| ²é¿´: 4626 | »Ø¸´: 19 | ||||
| ¡¾½±Àø¡¿ ±¾Ìû±»ÆÀ¼Û1´Î£¬×÷ÕßchrinideÔö¼Ó½ð±Ò 0.6 ¸ö | ||||
chrinideľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[×ÊÔ´]
ͨÏòÄý¾Û̬ÎïÀíºÍÁ¿×Ó»¯Ñ§µÄÖÕ¼«Ö®Â·--ÃܶȾØÕóÖØÕû»¯Èº£¬´Ó¾ØÕó³Ë»ý̬µ½ÕÅÁ¿ÍøÌ¬
|
|||
|
The key goal of quantum chemistry is the accurate calculation of geometrical and electronical ground state properties of molecules as well of their excited states. To this purpose, density functional theory is by far the most successful and flexible method. However, density functional theory can only be carried out by the use of an exchange-correlation functional which takes into account electronic correlation effects in the molecules. Unfortunately, this functional is only known approximately, and an important topic in quantum chemistry is the calculation of correlation effects in molecules („post-Hartree-Fock¡° calculations). A (so-called) full configuration interaction (CI) calculation is limited to molecules with an extremely small number of orbitals due to the exponential explosion of quantum basis states; hence various approximate schemes to take into account subsets of quantum basis states have been proposed. A similar situation is encountered in the study of strongly correlated quantum systems in condensed matter physics: in the study of lattice models such as the Hubbard or Heisenberg models, which are considered to capture the essentials of low-dimensional quantum magnetism, high-temperature superconductivity and other novel quantum states, the question of identifying relevant subsets of quantum basis states has been at the forefront of research for quite some time. In the case of one-dimensional systems, the so-called density-matrix renormalization group method (DMRG) has emerged as the most powerful method to study correlation effects, both statically and dynamically. From an application point of view, it can be seen as an extension of exact diagonalization methods which are the counterpart of CI in physics. DMRG can therefore be used to extend the reach of CI in quantum chemistry, which has been successfully done by several groups worldwide. However, this is a complicated endeavour: whereas in physics the external one-dimensional lattice provides a natural ordering of sites (or orbitals), this is not the case in quantum chemistry, where the method must be optimized by a clever choice of orbital sets and ordering of orbitals on a pseudo-one-dimensional axis with long-ranged interactions. Nevertheless, impressive accuracies on the level of CI have been achieved. Recently, a thorough reformulation of DMRG in terms of so-called matrix product states (MPS) has shown a profound connection of this method to quantum information theory and revealed that it is only one special method in a much more general set of methods that can give variationally optimal results for much more complicated „lattice¡° arrangements: in physics, these would be quantum states on two- or even three-dimensional lattices (so-called tensor network states), The basic idea of tensor network states is to approximate ground-state wave functions of strongly correlated systems by breaking down the complexity of the high dimensional coefficient tensor of a full configuration-interaction (FCI) wave function and the current hope is that these methods will shed light on some of the big outstanding questions in condensed matter physics. But again, there is a connection to quantum chemistry: these general networks of sites (or orbitals) are not restricted to regular lattices, but can be adapted to the complex arrangements and interactions between quantum chemistry orbitals. In the most naive approach, these arrangements would follow the expected geometrical structure of the molecule under study. However, this can be done more systematically by studying entanglement properties of quantum chemical states, as entanglement turns out to determine the efficiency and accuracy of these methods. Very little is known so far, but it is clear that the current restrictions of DMRG in quantum chemistry would be largely lifted due to the much more flexible setups allowed by tensor network states. [ Last edited by chrinide on 2011-5-7 at 09:26 ] |
» ÊÕ¼±¾ÌûµÄÌÔÌûר¼ÍƼö
uicorn3 |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
±ÈÀûʱ³ãë´óѧÓë¹ú¼ÒÁôѧ»ù½ðί¹²Í¬×ÊÖú²©Ê¿Ñо¿ÉúCSC-KU Leuven PhD Scholarship
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Á¿×ÓµãµçÖ·¢¹âÆ÷¼þ£¨QLED£©£ºÀ¶¹âÁ¿×ӵ㣨QDs£©ºÍÄÉÃ×Ñõ»¯Ð¿µç×Ó´«Êä²ÄÁÏ
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
ÎïÀí»¯Ñ§ÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ135È˻ظ´
ÐèÒªÒ»¸öԲƫÕñ¹âÓÕµ¼»¯Ñ§·´Ó¦£¬ÇëÎÊʹÓÃԲƫÕñ¹â×÷Ϊ¹âÔ´£¬Ó¦¸ÃÐèÒªÄÄЩÉ豸´î½¨
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Â×¶Ø´óѧѧԺBenjamin Moss²©Ê¿ÕÐÊÕÈ˹¤ÖÇÄÜ¡¢Ôλ¹âÆ×¡¢´ß»¯Ïà¹Ø26Ä격ʿÉú
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
Öйú¿ÆÑ§Ôº³É¶¼É½µØÔÖº¦Óë»·¾³Ñо¿Ëù2026ÄêÌØ±ðÑо¿ÖúÀí£¨²©Ê¿ºó£©ÕÐÆ¸ÆôÊÂ
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
ÇóENDNOTEÆÆ½âÈí¼þ°²×°°ü
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ºÓº£´óѧ £¨211.˫һÁ÷¸ßУ£©¸ÆîÑ¿ó¹âµçʵÑéÊÒ¶¡ÓÂÍŶӻ¶ÓÓÐÖ¾ÇàÄ꣡
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
ºÚÁú½Ê¡Ô×ÓÄÜÑо¿Ôº»¯Ñ§¿ÎÌâ×éÕÐÊÕ2026¼¶»¯Ñ§×¨Òµ»ò»¯Ñ§Ïà¹Ø×¨ÒµË¶Ê¿Éú
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
26²©Ê¿ÉêÇë
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
ÕÐÉú²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤¡¢»·¾³¿ÆÑ§µ÷¼ÁÑо¿Éú
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
ÓÃMultiwfn¡¢Gaussview¡¢Molekel¡¢VMD¹Û¿´ÁúϺ¡¢Åè¾°¡¢¹ÇÅè¡¢´óÄÔ
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
ÖÐɽ´óѧÕÐÊÕ»¯Ñ§¡¢ÖÆÒ©¡¢ÉúÎï¡¢²ÄÁϱ³¾°µÄÁªºÏÅàÑøÑо¿Éú
ÒѾÓÐ31È˻ظ´
ÏàÐÅСľ³æ£¬Éó¸åÈËÒ»Òâ¼ûû¿´¶®£¬ÓÖÀ´Çë½ÌÁË¡££¨²ÄÁÏ£¬»¯Ñ§£©
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
°²Òݵĵ绯ѧ¹¤×÷£¬ÎÒµÄǰ;ÔÚÄÄÀï
ÒѾÓÐ148È˻ظ´
±äÏà¡°·ÅÑòÍÞ¡±
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
ÖØ½ðÇóÖúHOMO/LUMOÎÊÌâ
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÈçºÎ¼ÆËã¼üż¼«¾à
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
Çë½ÌÓÃmolpro´òÓ¡Çâ·Ö×ÓÀë×ÓµÄÖØµþ»ý¾ØÕó¡¢µ¥µç×Ó»ý·Ö¾ØÕó¡¢Å¼¼«¾ØÕó
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
¼ÓÈܼÁºó¼ÆË㣬²»ÊÕÁ²£¬Çë¸ßÊÖÖ¸µã
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
¹ØÓÚState-averaged CASSCF
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿ÃܶȾØÕóÖØÕû»¯ÈºËã·¨£¨DMRG)
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
|
ÈçGarnet ChansËù˵£¬http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.1398 µ¥×é̬ΪÖ÷µÄÌåϵDMRGÓ°ÏìÓÐÏÞ 'Conversely, the ansatz is inefficient for describing dynamic correlation, since this benefits from knowledge of the occupied and virtual spaces' [ Last edited by fichte on 2011-5-20 at 18:38 ] |
2Â¥2011-05-06 23:22:19
beefly
ר¼Ò¹ËÎÊ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +458 - QCÇ¿Ìû: 12
- Ó¦Öú: 88 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 13045.7
- Ìû×Ó: 4673
- ÔÚÏß: 927.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 408372
3Â¥2011-05-07 00:24:56
4Â¥2011-05-07 00:28:41
chrinide
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- QCÇ¿Ìû: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 20 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 2460.3
- Ìû×Ó: 431
- ÔÚÏß: 541.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 488931
|
¼¸ºõËùÓеĶàµç×ÓÌåϵ¶¼ÊÇÐèÒª¶à×é̬¶à²Î¿¼À´¾«È·µÄÃèÊö£¬µ¥×é̬½üËÆÔÚijЩʱºòµÄÈ·ºÜÓÐЧ£¬ÕâÈ¡¾öÓÚÎÒÃÇÐèÒªµÃµ½Ìåϵ¶àô¾«È·µÄÎïÀí»¯Ñ§ÐÔÖÊ¡£ ´ÓÁ¿×Ó³¡ÂÛ£¨QFT£©»òÕßÁ¿×Óͳ¼ÆÁ¦Ñ§£¨QSM£©µÄ½Ç¶È³ö·¢£¬¶àµç×ÓÌåϵµÄ¹ØÁªÄÜÆðÔ´ÓÚµçºÉÕÇÂäºÍ´ÅÕÇÂ䣨°üÀ¨×ÔÐýÕÇÂ䡾SFT¡¿ºÍ¹ìµÀÕÇÂ䡾OFT¡¿£©¡£ÀýÈ磬×î½üµÄÑо¿Ö±½Ó±íÃ÷¸ß㬵¼ÌåµÄÄÚÔÚ»úÀíºÍÌåϵµÄÇ¿µÄ×ÔÐýÕÇÂäÃÜÇÐÏà¹Ø£¬¼´±ãÊǾ«È·µÄ¶¯Á¦Ñ§Æ½¾ù³¡£¨DMFT£©Ò²²»ÄܺܺÃ(È·ÇеØËµ¼¸ºõ²»³É¹¦)µÄÃèÊö£¬DMFT°üº¬ÁËʱ¼ä³ß¶ÈµÄ·Ç¾ÖÓòÁ¿×ÓÕÇÂ䣬µ«¶³½áÁ˿ռä³ß¶ÈµÄ·Ç¾ÖÓòÁ¿×ÓÕÇÂ䣳¤³Ì¿âÂØÏ໥×÷Óãµç´ÅÕÇÂä¡£ Òò´Ë£¬¸ß㬵¼µÄÀíÂÛÑо¿·½ÏòÖ®Ò»¾ÍÊÇ DMFT+SFT ¾µäµÄDMRGÀíÂÛÊÇÒ»¸ö»ù̬ÀíÂÛ£¬ÐµĽøÕ¹°üÀ¨ TD-DMRG£¬¶¯Á¦Ñ§DMRG...... Æäʵ¼´±ãÖ»ÊÇ¿¼ÂÇ»ù̬£¬0Σ¬ÎÒÃÇÀëÖÕ¼«Ö®Â·Ò²·Ç³£·Ç³£Ö®Ò£Ô¶¡£ ¿¼ÂÇÓÐÏÞζȣÈÈÕÇÂä£ÌåϵµÄ¼¤·¢Ì¬£µ¥µç×Ӹ߼¤·¢Ì¬£FCI failed£MQDT£¨¶àͨµÀÁ¿×Ó¿÷ËðÀíÂÛ£©£Ë«µç×Ó¼°¶àµç×Ó¼¤·¢Ì¬£µçÀë̬£µÈÀë×ÓÌå......ÕâЩ»ù±¾ÉÏÊôÓÚÎÞÈ˸ÒÅöµÄ¿´ËƼòµ¥µÄʵÔò¾ßÓм«ÆäÉî¿ÌµÄÎïÀíÒâÒåµÄ¼èÄÑ¿ÎÌ⣬ÊýÊ®Äê»ù±¾Ã»Óжà´ó½øÕ¹¡£ ÒýÓÃÒ»¸ö¹ÅÀϵÄÁ¶½ðÊõÊ¿¸ñÑÔ: δ֪±ØÐë½èÓɸüÉîµÄδ֪À´»ñϤ£¬Òþ»Þ±ØÐë½èÓɸüÉîµÄÒþ»ÞÀ´Ã÷ÁË [ Last edited by chrinide on 2011-5-13 at 08:19 ] |
5Â¥2011-05-12 23:05:21
6Â¥2011-05-12 23:08:36
chrinide
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- QCÇ¿Ìû: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 20 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 2460.3
- Ìû×Ó: 431
- ÔÚÏß: 541.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 488931
|
HeÔ×ÓµÄË«µç×Ó¼¤·¢Ì¬£¬ÕâÊÇ×î¼òµ¥×îÖ±½ÓµÄÀý×Ó¡£ ÆäËü¾ÍÌ«¶àÁËÁË£¬Äã¿ÉÒԲο¼Ò»ÏÂMCQD£¨¶àͨµÀÁ¿×Ó¿÷ËðÀíÂÛ£©ÒýÈëºÍ½¨Á¢µÄ±³¾°ºÍ¹ý³Ì¡£ ¼òµ¥µÄ˵£ºË«µç×Ó¼¤·¢Ê±£¬½ü¶ÀÁ¢µç×ÓÄ£ÐÍÖеĵ¥µç×Ó¹ìµÀ½Ç¶¯Á¿ÒѲ»ÊǺõÄÁ¿×ÓÊý£¬×é̬֮¼äµÄ¸ÉÉæ½«Óú·¢Ã÷ÏÔ£¬ÕæÕýµÄÔ×Ó̬ÒѲ»ÄÜÓÉÔÀ´µÄµ¥µç×Ó×é̬À´ÃèÊö£¬´Ëʱ¾ÍÐèÒªÒýÈ볬Çò×ø±êÀ´ÃèÊöÁË¡£ [ Last edited by chrinide on 2011-5-13 at 08:20 ] |
7Â¥2011-05-13 08:15:48
8Â¥2011-05-13 08:19:41
chrinide
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- QCÇ¿Ìû: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 20 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 2460.3
- Ìû×Ó: 431
- ÔÚÏß: 541.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 488931
9Â¥2011-05-13 08:27:03
10Â¥2011-05-13 08:44:28
chrinide
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- QCÇ¿Ìû: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 20 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 2460.3
- Ìû×Ó: 431
- ÔÚÏß: 541.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 488931
11Â¥2011-05-13 09:03:40
12Â¥2011-05-13 09:41:22
beefly
ר¼Ò¹ËÎÊ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +458 - QCÇ¿Ìû: 12
- Ó¦Öú: 88 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 13045.7
- Ìû×Ó: 4673
- ÔÚÏß: 927.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 408372
|
·¢ÏÖ×îа汾µÄACES II 2.8ÒѾ¼ÓÉÏÁËDMRG£¬²»¹ý¼ÈûÓÐʹÓÃ˵Ã÷£¬Ò²Ã»ÓÐËãÀý£¬Ö»ÓÐÒ»¶Ñ´úÂë http://www.qtp.ufl.edu/ACES/ ³ÌÐòµÄ²Î¿¼ÎÄÏ×£ºJCP 128, 144116, 2008 |
13Â¥2011-05-13 11:17:32
14Â¥2011-05-13 16:15:34
chrinide
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- QCÇ¿Ìû: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 20 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 2460.3
- Ìû×Ó: 431
- ÔÚÏß: 541.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 488931
15Â¥2011-05-13 22:04:36
16Â¥2011-05-13 22:37:15
chrinide
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- QCÇ¿Ìû: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 20 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 2460.3
- Ìû×Ó: 431
- ÔÚÏß: 541.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 488931
17Â¥2011-05-13 22:47:43
18Â¥2011-05-13 22:49:07
chrinide
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- QCÇ¿Ìû: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 20 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 2460.3
- Ìû×Ó: 431
- ÔÚÏß: 541.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 488931
19Â¥2011-05-13 22:52:10
20Â¥2012-10-31 22:03:38














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥




...
£©£¬ÓÐʱºòÕùÂÛºÜÓбØÒª--Ëùν ÕæÀíÔ½±çÔ½Ã÷ Ó¦¸ÃÊǸöÕâ¸öµÀÀí°É£¬¹þ¹þ