| 查看: 1234 | 回复: 15 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
投APL，我的文章状态，请帮忙分析
|
|||
|
修改稿投上去几天了，还没有结果，大家帮忙 Stage Start Date Editorial Evaluation - Editor 2011-07-22 01:40:17 Under Review 2011-07-22 01:35:40 Securing Reviewer(s) 2011-07-20 11:30:52 Under Consideration - Editorial Office 2011-07-18 13:22:20 Author-Approved Files Submitted 2011-07-18 13:22:20 Under Consideration - Editorial Office 2011-07-18 13:22:19 Submission Check Complete 2011-07-18 13:22:19 Submission Check - Editorial Office 2011-07-17 23:49:11 Author-Approved Files Submitted 2011-07-17 23:49:11 Preliminary Manuscript Data Posted 2011-07-14 20:34:39 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
体制内长辈说体制内绝大部分一辈子在底层，如同你们一样大部分普通教师忙且收入低
已经有10人回复
-
过年走亲戚时感受到了所开私家车的鄙视链
已经有9人回复
-
今年春晚有几个节目很不错，点赞！
已经有10人回复
-
情人节自我反思：在爱情中有过遗憾吗？
已经有10人回复
-
基金正文30页指的是报告正文还是整个申请书
已经有5人回复
|
APL的这个意见，能修改再投吗，大修？大家给点建议。再投否？ DEAR Thank you for submitting your manuscript, referenced below, to APL. We have examined your paper, and our consensus is that it does not contain a strong component of new applied physics and does not meet the timeliness requirement for rapid publication in this Letters Journal. We are therefore returning the manuscript so that you can seek publication elsewhere. As you may be aware, we receive many more papers than we can accept, and many of them are in competitive sub-fields. Consequently, we are compelled to reduce our coverage of certain areas, even though they may have appeared in our pages in the past. Such decisions are difficult but are necessary to control the explosion in Journal size. We wish to make it clear that this is not a reflection of the technical quality of your work but rather of our discipline and stringent space limitations. Sincerely yours, |
13楼2011-07-26 11:57:56
eseayl
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 29 (小学生)
- 金币: 17545.7
- 散金: 1913
- 红花: 36
- 帖子: 3126
- 在线: 2886.4小时
- 虫号: 590286
- 注册: 2008-08-31
- 专业: 地层学
2楼2011-07-25 17:42:27
3楼2011-07-25 17:44:38
4楼2011-07-25 17:51:57