24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

wdl23

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 192.8
帖子: 55
在线: 31.2小时
虫号: 865594

[交流] Applied Surface Science让修改,接受的可能大吗?

第一次投Applied Surface Science，收到审稿意见，让修改,修改意见如下：

Dear …………

Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision.

For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below.

If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript.

To submit a revision, please go to http://ees.elsevier.com/apsusc/ and login as an Author.
Your username is:

If you need to retrieve password details, please go to:
http://ees.elsevier.com/apsusc/automail_query.asp

On your Main Menu page is a folder entitled "Submissions Needing Revision". You will find your submission record there.

Yours sincerely,

Henrik Rudolph
Editor
Applied Surface Science

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: In general, the paper entitled "Defects in the in-situ synthesized TiB2/Fe composite coatings during PTA process"by Wu Daoliang, Wang Xibao, Zhang Panpan, Cai Lijuan, Sun Hongling is interesting for the reader. However,paper in the present form is not recommended for publication?
1. The English language used is not up to the mark because some sentences are confusing and there are many mistakes. Also, some parts should be better discussed and some experimental details presented. The discussion section must be extended providing explanations of some results. A significant revision of the language is called for. Authors are requested to seek some external help in this regard.
2. The unit of heat input formulation are errors. For heat input, which parameters is a key factor to form defect.
3. What is the macro defect?
4. In the part of results and discussion, there are some confusions of the influence of the total heat input and energy density on the defect.
5. Are there any CO2 porosity or Fe3C in the coatings?

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

一篇文章投到applied surface science，3天就被主编给拒了！还能再次投到这个期刊吗？已经有14人回复
applied surface science 杂志怎么选编辑已经有6人回复
Applied Surface Science修改稿多久应该发过去已经有6人回复
Applied Surface Science 审稿已经有12人回复
Applied Surface Science 已经有20人回复
applied surface science 主编 Frans Habraken教授去世，投过这个杂志的朋友们，让我? 已经有23人回复
有投过applied surface science的朋友吗，咨询个问题已经有17人回复
求助applied surface science的投稿细节已经有6人回复
Applied Surface Science 已经有28人回复
Applied surface science 已经有11人回复
Applied surface science分配主编的问题已经有16人回复
Applied surface science 投稿具体细节问题已经有12人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2011-03-21 21:17:52

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

wdl23

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 192.8
帖子: 55
在线: 31.2小时
虫号: 865594

引用回帖:

Originally posted by beijingbit at 2011-03-28 14:28:57:
麻烦问下各位虫友，applied surface science 投稿后几天给分配编辑啊？我投稿两周了，状态还是with editor。联系人邮箱是我导师，我导师不懂英文。投稿几天会发信给联系人，告之编辑是哪位啊？

要看是哪位编辑了，有的编辑快，有的编辑慢，我大概两三天之后就under review了