24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 834  |  回复: 6

loveskyzhou

铁虫 (正式写手)


[交流] 一篇新手GRE ARGUMENT 望点评

The writer concludes that it is a fortune for citizens to elect ANN Green(AG) to be the mayoral of city Clearview. As he said that AG is a member of Good Earth Colition so that a better environmental condition would gain as a result of his endeavor. On the other hand , the current mayoral Frank Braun was totally different and failed in protect our environment and even ignore the significance of environment protection.After the reasons were given, I found 4 main cognitive errors in the editor's artical.
        First of all , the editor simplify the work of a mayoral and cites to much relationship between environment protetion and mayoral' s responsibility. Environment is definitely important for us and our offspring , never the less, we should still take attention to other aspects such as econemy and education. In other words,a reasonable dicision and a correct justification were extraordinary needed when a mayoral balance the development of a city.
        Secondly, it's helpful if a mayoral to be a member of a environment protecting group, but it don't represent any contributions that he have made. More over , we still don't konw whether he join the protecting group is a political show. the reason of Many people join a welfare ognization would be a better reputation than real contribution.
        Thirdly, the editor mentioned the growth of factories in city Clearview. As I see it , it can not be a reason to blame the current mayoral since no evidence have get to prove this reproach. Actually ,more and more factories become low carbon and make a good deal of contribution to the local economy. The main mission is the supervise of goveronment as well as the altitude of the mayoral.
        Last but nor least, the reason of respiratory disease in Clearview increase may have no relevance with the factory's development and No statistics were given to testify his opinion. In many countries such as German, heavy industry is everywhere, yet, the number of respiratory disease incidence is much lower than some development countries such an India.
        All in all(in sum), the editorial should find further evidences to prove his point of view. for instance, the works FB have done that protect our environment and obvious defects that mayoral AG  behaved. Moreover, the statistics about the pollution of factories and the relevance between pollution and respiratory symptom .in consideration of the experience of AG, there must be harder works make to win the election .

[ Last edited by 既傻又憨 on 2011-8-15 at 16:05 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

独孤踏雪

木虫 (著名写手)


都是占沙发的
5楼2011-12-27 19:55:37
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yingying1588

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)


祝福楼主!
6楼2011-12-27 20:03:47
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

静水流深向彪

铁虫 (小有名气)



小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
感觉你攻击的不是很有利,攻击的点不在于多,而在于把每一个点驳斥的非常透彻
7楼2012-01-06 12:18:53
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
2011-08-15 21:41  
chaowang3eg(金币+1): 欢迎常来噢~~ 2011-08-16 08:19:22
loveskyzhou(金币+1): 哦。。。我没有冒犯的意思,但我真不懂这花是啥意思。。。。 2011-08-16 09:46:29
2011-08-16 08:19  
lelisuode4楼
2011-08-16 09:45  
loveskyzhou(金币+1): 哦。。。我没有冒犯的意思,但我真不懂这花是啥意思。。。。 2011-08-16 09:46:36
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 loveskyzhou 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见