| ²é¿´: 342 | »Ø¸´: 1 | |||
| ±¾Ìû²úÉú 1 ¸ö ·ÒëEPI £¬µã»÷ÕâÀï½øÐв鿴 | |||
lzq1985½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
·ÒëÒ»¶Î»°
|
||
| ¿ÉÒÔ¿´³ö£¬ËäÈ»EPU1ÈȽµ½âζȲ» ÏñEPU2ÄÇô¸ß£¬EPU2µÄÈȽµ½âÆðʼζÈԼΪ300.2¡æ£¬Õâ±ÈEPU1µÄÈȽµ½âÆðʼζȸß30¶È¡£ÕâÒâζ×ÅEPU2µÄÈÈÎȶ¨ÐÔ±ÈEPU1¸ß¡£ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
290·Ö²ÄÁϹ¤³Ì085601Çóµ÷¼Á Êý¶þÓ¢Ò»
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
085602»¯Ñ§¹¤³Ì350£¬µ÷¼Á£¬ÓÐûÓÐ211µÄ
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
268Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
0856²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤£¬270Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
321Çóµ÷¼ÁÒ»Ö¾Ô¸¶«±±ÁÖÒµ´óѧ²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤Ó¢¶þÊý¶þ
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
³É¹ûϵͳ·ÃÎÊÁ¿´ó£¬Çë15·ÖÖÓºóÔÙ³¢ÊÔ¡£Óɴ˸øÄúÔì³ÉµÄ²»±ã£¬¾´ÇëÁ½⡣
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
295Çóµ÷¼Á¡£Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±¨¿¼Ö£ÖÝ´óѧ»¯Ñ§¹¤ÒÕѧ˶£¬×Ü·Ö295·Ö
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
289Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
0856µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
zerohead
½û³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- ·ÒëEPI: 466
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.301
- ½ð±Ò: 8727.8
- É¢½ð: 850
- ºì»¨: 15
- ɳ·¢: 10
- Ìû×Ó: 3768
- ÔÚÏß: 471.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1041741
- ×¢²á: 2010-06-14
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Â߼ѧ
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï
lzq1985(½ð±Ò+5, ·ÒëEPI+1): лл 2011-06-09 16:16:51
Mally89(½ð±Ò+1): ¸ÐлӦÖú£¡~ 2011-06-09 20:18:52
lzq1985(½ð±Ò+5, ·ÒëEPI+1): лл 2011-06-09 16:16:51
Mally89(½ð±Ò+1): ¸ÐлӦÖú£¡~ 2011-06-09 20:18:52
|
¿ÉÒÔ¿´³ö£¬ËäÈ»EPU1ÈȽµ½âζȲ» ÏñEPU2ÄÇô¸ß£¬EPU2µÄÈȽµ½âÆðʼζÈԼΪ300.2¡æ£¬Õâ±ÈEPU1µÄÈȽµ½âÆðʼζȸß30¶È¡£ÕâÒâζ×ÅEPU2µÄÈÈÎȶ¨ÐÔ±ÈEPU1¸ß¡£ It can be seen that although the thermal degradation temperature of EPU1 is lower than that of EPU2, the thermal degradation onset temperature of EPU2 is about 300.2 ¡æ, which is 30 ¡æ higher than that of EPU1. That means the thermal stability of EPU2 is higher than EPU1. |
2Â¥2011-06-09 16:12:20













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥