕÐÉú½ÓÊÕµ÷¼Á¹«¸æ
²é¿´: 169  |  »Ø¸´: 0

daisy_sky

Òø³æ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)

[ÇóÖú] ҩѧÀà Glycemic Control and Perinatal Outcomes of Pregnancies

Glycemic Control and Perinatal Outcomes of Pregnancies Complicated by Type 1 Diabetes: Influence of Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion and Lispro Insulin
Abstract
Aims: This study compared glycemic control and maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with type 1
diabetes mellitus (T1DM) treated with multiple daily injections (MDI) or continuous subcutaneous insulin
infusion (CSII) using regular (RI) or lispro (LP) insulin.
Methods: Three hundred fifteen consecutive singleton pregnancies of T1DM women using the same insulin
program since before pregnancy (196 MDI with NPH+ RI, 16 MDI with NPH+ LP, 44 CSII with RI, 59 CSII with
LP) were studied. Variables of glycemic control assessed included glycated hemoglobin, mean blood glucose
(MBG), and insulin doses in each trimester, diabetic ketoacidosis, and hypoglycemic comas. Variables of
pregnancy outcome included miscarriage, preterm birth, large or small for gestational age (LGA or SGA,
respectively) newborns, and perinatal mortality. Multiple linear regression and logistic regression analysis were
used.
Results: Groups differed in baseline and glycemic control but not in maternal or fetal outcomes. In multivariate
analysis, LP was associated with higher second trimester MBG and lower rate of hypoglycemic coma, CSII with
higher third trimester MBG, and CSII + LP with lower insulin requirements and lower rate of hypoglycemic
coma. As to pregnancy outcomes, LP was associated with lower risk of preterm birth and higher risk of SGA,
CSII with lower risk of SGA and higher risk of LGA and perinatal mortality, and CSII + LP with higher risk of
miscarriage.
Conclusions: Pregnant women with T1DM using LP and/or CSII had different characteristics. LP with or
without CSII was independently associated with fewer hypoglycemic comas, whereas impact of LP/CSII on the
fetus had a favorable or an unfavorable influence depending on the specific outcome.

[ Last edited by daisy_sky on 2011-9-6 at 20:22 ]

» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶

ÒÑÔÄ   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
Ïà¹Ø°æ¿éÌø×ª ÎÒÒª¶©ÔÄÂ¥Ö÷ daisy_sky µÄÖ÷Ìâ¸üÐÂ
×î¾ßÈËÆøÈÈÌûÍÆ¼ö [²é¿´È«²¿] ×÷Õß »Ø/¿´ ×îºó·¢±í
[¿¼ÑÐ] 283Çóµ÷¼Á +17 A child 2026-04-04 17/850 2026-04-07 11:36 by Ê«Óë×ÔÓÉ
[¿¼ÑÐ] 353Çóµ÷¼Á +3 Çç¿ÕÍòÀïair 2026-04-07 3/150 2026-04-07 11:10 by Ê«Óë×ÔÓÉ
[ÂÛÎÄͶ¸å] Decision: Revise for Editor»¹»áËÍÉóÂð 100+3 CccccccccFD 2026-04-04 5/250 2026-04-07 10:58 by ±±¾©À³ÒðÈóÉ«
[¿¼ÑÐ] 304Çóµ÷¼Á£¨085602£¬¹ýËļ¶£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸985£© +18 »¯¹¤ÈË999 2026-04-04 18/900 2026-04-07 09:50 by Öí»á·É
[¿¼ÑÐ] 362Çóµ÷¼Á +7 ÎÒÒª¿¼´ó 2026-04-06 11/550 2026-04-07 09:32 by ÎÒÒª¿¼´ó
[¿¼ÑÐ] һ־Ը̫ԭÀí¹¤´óѧ¼ÆËã»ú¼¼Êõר˶348£¬Çóµ÷¼ÁÖ¸µ¼ +3 nexious 2026-04-05 3/150 2026-04-07 08:19 by jp9609
[¿¼ÑÐ] 290Çóµ÷¼Á +7 luoziheng 2026-04-04 7/350 2026-04-04 23:17 by lqwchd
[¿¼ÑÐ] ²ÄÁÏÇóµ÷¼Á +10 ÄØÄØÄÝÄÝ 2026-04-01 10/500 2026-04-04 23:12 by Î޼ʵIJÝÔ­
[¿¼ÑÐ] 322Çóµ÷¼Á +4 FZAC123 2026-04-03 4/200 2026-04-03 20:55 by zhq0425
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÖÐũҵ071010£¬×Ü·Ö320Çóµ÷¼Á +7 À§À§À§À§À¤À¤ 2026-04-02 7/350 2026-04-03 17:26 by Yuena_Wang
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] esi¸ß±»ÒýÂÛÎÄÊDz»ÊÇÄܶÔÖбêÓÐËù¼Ó·ÖºÍ°ïÖúÄØ +5 redcom 2026-04-01 6/300 2026-04-03 15:15 by Howard28
[¿¼ÑÐ] 081200-11408-276ѧ˶Çóµ÷¼Á +5 ´Þwj 2026-04-03 5/250 2026-04-03 15:06 by arrow8852
[¿¼ÑÐ] 289-Çóµ÷¼Á +4 ÕâÀïÊÇ_ 2026-04-03 4/200 2026-04-03 14:23 by 1753564080
[¿¼ÑÐ] 283Çóµ÷¼Á +3 jiouuu 2026-04-03 4/200 2026-04-03 13:28 by jiouuu
[¿¼ÑÐ] 320Çóµ÷¼Á +3 ũҵ¹¤³ÌÓëÐÅÏ¢¼ 2026-04-03 3/150 2026-04-03 11:40 by ÍÁľ˶ʿÕÐÉú
[¿¼ÑÐ] 312Çóµ÷¼Á +6 ССī123 2026-04-02 7/350 2026-04-03 07:32 by jsw79
[¿¼²©] É격ÇóÖú +3 Reee1Llll 2026-04-01 3/150 2026-04-02 22:29 by ÕâÊÇÒ»¸öÎÞÁĵÄê
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸¸´µ©²ÄÁÏ£¬Ó¢Ò»×¨Ë¶£¬×Ü·Ö357µ÷¼Á +4 1050389037 2026-04-02 5/250 2026-04-02 21:40 by dongzh2009
[¿¼ÑÐ] ѧ˶»¯Ñ§¹¤³ÌÓë¼¼Êõ£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Öйúº£Ñó´óѧ320+Çóµ÷¼Á +8 ÅûÐÇºÓ 2026-04-02 8/400 2026-04-02 14:12 by oooqiao
[¿¼ÑÐ] »¯Ñ§¹¤³Ìר˶324·Ö£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Öйú¿óÒµ´óѧÇóµ÷¼Á +7 ¹¢¹¢1314 2026-04-01 7/350 2026-04-02 07:40 by ÉÐË®¸óÖ÷
ÐÅÏ¢Ìáʾ
ÇëÌî´¦ÀíÒâ¼û