| 查看: 434 | 回复: 0 | ||
[求助]
求助 句子解释分析
|
|
Sample Text The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, ratified in 1868, prohibits state governments from denying citizens the “equal protection of the laws.” Although precisely what the framers of the amendment meant by this equal protection clause remains unclear, all interpreters agree that the framers’ immediate objective was to provide a constitutional warrant for the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which guaranteed the citizenship of all persons born in the United States and subject to United States jurisdiction. This declaration, which was echoed in the text of the Fourteenth Amendment, was designed primarily to counter the Supreme Court’s ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford that Black people in the United States could be denied citizenship. The act was vetoed by President Andrew Johnson, who argued that the Thirteenth Amendment, which abolished slavery, did not provide Congress with the authority to extend citizenship and equal protection to the freed slaves. Although Congress promptly overrode Johnson’s veto, supporters of the act sought to ensure its constitutional foundations with the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment. The broad language of the amendment strongly suggests that its framers were proposing to write into the Constitution not a laundry list of specific civil rights but a principle of equal citizenship that forbids organized society from treating any individual as a member of an inferior class. Yet for the first eight decades of the amendment’s existence, the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the amendment betrayed this ideal of equality. In the Civil Rights Cases of 1883, for example, the Court invented the “state action” limitation, which asserts that “private” decisions by owners of public accommodations and other commercial businesses to segregate their facilities are insulated from the reach of the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection under the law. After the Second World War, a judicial climate more hospitable to equal protection claims culminated in the Supreme Court’s ruling in Brown v. Board of Education that racially segregated schools violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Two doctrines embraced by the Supreme Court during this period extended the amendment’s reach. First, the Court required especially strict scrutiny of legislation that employed a “suspect classification,” meaning discrimination against a group on grounds that could be construed as racial. This doctrine has broadened the application of the Fourteenth Amendment to other, nonracial forms of discrimination, for while some justices have refused to find any legislative classification other than race to be constitutionally disfavored, most have been receptive to arguments that at least some nonracial discriminations, sexual discrimination in particular, are “suspect” and deserve this heightened scrutiny by the courts. Second, the Court relaxed the state action limitation on the Fourteenth Amendment, bringing new forms of private conduct within the amendment’s reach. 求下划线上句子的解释分析，（1）supporters of the act.....中 ，act 指哪个， （2）第二个句子的翻译 （3）句子分析，are “suspect”连接的是哪个句子 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
AI 太可怕了，写基金时，提出想法，直接生成的文字比自己想得深远，还有科学性
已经有6人回复
-
有院领导为了换新车，用横向课题经费买了俩车
已经有9人回复
-
酰胺脱乙酰基
已经有13人回复
-
博士延得我，科研能力直往上蹿
已经有8人回复
-
同年申请2项不同项目，第1个项目里不写第2个项目的信息，可以吗
已经有4人回复
-
有时候真觉得大城市人没有县城人甚至个体户幸福
已经有10人回复
-
天津大学招2026.09的博士生，欢迎大家推荐交流（博导是本人）
已经有5人回复
-
遇见不省心的家人很难过
已经有22人回复