| 查看: 626 | 回复: 1 | ||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | ||
安娜8885木虫 (著名写手)
|
[求助]
请帮助英译汉，谢谢
|
|
|
A number of scholarly papers and articles discussed later in chapter 2 focused on academic performance comparisons between charter schools and traditional public schools. Casey et al. (2002) argued that very little research was devoted to whether the presence of charter schools management created market like environments that enhance systemic improvements in public education. More detailed analysis will be provided in chapter 2. One important element remained similar throughout the research: school management companies were an integrated element in a successful charter school strategy (Bohte, 2004; Becker, Nakagawa & Corwin, 1997; Casey et al., 2002; Finn & Kanstoroom, 2002, Johnson & Landman, 2000). Since administrative performance was repeatedly used to demonstrate the difference between a typical public school administration and charter school management, more time needs to be spent to analyze primary differences between those two models. |
回复此楼
lflflflflf88
至尊木虫 (著名写手)
- 翻译EPI: 8
- 应助: 11 (小学生)
- 金币: 12188.6
- 红花: 16
- 帖子: 1909
- 在线: 386.6小时
- 虫号: 1244293
- 注册: 2011-03-25
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 催化化学
【答案】应助回帖
★
爱与雨下(金币+1): ~! 2011-08-23 22:11:34
安娜8885(金币+45, 翻译EPI+1): 2011-08-24 18:41:45
爱与雨下(金币+1): ~! 2011-08-23 22:11:34
安娜8885(金币+45, 翻译EPI+1): 2011-08-24 18:41:45
|
在接下来的第二章中，有一些学术论文着眼于政府特许学校和传统公立学校的学业成绩的比较。Casey等（2002）认为我们很少有研究关注政府特许学校管理机构的出现是否创造出了一种能系统提高公众教育的氛围。而在第二章中我们将会有更详尽的分析。在整个研究中，有一点毋庸置疑：学校管理公司是成功的政府特许学校管理模式中的一个综合要素(Bohte, 2004; Becker, Nakagawa & Corwin, 1997; Casey et al., 2002; Finn & Kanstoroom, 2002, Johnson & Landman, 2000)。在以往行政效能经常被用作区分典型的公立学校和政府特许学校之间的管理模式之别，（而现在）我们要花费更多时间研究以上两种模式的本质区别。 呵呵,楼主见笑了啊~你再看着改改吧^    |
2楼2011-08-23 22:04:16
