24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 967  |  回复: 5

yarmiay

木虫 (著名写手)

[求助] 在线投稿过程中一个问题的回答

投稿过程中,出现这样一个问题:“Has this article or an earlier version of this article been considered previously by Comput. Theor. Chem. or by THEOCHEM or any other journal? Yes/No. If your response is 'Yes', please provide details in the cover letter.”

我第一次这样回答的:This article is not being considered for publication by any other journal.
编辑回信:“to the question: "Has this article or an earlier version of this article been considered previously by Comput. Theor. Chem. or by THEOCHEM or any other journal?" your answer was "NO", Is it correct?”

我第二次进入投稿系统选择了No,
编辑又回信::“You did not answer to the question: "Has this article or an earlier version of this article been considered previously by Comput. Theor. Chem. or by THEOCHEM or any other journal?" your answer was "NO", Is it correct?”Please DO


我该怎么做!!求助啦大家
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

努力向风一样前进
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

木子8268

木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

yarmiay(金币+4): 谢谢,因为之前没遇到过这类问题 2011-05-02 23:31:33
我第一次这样回答的:This article is not being considered for publication by any other journal.
编辑回信:“to the question: "Has this article or an earlier version of this article been considered previously by Comput. Theor. Chem. or by THEOCHEM or any other journal?" your answer was "NO", Is it correct?”

然后你直接回复编辑,yes就ok了吧
为啥他让你确定一下,你就改变自己的选择了呢?
之前没投过就是no,否则选yes你详细阐明之前投稿的问题
2楼2011-05-01 11:09:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家

【答案】应助回帖


sunke(金币+1): 劳动节,鼓励虫子回帖交流 2011-05-01 15:54:05
yarmiay(金币+4): 谢谢,我再试试 2011-05-02 23:33:34
"Is it correct?" 你不能回答No,要回答Yes,it is correct。。。
3楼2011-05-01 11:18:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jiann_li84

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

yarmiay(金币+3): 是回复邮件吗?还是在投稿系统回答 2011-05-03 09:08:06
直接回复YES不就可以了?
4楼2011-05-01 17:49:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wellyy2005

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

s

【答案】应助回帖

yarmiay(金币+4): 是在邮件还是投稿系统中回答啊 2011-05-03 09:08:48
Yes, this article or an earlier version of this article has not been  considered previously by Comput. Theor. Chem. or by THEOCHEM or any other journal.
5楼2011-05-01 18:14:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xyyl

木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

yarmiay(金币+5): 谢谢问题已解决 2011-05-18 12:28:09
编辑让你回答的是他的提问:You did not answer to the question: "Has this article or an earlier version of this article been considered previously by Comput. Theor. Chem. or by THEOCHEM or any other journal?" your answer was "NO", Is it correct?而不是ou did not answer to the question: "Has this article or an earlier version of this article been considered previously by Comput. Theor. Chem. or by THEOCHEM or any other journal?" 。你应该回答yes,this article or an earlier version of this article has not been  considered previously by Comput. Theor. Chem. or by THEOCHEM or any other journal.
6楼2011-05-05 10:29:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 yarmiay 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见