| ²é¿´: 2905 | »Ø¸´: 14 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
ch1002½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
Water Research£¬×òÌì´óÐÞÖ®ºó½ñÌìÖ±½ÓDecision in Process£¬ÓÐÏ·Âð£¿(2Ììºó½ÓÊÜ) ÒÑÓÐ13È˲ÎÓë
|
||
|
×òÌì´óÐÞÖ®ºó½ñÌìÖ±½ÓDecision in Process£¬ÓÐÏ·Âð£¿ÎªÊ²Ã´²»ÕÒÉó¸åÈËÔÚ¿´¿´£¿ ֮ǰÁ½¸öÉó¸åÈË£¬±à¼Òâ¼ûÈçÏ£º can now inform you that the reviewers and editor have evaluated your manuscript. As you will see from the comments below and on http://ees.elsevier.com/wr/, publication in its present form is not recommended, and major revision is being requested. Reviewer #1: The paper presents XXXXX(Ê¡ÂÔ100×Ö). Before the paper is accepted for publication the following issues need also to be clarified as well as the following corrections be made: È»ºóÊÇ15¸öÎÊÌâ¡£ Reviewer #2: The paper by XXX et al deals with XXXXXXX. The performance of the system is moderate in comparison to those that presently exist in literature. The paper is generally well written and provides a novel approach to fluoride removal from water. However there are some unclear statements and lots of typing errors that must be corrected. In particular, the authors should consult language expert to help improve the paper. In same cases the intext citations are poorly done, for example, in page 6 (last line) the authors have a citation like et al., 2002. È»ºóÊÇ6¸öÎÊÌâ¡£ ¸ÄÁË2ÖÜÁË£¬×òÌì»ØÐÞ£¬ÏÂÎçwith Editor£¬10·ÖÖÓºó¾Í Decision in Process£¬ºöÈ»ºÃŰ¡. [ Last edited by ch1002 on 2011-8-27 at 00:08 ] |
» ±¾ÌûÒÑ»ñµÃµÄºì»¨£¨×îÐÂ10¶ä£©
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
²ÄÁÏר˶ӢһÊý¶þ306
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
085600²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤µ÷¼Á 324·Ö
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
0703»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
0703»¯Ñ§ 305Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
0703»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á£¬Çó¸÷λÀÏʦÊÕÁô
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
271²ÄÁϹ¤³ÌÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
281Çóµ÷¼Á£¨0805£©
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
304Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϹ¤³Ìר˶µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Ìì´ó²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤£¨085600£©×Ü·Ö338
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
Water ResearchµÚ¶þƪÓÖÊÇ´óÐÞ£¬ÇóÓоÑ鳿×Ó½â»ó¡£
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
´óÐÞºó ±à¼ÔÙÌáÎʺó decision in process µÄÎÊÌâ
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
Decision in Process ÕâÊÇʲôÒâ˼°¡
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
Ͷ¸åappl catal a, 20ÌìÁË£¬»¹decision in process£¬Õ¦»ØÊÂ
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
´óÐÞÒÔºóÏÂÎçwith Editor£¬10·ÖÖÓºó¾Í Decision in Process£¬Ôõô»ØÊ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ÓйشóÐÞºódecision in processµÄÎÊÌâ
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
SBBÎÄÕÂunder review°ë¸öÔÂÖ±½Ó±ä³ÉDecision in processÊÇʲôÇé¿ö£¿
ÒѾÓÐ30È˻ظ´
moderate revise Ö®ºó2Ìì±ä³ÉDecision in Process½ÓÊյļ¸ÂÊ´óÂð
ÒѾÓÐ74È˻ظ´
decision in process 11ÌìÁË
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
Required reviews completed µ½decision in process²Å°ëÌìÊDz»ÊDZ¾ßÁË
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
´óÐÞºóͶ¸åÈýÌì³öÏÖdecision in process£¬Ð×»¹ÊǼª£¿
ÒѾÓÐ24È˻ظ´
ÎÄÕÂͶ¸å8¸öÔºódecision in process±»¾ÜµÄ¿ÉÄÜÐÔ´óô£¿
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
½á¹ûÊÇreconsider if revised(40Ìì¾ÍDecision in Process£¬¹À¼ÆÒª±»¾ÜÀ²£¬Ì«¿ìÀ²)
ÒѾÓÐ52È˻ظ´
xinsijun
½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1184.4
- É¢½ð: 28
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 190
- ÔÚÏß: 283.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 122930
- ×¢²á: 2005-12-04
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ½ºÌåÓë½çÃæ»¯Ñ§
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
| ÕâÖÖÇé¿öÖ»ÒªÈÏÕæ»Ø´ðÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÎÊÌâ,»ù±¾¾ÍûÎÊÌâµÄ. |
9Â¥2011-08-28 14:53:22
duanhb
Òø³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 8 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 242.6
- É¢½ð: 25
- ºì»¨: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 116
- ÔÚÏß: 331.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 498263
- ×¢²á: 2008-02-03
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: »·¾³¹¤³Ì
2Â¥2011-08-26 02:29:55
wangdj
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
Ph.D.
- Ó¦Öú: 43 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 3980.4
- É¢½ð: 303
- ºì»¨: 5
- Ìû×Ó: 351
- ÔÚÏß: 157.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 803373
- ×¢²á: 2009-07-04
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: »·¾³ÎÛȾ»¯Ñ§
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
ËÍÏÊ»¨Ò»¶ä
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
ËÍÏÊ»¨Ò»¶ä | Ö±½Ó½ÓÊÜ£¬ÎÒµÄÒ²ÊÇ´óÐÞ£¨WR£©£¬×òÍí½ÓÊÜ¡£´ÓÌá½»µ½½ÓÊܲ»µ½2Ìì¡£ |

4Â¥2011-08-26 08:28:40
lgswj74
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 5 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1594.5
- É¢½ð: 371
- ºì»¨: 8
- Ìû×Ó: 825
- ÔÚÏß: 484.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 699737
- ×¢²á: 2009-02-11
- רҵ: »·¾³¹¤³Ì
6Â¥2011-08-28 13:33:14













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥