24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1550  |  回复: 16
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

小叶3061

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 转到PCCP是意味着得到PCCP的认可,只需要按要求修改就行吗?

We require a strong positive endorsement by both reviewers to make a case for publication, and this is not the case here.  After careful evaluation of the manuscript and reports, I therefore regret to inform you that we do not find your current manuscript suitable for publication in Energy & Environmental Science.

However, if you are willing we would be willing to publish a revised version of this work in our excellent sister-journal Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP).

PCCP has a broad, community-spanning readership and strong reputation for quality.  The current Impact Factor is one of the highest in the general physical chemistry field.

If you completed the referees' modifications, we will quickly proceed with publication in PCCP.

If you decide to transfer to PCCP, please include a detailed summary of new work that may have been added and a point by point list of the changes made. Submissions can be made through your author centre at:。。。。。。。

转到PCCP是意味着得到PCCP的认可,只需要按要求修改就行吗?
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

cenwanglai

荣誉版主 (知名作家)

老和山猥琐派九段

优秀版主

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by ChenNano at 2011-10-15 15:45:03:
这两个期刊就是一个主编,没有问题.不过后者要差的很多!是一个基本上不入流的期刊

非常想听听为什么PCCP是不入流的期刊。

JPCC是不跟PCCP一个水平的?


因为去各大期刊网站看,都是一色的高创新要求,搞得像是只有配得上诺贝尔奖的发现才能写好文章发到他们期刊上似的。

非常汗~~
5楼2012-01-04 15:12:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 17 个回答

myplato

木虫 (著名写手)


【答案】应助回帖

小叶3061(金币+2): 2011-09-06 10:36:42
应该是的

恭喜
2楼2011-09-06 08:16:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

小叶3061

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by myplato at 2011-09-06 08:16:27:
应该是的

恭喜

谢谢!
3楼2011-09-06 08:18:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ChenNano

金虫 (正式写手)

这两个期刊就是一个主编,没有问题.不过后者要差的很多!是一个基本上不入流的期刊
4楼2011-10-15 15:45:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见