24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

wshxjx

金虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1597.9
散金: 35
红花: 1
帖子: 60
在线: 106.6小时
虫号: 1125113
注册: 2010-10-17
专业: 土壤学

[求助] 这个问题怎么回答？有关“Bonferoni or Students Newman-Keuls”，谢谢！

审稿人的返修意见：
[Comment ] is a Duncan’s least significant difference the same as Duncan’s multiple Range test? Is this the best test for comparing among so many means or would Bonferoni or Students Newman-Keuls be more appropriate? A justification statement and reference is what I am suggesting.
You are comparing among all treatments not treatments to the control, is this correct?

这个问题怎么回答？有关“Bonferoni or Students Newman-Keuls”，不懂，请统计高手指教，谢谢！

[Response ] You suggest a good comment. Bonferoni or Students Newman-Keuls is more appropriate. But Duncan’s least significant difference (LSD) test can compare among more than two means. Duncan’s LSD test was also use in the citations of this paper to compare among more than two means, such as Sainju et al. (2008) for 11 treatment means and Bhattacharyya et al. (2010) for 6 treatment means.

Sainju, U.M., Senwo, Z.N., Nyakatawa, E.Z., Tazisong, I.A., Reddy, K.C., 2008. Soil carbon and nitrogen sequestration as affected by long-term tillage, cropping systems, and nitrogen fertilizer sources. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 127(3-4):234-240. [doi:10.1016/j.agee.2008.04.006]
Bhattacharyya, R., Prakash, V., Kundu, S., Srivastva, A.K., Gupta, H.S., Mitra, S., 2010. Long term effects of fertilization on carbon and nitrogen sequestration and aggregate associated carbon and nitrogen in the Indian sub-Himalayas. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys 86(1):1-16. [DOI 10.1007/s10705-009-9270-y]

一般可以用LSD比较多个平均数的显著差异啊。我的回答如上，不知审稿人同意不？

回复此楼