| 查看: 530 | 回复: 1 | |||
[交流]
【求助】算AIM时有如此信息严重么？Significant integration error for the following
|
|
AIM的sum文件里常常会见到这样的信息：Significant integration error for the following atom 查了下aimall软件的网站，针对这一信息，上面是这么说的： Ideally, calculated atomic L(A) values should be zero and the sum of any calculated atomic property over all atoms in a molecule should of course equal the known molecular value. In practice, there will always be some numerical integration errors, usually related to the complexity of atomic surfaces. A "Warning! Significant ... integration error ..." message will be written to the sum file if any of the following occurs: The magnitude of atom A's calculated L(A) value is > 0.01 au. The magnitude of the sum of all calculated L(A) values is > 0.01 au. The magnitude of the difference between the actual molecular charge and the sum of all calculated atomic charges q(A) is > 0.01 au. A "Note. Potentially significant ... integration error ..." message will be written to the sum file if any of the following occurs: The magnitude of atom A's calculated L(A) value is > 0.002 au and < 0.01 au. The magnitude of the sum of all calculated L(A) values is > 0.002 au and < 0.01 au. The magnitude of the difference between the actual molecular charge and the sum of all calculated atomic charges q(A) is > 0.002 au and < 0.01 au. The threshold values of 0.01 au for "Significant" and 0.002 au for "Potentially significant" integration errors are reasonable, but may be too conservative or not conservative enough depending on one's purposes. Note that it is possible (but not likely) that a calculated atomic L(A) value can be fortuituously small in magnitude due to a cancellation of errors. Users are always advised to monitor themselves the sums of calculated atomic properties as well as the individual calculated L(A) values, and be prepared to recalculate "problem atoms" using higher quadrature and / or a different atomic integration algorithm. The README file gives a few examples of recalculating "problem atoms". 大概就是L（A）的值出了问题，因为本虫子还没有弄懂AIM理论，所以不知道这个值出了问题后，对其他性质，如电子密度，电子密度的拉普拉斯量等是否有很大的影响，请高手指点一二，有币币表谢意！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
请问哪里可以代烧带压力的炉子？
已经有6人回复
-
关于合成MIL-125的求助
已经有0人回复
-
物理化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有220人回复
-
双非本硕光催化方向想读博，请各位老师看看我！
已经有2人回复
-
瑞典林雪平大学范立洲课题组现招聘博士后、岗位制博士生
已经有0人回复
-
中国科大仿生界面材料科学全国重点实验室戴懿涛研究员/江雷院士团队招聘科研助理
已经有0人回复
-
中国科大仿生界面材料科学全国重点实验室戴懿涛研究员/江雷院士团队招聘科研助理
已经有0人回复
-
寻求物理化学学报最新的投稿模板！
已经有4人回复
-
投稿咨询
已经有7人回复
-
自科面上 散金币 祈福
已经有61人回复
-
求问：LATP煅烧应该使用什么容器？
已经有0人回复
2楼2011-03-28 10:09:12
