24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (4276)
>导师招生 (455)
>硕博家园 (268)
>虫友互识 (261)
>文献求助 (193)
>考博 (129)
>招聘信息布告栏 (107)
>博后之家 (51)
>休闲灌水 (38)
>基金申请 (30)
>论文投稿 (30)
>有机交流 (28)
>考研 (25)
>公派出国 (23)
>教师之家 (18)
>找工作 (17)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

pheres8

木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 3 (幼儿园)
金币: 1892.6
帖子: 1980
在线: 969.6小时
虫号: 580197

[交流] 艾斯维尔投稿 sent back to author，请各位指点。

编辑审查都没通过，回复如下：
Your submission entitled "xxxxxx" has been received by The Journal of Supercritical fluids.

However, before I can proceed with the review process, there are some important points that need your immediate attention:

(1) The work fails aspects of our quality control.  Authors will need to provide completely and entirely original sentences and sentence structures before evaluation is possible.  Please refer to ethical guidelines and confirm that all co-authors have read and understood submission requirements.

(2) The English needs substantial revision with respect to general usage and use of the technical literature.  There are also problems with the citation style in the text.  Please see the Author Information Pack online and follow the guidelines precisely

(3) Figure and table captions need to be better thought out.  Figures and tables need to be understandable without referring to the text in detail.  The number of figures and tables seems to be excessive.  I would strongly recommend the authors to rethink parts of the presentation before formal submission.

(4) The work seems to lack comprehensiveness with respect to comparisons with the literature in the figures and tables..

(5) Reproducibility in the work needs to be demonstrated.

初次投稿，该如何修改，希望有经验的大侠逐条指点！！！

[ Last edited by pheres8 on 2011-4-8 at 23:41 ]

回复此楼

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2011-04-08 21:50:54

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

luyehu198611

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 12 (小学生)
金币: 6043.5
帖子: 796
在线: 151.9小时
虫号: 1170526

★
pheres8(金币+1):谢谢参与
pheres8(金币+5): 2011-04-11 08:01:15

引用回帖:

Originally posted by julianlijian at 2011-04-08 23:50:57:
第一条，确认所有作者都阅读过你的稿件；
第二条，改英文表达，修改引用格式；
第三条，对图重新组织，图太多了，不够精；
第四条，好像是说缺乏比较吧；
第五条，给出你实验的可重复性的证据

说的不错，可能你的格式问题很大，好好看看guideline 佛如authors，给你重修再投不错啦，有的期刊就直接reject
另外，楼主，记住第一句话，你的论文内容好像与期刊不符合哦