| 查看: 440 | 回复: 2 | ||
[求助]
大家帮我分析一下主编的评论以及如何修改！
|
|
投了篇文章，两个审稿人给了修改意见并认为文章give new and important data，但都认为3 samples are not enough for sensory evaluation，主编也提了一些修改意见，下边是主编的信: Dear XX, >The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. in particular both reviewers indicated that 3 samples are not enough for sensory evaluation. >However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. >Two attachments are sent as well and in addition by separate Email. >Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. > >I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. 请大家分析下3 samples are not enough for sensory evaluation，这样的问题如何回答，修改后能否接受，谢谢！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
信息学部会评时间
已经有3人回复
-
祈祷青基必中
已经有9人回复
-
2026年面上项目中了，2A+B, 会评顺利通过
已经有15人回复
-
在职考研
已经有7人回复
-
MSER送审了还被拒稿
已经有5人回复
-
关于如何从代码看上不上会
已经有14人回复
-
硝基还原
已经有5人回复
-
化学口会评？应用基础研究和基础研究，希望能分开
已经有3人回复
-
今年E04面上
已经有21人回复
-
b口会评
已经有5人回复
visitor958
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
IEEE杂志与会议专家
- 应助: 2283 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.05
- 金币: 17310.5
- 散金: 2544
- 红花: 76
- 帖子: 15735
- 在线: 2926.6小时
- 虫号: 489254
- 注册: 2008-01-01
- 专业: IEEE
2楼2011-05-09 20:35:31
sakkima
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 4751.2
- 散金: 226
- 帖子: 2060
- 在线: 111.3小时
- 虫号: 492520
- 注册: 2008-01-09
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 核技术及其应用
3楼2011-05-09 21:11:53