| 查看: 1935 | 回复: 20 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
zhongma88619木虫 (著名写手)
|
[求助]
编辑给的退稿信，大侠帮我看看，有多大戏？（截止时间2011.6.25）
|
|
|
退稿意见： Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they have identified a number of problems with your work that are quite major. Therefore I must reject it. However, your paper does have merit. Thus, if you consider carefully their comments, you may be able to make major changes/additions and present your work or provide new results in a way that would be more convincing. If so, I would be happy to reconsider it as a new submission and get a completely new set of reviews by a different group of reviewers. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. 谢谢！多谢指导！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
2025年遐想
已经有4人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
-
自然科学基金委宣布启动申请书“瘦身提质”行动
已经有4人回复
-
求个博导看看
已经有18人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 请各位大侠帮忙看看，我的条件申请CSC有多大把握？真心谢谢各位赐教！
已经有15人回复
- 一天退稿，悲剧，帮偶看看退稿意见吧
已经有13人回复
- 首次发SCI，回复中需要re-submission。恐对编辑意思理解有偏差，望各位指点！
已经有13人回复
- JPCC 回复了 ，如下，让我选编辑，请大侠看看是什么意思？
已经有18人回复
kqp1982
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 41 (小学生)
- 金币: 1617.8
- 散金: 1693
- 红花: 18
- 帖子: 1214
- 在线: 484.2小时
- 虫号: 112015
- 注册: 2005-11-21
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 化学工程及工业化学
2楼2011-06-22 13:10:43