Znn3bq.jpeg
²é¿´: 1274  |  »Ø¸´: 1
±¾Ìû²úÉú 1 ¸ö ·­ÒëEPI £¬µã»÷ÕâÀï½øÐв鿴

ÑÌÔÆÌýÓê

Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)

½ð³æ

[ÇóÖú] Çó·­ÒëÒ»¶ÎÓ¢ÎÄÎÄÏ×£¨Ò©»¯£©

Next, a total of 104 synthetic Stemona analogues were
selected for screening as described above [Fig. 3; for the complete
binding data (numeric ¦Êi values) and compound identity, see
Dataset S1]. The entries in Fig. 3 are grouped according to compound
class as indicated in Scheme 2. Several patterns become
discernable when analyzed from this perspective. The reductive
amination compounds, derived primarily from aryl-containing
amines, tended to possess hit profiles against the GPCR panel
of greater potency and lower selectivity than most other compound
classes. Similar trends of potency and selectivity were
observed for the indole compound set. The Friedländer quinoline
analogues displayed a more balanced activity/selectivity profile,
whereas the carbamate analogue compound set, which lacks
any basic nitrogen, demonstrated more modest binding activity.
The results obtained for the twelve representative analogues displayed
in Fig. 4 demonstrate these trends. Although compounds
possessing submicromolar affinities for multiple classes of GPCR
targets (e.g., adrenergic, muscarinic, serotonin, dopaminergic
and Sig-R classes) emerged as possible hits for further investigation,
we were most interested in a clustering of basic, nitrogencontaining
compounds displaying potent affinity for the Sig-Rs
(compounds 6{1¨C3, 8, and 9}). Of secondary interest was the
adrenergic binding of the tertiary amines derived from the amide
reduction of the core scaffolds. Thus, 6{10} possessed analpha1D Ki of 18 nM with no additional binding of <10;000 nM,and 6{11} possessed an alpha1D Ki of 208 nM and a sigma2 Ki of 5,970 nM.

» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶

ÄîÄî²»Íü£¬±ØÓлØÏì
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

rongfang

½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)

¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû

ÑÌÔÆÌýÓê(½ð±Ò+35, ·­ÒëEPI+1): лл 2011-06-09 23:25:01
Next, a total of 104 synthetic Stemona analogues were selected for screening as described above [Fig. 3; for the complete binding data (numeric ¦Êi values) and compound identity, see Dataset S1].
½Ó×Å£¬¹²ÓÐ104Öֺϳɵİٲ¿ÀàËÆÎï¿É¹©ÈçÉÏËùÊöµÄɸѡ¡¾Í¼3£»ÕâÑù×öÒ²ÊÇΪÁËÍê³É°ó¶¨Êý¾Ý£¨ÊýÖµkiÖµ£©¼°»¯ºÏÎïµÄÖÖÀà¼ø¶¨£¬¼ûS1Êý¾Ý¼¯¡¿
The entries in Fig. 3 are grouped according to compound class as indicated in Scheme 2.
ͼ3ÖеÄÌõÄ¿ÊÇÒÀ¾Ý±í2ÖÐÏÔʾµÄ»¯ºÏÎïÀàÀ´·Ö×éµÄ¡£
Several patterns become discernable when analyzed from this perspective.
´ÓÒÔÉÏÕâ¸ö½Ç¶È·ÖÎö¿ÉÖª£¬Õ⼸ÖÖģʽÊÇÓм£¿ÉѰµÄ¡£
The reductive amination compounds, derived primarily from aryl-containing amines, tended to possess hit profiles against the GPCR panel of greater potency and lower selectivity than most other compound classes.
Ö÷ÒªÊÇ´Ó·¼»·°·À໯ºÏÎïÖÐÑÜÉúµÄ°·À໯ºÏÎïµÄ»¹Ô­£¬ÍùÍù¾ßÓÐÒÀ¿¿Óиü´óЧÄܵÄGµ°°×żÁªÊÜÌåµÄ¸Å¿ö£¬ÒÔ¼°±È´ó¶àÊýÆäËû»¯ºÏÎïÀà¸üµÍµÄÑ¡ÔñÐÔ¡£
Similar trends of potency and selectivity were observed for the indole compound set. ÀàËÆµÄЧÄܺÍÑ¡ÔñÐÔÇ÷ÊÆÔÚßÅßáÀ໯ºÏÎïÖÐÒ²Äܹ»¹Û²ìµ½¡£
The Friedländer quinoline analogues displayed a more balanced activity/ selectivity profile, whereas the carbamate analogue compound set, which lacks any basic nitrogen, demonstrated more modest binding activity.
FriedläÖ¸³ö£¬à­ßøÀàËÆÎï±íÏÖ³ö¸ü¼ÓƽºâµÄ»îÐÔ/Ñ¡ÔñÐÔ£¬¶ø°±»ù¼×Ëáõ¥À໯ºÏÎÒòΪȱ·¦»ùµª£¬¶ø±íÏÖ³ö¸ü¼Óκ͵ĽáºÏ»îÐÔ¡£
The results obtained for the twelve representative analogues displayed in Fig. 4 demonstrate these trends.
ͼ4ÖеÄ12¸ö´ú±íÐÔµÄÀàËÆÎïµÄ½á¹ûÏÔʾÁËÕâÖÖÇ÷ÊÆ¡£
Although compounds possessing submicromolar affinities for multiple classes of GPCR targets (e.g., adrenergic, muscarinic, serotonin, dopaminergic and Sig-R classes) emerged as possible hits for further investigation, we were most interested in a clustering of basic, nitrogencontaining compounds displaying potent affinity for the Sig-Rs (compounds 6{1¨C3, 8, and 9}).
ËäÈ»ÓÉÓÚÓжàÀàÐ͵ÄGµ°°×żÁªÊÜÌåÄ¿±êÎÈçÉöÉÏÏÙËØ£¬µ¨¼î£¬ÑªÇåËØ£¬¶à°Í°·ÒÔ¼°Sig-RÀࣩ¶øÊ¹µÃ»¯ºÏÎïµÄÇ׺ÍÁ¦½ÏµÍ£¬µ«ÕâÖÖÇé¿öµÄ³öÏÖ¶ÔÓÚ½øÒ»²½µÄµ÷²é·ÃÎÊÒ²ÊÇÓÐÁ¦µÄ¡£ ÎÒÃÇ×î¸ÐÐËȤµÄ¾ÛÀà»ù±¾Îº¬µªÀ໯ºÏÎïÔÚSig- RÉÏÏÔʾ³öÇ¿´óµÄÇ׺ÍÁ¦£¨»¯ºÏÎï6{1-3£¬8£¬9}£©¡£
Of secondary interest was the adrenergic binding of the tertiary amines derived from the amide reduction of the core scaffolds.
õ£°·»¹Ô­µÄÑÜÉúÎïÈçÈý¼¶°·£¬ÆäÓëÉöÉÏÏÙËØÊÜÌåµÄ½áºÏÒ²ÊÇÎÒÃǽÓ×ÅÐèÒªÑо¿µÄ¡£
2Â¥2011-06-09 21:10:07
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
Ïà¹Ø°æ¿éÌø×ª ÎÒÒª¶©ÔÄÂ¥Ö÷ ÑÌÔÆÌýÓê µÄÖ÷Ìâ¸üÐÂ
×î¾ßÈËÆøÈÈÌûÍÆ¼ö [²é¿´È«²¿] ×÷Õß »Ø/¿´ ×îºó·¢±í
[¿¼ÑÐ] 280Çóµ÷¼Á +13 wzzzÍõ 2026-04-09 13/650 2026-04-12 00:31 by ÓÂÅʸ߷å0126
[¿¼ÑÐ] 0831Ò»ÂÖµ÷¼Áʧ°ÜÇóÖú +6 СÐÜî£î£_s 2026-04-11 6/300 2026-04-11 23:55 by baobaoye
[¿¼ÑÐ] µç×ÓÐÅÏ¢270Çóµ÷¼Á +14 terminal469 2026-04-07 14/700 2026-04-11 19:44 by laoshidan
[¿¼ÑÐ] 296Çóµ÷¼Á +13 Íô£¡£¿£¡ 2026-04-10 15/750 2026-04-11 10:31 by ÄæË®³Ë·ç
[¿¼ÑÐ] 297Çóµ÷¼Á +9 Kwgyz 2026-04-09 9/450 2026-04-11 10:09 by zhq0425
[¿¼ÑÐ] 0854µ÷¼Á +4 ³¤¹­°Á 2026-04-09 4/200 2026-04-11 09:18 by Öí»á·É
[¿¼ÑÐ] ÉúÎïѧ308Çóµ÷¼Á£¨Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ª¶«Ê¦´ó£© +6 ÏàÐűػá¹ââÍòÕ 2026-04-10 6/300 2026-04-11 05:23 by zhuwenxu
[¿¼ÑÐ] 326Çóµ÷¼Á +5 Shansyn 2026-04-10 5/250 2026-04-10 22:23 by Öí»á·É
[¿¼ÑÐ] 314Çóµ÷¼Á +23 wakeluofu 2026-04-09 24/1200 2026-04-10 15:31 by MOF_Catal
[¿¼ÑÐ] µ÷¼ÁÉêÇë086000Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Î÷±±Å©ÁֿƼ¼´óѧÉúÎïÓëÒ½Ò©320·Ö-±¾¿ÆÆë³¹¤Òµ´óѧ +3 ÃÀÃÀŮʿ 2026-04-09 3/150 2026-04-10 10:31 by liuhuiying09
[¿¼ÑÐ] 292Çóµ÷¼Á +9 ЦЦԬ 2026-04-09 9/450 2026-04-10 10:05 by LHGeng
[¿¼ÑÐ] 284Çóµ÷¼Á +7 ÈÃÎÒÉϰ¶°É°¢Î÷ 2026-04-09 7/350 2026-04-09 18:59 by haironglove
[¿¼ÑÐ] ²ÄÁÏ299ר˶Çóµ÷¼Á +10 +21 2026-04-09 10/500 2026-04-09 17:34 by 1753564080
[¿¼ÑÐ] ²ÄÁÏר˶322 +14 ¹þ¹þ¹þºðºðºð¹þ 2026-04-05 14/700 2026-04-09 13:25 by 5268321
[¿¼ÑÐ] 286Çóµ÷¼Á +19 Faune 2026-04-08 20/1000 2026-04-09 08:36 by ŶŶ123
[¿¼²©] ²ÄÁÏ·½Ïò¿¼²©£¬ÇóÍÆ¼ö +3 ÑÔÓïaaa 2026-04-05 4/200 2026-04-08 22:22 by nxgogo
[¿¼ÑÐ] 11408 325·Ö +3 jgtxuxgkx 2026-04-07 3/150 2026-04-07 23:10 by lbsjt
[¿¼ÑÐ] 085405Èí¼þ¹¤³Ì301·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á£¬×¨Ë¶¿É¿çרҵ£¬ËÄÁù¼¶Òѹý +3 ¾²¾²ÏëÏë 2026-04-05 3/150 2026-04-06 15:23 by nepu_uu
[¿¼ÑÐ] 327Çóµ÷¼Á +4 ʰ¹âÈÎȾ 2026-04-05 4/200 2026-04-05 20:16 by ÄϺ½~ÍòÀÏʦ
[¿¼ÑÐ] ¿¼Ñе÷¼ÁÉúѰÕÒµ¼Ê¦ +3 ¹ËÕ°¿¼Ñа¡ 2026-04-05 3/150 2026-04-05 18:18 by à£à£à£0119
ÐÅÏ¢Ìáʾ
ÇëÌî´¦ÀíÒâ¼û