| 查看: 1077 | 回复: 1 | ||
[求助]
第一篇sci-International Journal of Coal Geology 二次审稿意见分析求助？
|
|
Dear Mr. ..., I can now inform you that your manuscript has been evaluated by 3 reviewers. As you will see from the appended comments and attached comments/concerns and marked manuscripts, major revision has been requested. However, please take this as a provisional revision request meaning that if the comments are not fully addressed and the manuscript is not submitted in a fully acceptable shape, it may be rejected for further consideration. This action is because this is the second submission of this paper and we expected that it would come back with an acceptable shape, technically and editorially. Otherwise your lack of attention to requests are taking too much of time going the same things over and over again. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
套磁信没有回复
已经有9人回复
-
还有，jjw不发布ABC的动机是什么呢？
已经有5人回复
-
核磁解谱
已经有17人回复
-
博士毕业16，两中两民；
已经有10人回复
-
浙江大学生物学博导推荐
已经有6人回复
-
作者署名：nature大子刊共一还是共同通讯？
已经有21人回复
-
跑板分纯
已经有3人回复
-
有没有便宜一点的开源期刊
已经有8人回复
-
大家慎重选择南科大李文甲
已经有7人回复
-
论文投稿
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
west1982
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 15 (小学生)
- 金币: 1788.1
- 散金: 1669
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 957
- 在线: 317.4小时
- 虫号: 1326957
- 注册: 2011-06-19
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 高电压与绝缘
2楼2011-07-30 21:35:14
50