| ²é¿´: 945 | »Ø¸´: 4 | ||
| ±¾Ìû²úÉú 1 ¸ö ·ÒëEPI £¬µã»÷ÕâÀï½øÐв鿴 | ||
lkys½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
Ò»¾äººÒëÓ¢ÇóÖú
|
|
|
ͨ¹ý·À»¤¿ò¼ÜÁºÕý½ØÃæÅä½î¼ÆËã½á¹ûÓëÊÔÑéÖµ±È¶Ô·¢ÏÖ£¬ÓÉÓÚ¿ò¼ÜÁº´¦ÓÚË«ÏòÅä½î״̬£¬Á½Àà·À»¤¿ò¼ÜÕý½ØÃæ³ÐÔØÁ¦ÊÔÑéÖµ¾ù´óÓÚ¼ÆËãÖµ¡£ ·À»¤¿ò¼ÜÁº the protective frame beams |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
285Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÉúÎïѧÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
0854Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
319·Ö085702°²È«¹¤³ÌÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÉúÎïѧ308·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á£¨Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ª¶«Ê¦´ó£©
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
085600²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤301·ÖÇóµ÷¼ÁԺУ
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
0703»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á325·Ö
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
ÇóÖú071001µ÷¼Á£¡£¡£¡
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
¹¤¿Æ370Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏר˶322
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´

¹Å¿É¤×
ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
- ·ÒëEPI: 323
- Ó¦Öú: 91 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ¹ó±ö: 16.835
- ½ð±Ò: 19237.1
- É¢½ð: 40372
- ºì»¨: 275
- ɳ·¢: 183
- Ìû×Ó: 25406
- ÔÚÏß: 1082.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1034379
- ×¢²á: 2010-06-02
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Ò©ÎïÉè¼ÆÓëÒ©ÎïÐÅÏ¢
- ¹ÜϽ: µ¼Ê¦ÕÐÉú
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï
sltmac(½ð±Ò+1): ллӦÖú~~ 2011-07-31 19:28:48
lkys(½ð±Ò+50, ·ÒëEPI+1): ¼ò½à£¬Çå³þ 2011-08-05 12:45:57
sltmac(½ð±Ò+1): ллӦÖú~~ 2011-07-31 19:28:48
lkys(½ð±Ò+50, ·ÒëEPI+1): ¼ò½à£¬Çå³þ 2011-08-05 12:45:57
|
normal section reinforcing barsÕý½ØÃæÅä½î bearing capacity ³ÐÔØÁ¦ Double Reinforcement Ë«ÏòÅä state In comparison by the value of calculation and experiment of normal section reinforcing bars of the protective frame beams £¬since the frame beams on the state of Double reinforcing£¬two kinds of the value of experiments are larger than calculations |

2Â¥2011-07-31 18:09:05
Carena
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
- ·ÒëEPI: 94
- Ó¦Öú: 5 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.542
- ½ð±Ò: 6371.2
- É¢½ð: 8657
- ºì»¨: 55
- ɳ·¢: 23
- Ìû×Ó: 5968
- ÔÚÏß: 357.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1049282
- ×¢²á: 2010-06-29
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: Íâ¹úÓïÑÔ
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï
sltmac(½ð±Ò+1): лл½»Á÷~~ 2011-07-31 21:45:53
sltmac(½ð±Ò+1): лл½»Á÷~~ 2011-07-31 21:45:53
| we found out by comparing the value of calculation and the value of experiment of normal section reinforcement of the protective frame beams that the value of experiment of both two protective frame beams¡¯ bearing capacity was higher than that their correspondent value of calculation due to their two-way reinforcement status. |

3Â¥2011-07-31 20:04:56
wust67
½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- ·ÒëEPI: 54
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.005
- ½ð±Ò: 921.3
- É¢½ð: 175
- ºì»¨: 7
- Ìû×Ó: 1627
- ÔÚÏß: 339.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1009964
- ×¢²á: 2010-05-02
- רҵ: ¸ß·Ö×Ӻϳɻ¯Ñ§
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï
sltmac(½ð±Ò+1): »¶Ó½»Á÷~~ 2011-07-31 21:46:00
sltmac(½ð±Ò+1): »¶Ó½»Á÷~~ 2011-07-31 21:46:00
|
ͨ¹ý·À»¤¿ò¼ÜÁºÕý½ØÃæÅä½î¼ÆËã½á¹ûÓëÊÔÑéÖµ±È¶Ô·¢ÏÖ£¬ In comparison of the calculated and experimental values of the normal section reinforcing bars of the protective frame beams, |
4Â¥2011-07-31 20:27:49
phu_grassman
ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
¿ìÀÖµº¡¢²¼¼ªµºµºÖ÷
- ·ÒëEPI: 265
- Ó¦Öú: 7 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 1.392
- ½ð±Ò: 7538.7
- É¢½ð: 11599
- ºì»¨: 107
- ɳ·¢: 11
- Ìû×Ó: 5611
- ÔÚÏß: 1480.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1151372
- ×¢²á: 2010-11-20
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§
- ¹ÜϽ: English Cafe
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï
sltmac(½ð±Ò+1): ¸ÐлӦÖú~ 2011-08-03 21:43:19
sltmac(½ð±Ò+1): ¸ÐлӦÖú~ 2011-08-03 21:43:19
By comparing the calculated value with the exprimental value of the protective frame beams' normal section reinforcing bars , we found that the test values of the normal section bearing capacity of two kind of protective frame beams were larger than the calculated values due to the double reinforcement of the frame beams. |
5Â¥2011-08-03 20:10:20














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥