| 查看: 947 | 回复: 6 | |||
[交流]
一篇新手GRE ARGUMENT 望点评
|
|||
|
The writer concludes that it is a fortune for citizens to elect ANN Green(AG) to be the mayoral of city Clearview. As he said that AG is a member of Good Earth Colition so that a better environmental condition would gain as a result of his endeavor. On the other hand , the current mayoral Frank Braun was totally different and failed in protect our environment and even ignore the significance of environment protection.After the reasons were given, I found 4 main cognitive errors in the editor's artical. First of all , the editor simplify the work of a mayoral and cites to much relationship between environment protetion and mayoral' s responsibility. Environment is definitely important for us and our offspring , never the less, we should still take attention to other aspects such as econemy and education. In other words，a reasonable dicision and a correct justification were extraordinary needed when a mayoral balance the development of a city. Secondly, it's helpful if a mayoral to be a member of a environment protecting group, but it don't represent any contributions that he have made. More over , we still don't konw whether he join the protecting group is a political show. the reason of Many people join a welfare ognization would be a better reputation than real contribution. Thirdly, the editor mentioned the growth of factories in city Clearview. As I see it , it can not be a reason to blame the current mayoral since no evidence have get to prove this reproach. Actually ,more and more factories become low carbon and make a good deal of contribution to the local economy. The main mission is the supervise of goveronment as well as the altitude of the mayoral. Last but nor least, the reason of respiratory disease in Clearview increase may have no relevance with the factory's development and No statistics were given to testify his opinion. In many countries such as German, heavy industry is everywhere, yet, the number of respiratory disease incidence is much lower than some development countries such an India. All in all(in sum), the editorial should find further evidences to prove his point of view. for instance, the works FB have done that protect our environment and obvious defects that mayoral AG behaved. Moreover, the statistics about the pollution of factories and the relevance between pollution and respiratory symptom .in consideration of the experience of AG, there must be harder works make to win the election . [ Last edited by 既傻又憨 on 2011-8-15 at 16:05 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有17人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
基金不中，共勉
已经有5人回复
-
看板上这么多中的，有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉……
已经有3人回复
-
国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论
已经有5人回复
-
我不理解！
已经有23人回复
-
2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战
已经有10人回复
-
系统查不到
已经有10人回复
-
怎么查啊
已经有5人回复
-
范进中举一文的中心思想
已经有10人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 散点金币，攒人品，希望国家评审顺利通过吧
已经有128人回复
- xiayounan一篇关于银纳米线化学合成方法时，最后溶液的颜色是什么颜色
已经有23人回复
- 【讨论】GRE写作的Argument考试前要实战多少篇算OK？
已经有16人回复
5楼2011-12-27 19:55:37
6楼2011-12-27 20:03:47
7楼2012-01-06 12:18:53
简单回复
2011-08-15 21:41
chaowang3eg(金币+1): 欢迎常来噢~~ 2011-08-16 08:19:22
loveskyzhou(金币+1): 哦。。。我没有冒犯的意思，但我真不懂这花是啥意思。。。。 2011-08-16 09:46:29
loveskyzhou(金币+1): 哦。。。我没有冒犯的意思，但我真不懂这花是啥意思。。。。 2011-08-16 09:46:29
2011-08-16 08:19
2011-08-16 09:45
loveskyzhou(金币+1): 哦。。。我没有冒犯的意思，但我真不懂这花是啥意思。。。。 2011-08-16 09:46:36
