24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (4740)
>文献求助 (355)
>导师招生 (345)
>休闲灌水 (224)
>论文投稿 (214)
>虫友互识 (139)
>考博 (127)
>博后之家 (126)
>学术会议 (105)
>教师之家 (56)
>找工作 (49)
>硕博家园 (44)
>招聘信息布告栏 (42)
>公派出国 (42)
>考研 (38)
>绿色求助(高悬赏) (37)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

ch1002

金虫 (正式写手)

SEPI: 2
应助: 19 (小学生)
金币: 1387.3
散金: 740
红花: 28
帖子: 690
在线: 215.1小时
虫号: 1205783
注册: 2011-02-18
性别: GG
专业: 环境工程

[交流] Water Research，昨天大修之后今天直接Decision in Process，有戏吗？(2天后接受) 已有13人参与

昨天大修之后今天直接Decision in Process，有戏吗？为什么不找审稿人在看看？

之前两个审稿人，编辑意见如下：
can now inform you that the reviewers and editor have evaluated your manuscript. As you will see from the comments below and on http://ees.elsevier.com/wr/, publication in its present form is not recommended, and major revision is being requested.

Reviewer #1: The paper presents XXXXX(省略100字). Before the paper is accepted for publication the following issues need also to be clarified as well as the following corrections be made:
然后是15个问题。

Reviewer #2: The paper by XXX et al deals with XXXXXXX. The performance of the system is moderate in comparison to those that presently exist in literature. The paper is generally well written and provides a novel approach to fluoride removal from water. However there are some unclear statements and lots of typing errors that must be corrected. In particular, the authors should consult language expert to help improve the paper. In same cases the intext citations are poorly done, for example, in page 6 (last line) the authors have a citation like et al., 2002.
然后是6个问题。

改了2周了，昨天回修，下午with Editor，10分钟后就 Decision in Process，忽然好怕啊.

[ Last edited by ch1002 on 2011-8-27 at 00:08 ]

回复此楼