| 查看: 308 | 回复: 0 | |||
[交流]
请问有没有人遇到过这种情况
|
|
一个稿子，under review 三个月后，给springer投稿系统里面的询问信箱发了一封询问信，同时cc给了主编。结果一周后，springer的邮件地址发信告诉，稿子被拒绝了。又过了一周，主编给发信说是系统搞错了，稿子还没有被拒绝，信如下： Reference is made to your letter addressed to Professor **** inquiring about the status of your manuscript. Unfortunately our rejection of the manuscript was due to a mistake in our administrative system. The manuscript has not been rejected. Please find here our decision for a major revision which is based on the comments of our reviewers. Once again sorry for the misunderstanding. Looking forward to receiving your revised manuscript at your earliest convenience, with best regards, 审稿人提出的主要问题是样本量太小，需要标出样本量有多少（稿子中没有标出），确实样本量很少，而且无法增加。这种情况不知道如何搞，害怕白忙活一通，又给拒了，审稿意见满满五大页。 有没有人经历过这种情况，后来结果如何？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
体制内长辈说体制内绝大部分一辈子在底层，如同你们一样大部分普通教师忙且收入低
已经有11人回复
-
过年走亲戚时感受到了所开私家车的鄙视链
已经有9人回复
-
今年春晚有几个节目很不错，点赞！
已经有10人回复
-
情人节自我反思：在爱情中有过遗憾吗？
已经有10人回复
-
基金正文30页指的是报告正文还是整个申请书
已经有5人回复