| 查看: 1181 | 回复: 15 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
投APL，我的文章状态，请帮忙分析
|
|||
|
修改稿投上去几天了，还没有结果，大家帮忙 Stage Start Date Editorial Evaluation - Editor 2011-07-22 01:40:17 Under Review 2011-07-22 01:35:40 Securing Reviewer(s) 2011-07-20 11:30:52 Under Consideration - Editorial Office 2011-07-18 13:22:20 Author-Approved Files Submitted 2011-07-18 13:22:20 Under Consideration - Editorial Office 2011-07-18 13:22:19 Submission Check Complete 2011-07-18 13:22:19 Submission Check - Editorial Office 2011-07-17 23:49:11 Author-Approved Files Submitted 2011-07-17 23:49:11 Preliminary Manuscript Data Posted 2011-07-14 20:34:39 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
参与限项
已经有3人回复
-
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求
已经有7人回复
-
实验室接单子
已经有4人回复
-
全日制（定向）博士
已经有4人回复
-
对氯苯硼酸纯化
已经有3人回复
-
求助:我三月中下旬出站，青基依托单位怎么办？
已经有12人回复
-
不自信的我
已经有12人回复
-
所感
已经有4人回复
-
要不要辞职读博？
已经有7人回复
-
北核录用
已经有3人回复
|
APL的这个意见，能修改再投吗，大修？大家给点建议。再投否？ DEAR Thank you for submitting your manuscript, referenced below, to APL. We have examined your paper, and our consensus is that it does not contain a strong component of new applied physics and does not meet the timeliness requirement for rapid publication in this Letters Journal. We are therefore returning the manuscript so that you can seek publication elsewhere. As you may be aware, we receive many more papers than we can accept, and many of them are in competitive sub-fields. Consequently, we are compelled to reduce our coverage of certain areas, even though they may have appeared in our pages in the past. Such decisions are difficult but are necessary to control the explosion in Journal size. We wish to make it clear that this is not a reflection of the technical quality of your work but rather of our discipline and stringent space limitations. Sincerely yours, |
13楼2011-07-26 11:57:56
eseayl
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 29 (小学生)
- 金币: 17485.7
- 散金: 1913
- 红花: 36
- 帖子: 3126
- 在线: 2883小时
- 虫号: 590286
- 注册: 2008-08-31
- 专业: 地层学
2楼2011-07-25 17:42:27
3楼2011-07-25 17:44:38
4楼2011-07-25 17:51:57