| ²é¿´: 346 | »Ø¸´: 4 | |||
| ±¾Ìû²úÉú 1 ¸ö ·ÒëEPI £¬µã»÷ÕâÀï½øÐв鿴 | |||
tata118119½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[ÇóÖú]
°ïæУ¶Ô2¾ä
|
||
|
1.ʵÑéÑùÆ·±»·ÖΪ3×飬1×éÓÃFD¸ÉÔ1×éÓÐEHD¸ÉÔ1×éÓÃEHFD¸ÉÔï One group underwent FD drying. One group was subjected to EHD drying, and the other group was carried out by EHFD techniques. 2.ËäÈ»EHD¸ÉÔï¼¼ÊõÏûºÄµÄÄܺĺÜС£¬µ«ËüËù¸ÉÔïµÄ²úÆ·Æ·ÖÊûÓÐFDµÄºÃ£¬ÇÒËüµÄºóÆÚ¸ÉÔïËٶȽÏÂý¡£ EHD drying is more efficient in terms of energy saving. But, the product quality dried by EHD is more poor than that of FD.and the rate of EHD is slower than that of FD in the later process |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
347²ÄÁÏר˶Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
Çó¿¼ÑвÄÁϵ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
ÉúÎïѧ308·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á£¨Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ª¶«Ê¦´ó£©×ö¹ý·Ö×ÓʵÑé
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
¼ÆËã»ú408£üÔÚУ¶à´Î¹ú¼Ò¼¶¾ºÈü»ñ½±£üÉêÇëµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
388Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
288Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ29È˻ظ´
266µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
304Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
zerohead
½û³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- ·ÒëEPI: 466
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.301
- ½ð±Ò: 8727.8
- É¢½ð: 850
- ºì»¨: 15
- ɳ·¢: 10
- Ìû×Ó: 3768
- ÔÚÏß: 471.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1041741
- ×¢²á: 2010-06-14
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Â߼ѧ
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï
Mally89(½ð±Ò+1): ¸ÐлӦÖú£¡~ 2011-07-13 21:11:38
Mally89(½ð±Ò+1): ¸ÐлӦÖú£¡~ 2011-07-13 21:11:38
|
1.ʵÑéÑùÆ·±»·ÖΪ3×飬1×éÓÃFD¸ÉÔ1×éÓÐEHD¸ÉÔ1×éÓÃEHFD¸ÉÔï One group underwent FD drying. One group was subjected to EHD drying, and the other group was carried out by EHFD techniques. The samples were divided into 3 groups underwent different drying regimes, one for FD drying, one for EHD drying, and the other one for EHFD drying. |
2Â¥2011-07-13 19:13:58
wust67
½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- ·ÒëEPI: 54
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.005
- ½ð±Ò: 921.3
- É¢½ð: 175
- ºì»¨: 7
- Ìû×Ó: 1627
- ÔÚÏß: 339.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1009964
- ×¢²á: 2010-05-02
- רҵ: ¸ß·Ö×Ӻϳɻ¯Ñ§
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï
Mally89(½ð±Ò+1): ¸ÐлӦÖú£¡~ 2011-07-13 21:11:59
tata118119(½ð±Ò+10, ·ÒëEPI+1): 2011-07-14 16:05:38
Mally89(½ð±Ò+1): ¸ÐлӦÖú£¡~ 2011-07-13 21:11:59
tata118119(½ð±Ò+10, ·ÒëEPI+1): 2011-07-14 16:05:38
|
There samples (labled as group 1, 2 and 3) were dried by FD, EHD, EHFD, respectively. À¨ºÅµÄÄÚÈÝ¿´ÓÐÎÞ±ØÒª½»´ú£¬ÎÞÐèÇ¿µ÷Ôò¿Éɾµô¡£ Though EHD drying is energy-efficient, its drying quality is inferior to that of FD, besides, its drying rate is slow in the later stage. |
3Â¥2011-07-13 19:14:43
wust67
½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- ·ÒëEPI: 54
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.005
- ½ð±Ò: 921.3
- É¢½ð: 175
- ºì»¨: 7
- Ìû×Ó: 1627
- ÔÚÏß: 339.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1009964
- ×¢²á: 2010-05-02
- רҵ: ¸ß·Ö×Ӻϳɻ¯Ñ§
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
|
Three samples (labled as group 1, 2 and 3) were dried by FD, EHD, EHFD, respectively. À¨ºÅµÄÄÚÈÝ¿´ÓÐÎÞ±ØÒª½»´ú£¬ÎÞÐèÇ¿µ÷Ôò¿Éɾµô¡£ Though EHD drying is energy-efficient, its drying quality is inferior to that of FD, besides, its drying rate is slow in the later stage. |
4Â¥2011-07-13 19:16:06
zerohead
½û³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- ·ÒëEPI: 466
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.301
- ½ð±Ò: 8727.8
- É¢½ð: 850
- ºì»¨: 15
- ɳ·¢: 10
- Ìû×Ó: 3768
- ÔÚÏß: 471.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1041741
- ×¢²á: 2010-06-14
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Â߼ѧ
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
tata118119(½ð±Ò+10): 2011-07-14 16:07:06
|
2.ËäÈ»EHD¸ÉÔï¼¼ÊõÏûºÄµÄÄܺĺÜС£¬µ«ËüËù¸ÉÔïµÄ²úÆ·Æ·ÖÊûÓÐFDµÄºÃ£¬ÇÒËüµÄºóÆÚ¸ÉÔïËٶȽÏÂý¡£ EHD drying is more efficient in terms of energy saving. But the resultant product quality dried by EHD is poor than (or not as good as) that by FD. Moreover, the drying rate of EHD is slower than that of FD in the later stage. |
5Â¥2011-07-13 19:18:24














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥