| 查看: 2508 | 回复: 1 | ||
zhou_jun木虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
关于论文修改的求助
|
|
最近投稿总是不太顺利，所以来向各位求助，希望大家多帮帮忙。先谢谢了。 在今年1月份投出去一篇文章，3月份得到回复如下： Dear Mr. ***, We have received the referee's comments on your paper titled "***", which indicate that it is not appropriate for publication in *** in its present form. Please revise your manuscript as suggested and submit a detailed response to the referee, including a detailed description of the revisions made in the paper. The revised manuscript and response are due by May 7, 2011 via the PXP web site. These will then be sent back to the referee for further review. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Reviewer Comments: This paper describe implementation and application of the *** code, and its input and output graphical infrastructure. The authors have been very successful in this large project. Their algorithms as described are well established in prior practice, as cited in the references. Other algorithms and methods, e.g. ***, and ***, are not described. Results are verified by comparison to other codes. The development and verification of the code is a creditable accomplishment in providing the authors with a powerful modeling tool. However this reviewer does not find new algorithms or methods, nor new physics or device results, in these manuscripts. Publication in *** is not recommended. 从审稿人的意见来看，先是肯定了我们的研究工作（当然也可能是客套话），但最后还是由于没有提出新的物理和方法，不建议发表。我们按照审稿人的意见，对内容进行了修改和充实，在4月份重新投过去，5月初收到回复如下： Dear Mr. ***, We have received the referee's report on your paper titled "***" The referee's comments indicate that the paper is not appropriate for publication. You may choose to revise your manuscript to address the referee's concerns. If you do, you must submit a detailed response to the referee along with the revised manuscript. The revised manuscript is due by July 9, 2011 via the PXP web site. The Editors will then make the decision on the next step in the review process. Please feel free to contact the Editorial Office if you have any questions or concerns. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Reviewer Comments: In comparison to the original manuscript, the changes found are mainly a discussion of optimization of . There is no evidence that they have advanced the state of that art. The main body of algorithms as described are well established in prior practice and documented in publications. This reviewer still does not find new physics or results in this revision. In the development of the code, the authors have assembled a good selection of algorithms and infrastructure to fit their computer facility and applications. They then carefully verify their codes by comparison with previous results. This is a systematic, laudable development of their modeling capability. But I believe the manuscript does not "contain significant new research contributions" (item 1 in "Publication Standards and Review Procedures). Publication in *** is not recommended. 审稿意见还是部分肯定后无情地拒绝了。这估计是编辑给我的最后一次修改和解释的机会了，请帮忙看看怎么来回复这种审稿意见。（ps：这篇文章是关于我们开发的一款大型科学计算程序的，实现起来工作量很大，耗费了好几年的心血，目前应用情况良好。这方面研究国内还很少，但就是因为算法上在国外已趋于成熟，投稿到国外英文应用物理类期刊很费周折。如果这次还是不中，不知转投到IEEE系列期刊是否更合适一些。） |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
今天务委会开完了，明天出结果吗
已经有8人回复
-
在坚冰还盖着北海的时候，我看到了怒放的梅花。
已经有7人回复
-
今日不放榜？网传国自然预计 8 月 27 日可查结果
已经有22人回复
-
某些机构，以效率低为荣，以效率低作为存在感
已经有9人回复
-
放榜前的不淡定
已经有18人回复
-
什么时候开奖？
已经有13人回复
-
如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑，不妨来听听这首《基金之外》
已经有8人回复
-
没有任何消息-是不是就凉了
已经有10人回复
-
人气不行了
已经有11人回复
-
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有22人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 论文被退回，说是英文水平达不到要求，求助高人哪里有较好的论文修改公司？
已经有9人回复
- 论文修改意见求助
已经有27人回复
- 求助英文文章修改方面的问题
已经有6人回复
- 《表面技术》修改意见求助
已经有8人回复
- 【求助】修改英文论文的靠谱人士
已经有8人回复
- 20币求助论文摘要翻译修改，希望翻译的专业点
已经有1人回复
- 修改稿求助
已经有7人回复
- 求助关于论文修改！！！请大家多多指教....................
已经有4人回复
- 紧急求助，关于新投稿外审前修改
已经有6人回复
- 求助，关于修改稿的问题
已经有7人回复
- 求助：论文修改稿怎样发给编辑？
已经有8人回复
- 论文语法错误修改求助
已经有7人回复
- 求助：关于文章大修
已经有15人回复
- 求助关于修改稿投APL
已经有15人回复
visitor958
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
IEEE杂志与会议专家
- 应助: 2283 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.05
- 金币: 17310.5
- 散金: 2544
- 红花: 76
- 帖子: 15735
- 在线: 2926.6小时
- 虫号: 489254
- 注册: 2008-01-01
- 专业: IEEE
2楼2011-05-17 22:43:41
20