应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » Applied Surface Science让修改,接受的可能大吗?
南方科技大学公共卫生及应急管理学院2025级博士研究生招生报考通知
51/1返回列表
查看: 2880  |  回复: 18
只看楼主@他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

wdl23

新虫 (小有名气)

[交流] Applied Surface Science让修改,接受的可能大吗?

第一次投Applied Surface Science，收到审稿意见，让修改,修改意见如下：

Dear …………

Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision.  

For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below.

If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript.

To submit a revision, please go to http://ees.elsevier.com/apsusc/ and login as an Author.
Your username is:

If you need to retrieve password details, please go to:
http://ees.elsevier.com/apsusc/automail_query.asp

On your Main Menu page is a folder entitled "Submissions Needing Revision". You will find your submission record there.

Yours sincerely,

Henrik Rudolph
Editor
Applied Surface Science

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: In general, the paper entitled "Defects in the in-situ synthesized TiB2/Fe composite coatings during PTA process"by Wu Daoliang, Wang Xibao, Zhang Panpan, Cai Lijuan, Sun Hongling is interesting for the reader. However,paper in the present form is not recommended for publication?
1. The English language used is not up to the mark because some sentences are confusing and there are many mistakes. Also, some parts should be better discussed and some experimental details presented. The discussion section must be extended providing explanations of some results. A significant revision of the language is called for. Authors are requested to seek some external help in this regard.
2. The unit of heat input formulation are errors. For heat input, which parameters is a key factor to form defect.
3. What is the macro defect?
4. In the part of results and discussion, there are some confusions of the influence of the total heat input and energy density on the defect.
5. Are there any CO2 porosity or Fe3C in the coatings?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴
1楼2011-03-21 21:17:52
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yaoyao145

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)
wdl23(金币+1): 2011-03-24 21:03:05
major revise还是多放放   一个月后投回去
赞一下 回复此楼
15楼2011-03-24 07:51:55
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 19 个回答

ally5829

木虫 (著名写手)
按照审稿人的意见修改问题不大。
赞一下 回复此楼
2楼2011-03-21 21:57:16
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

南理工化院

铜虫 (正式写手)
很奇怪 这个杂志现在至少要求两个审稿人了 楼主的文章审了多长时间 我也有一篇在审
赞一下 回复此楼
4楼2011-03-22 16:59:18
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yaoyao145

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)
可以登录系统查看 是大修还是小修 如果是大修 就要加倍仔细的修改  小修的话也要认真。。。。  只要按照审稿人的意见改 问题不大
赞一下 回复此楼
5楼2011-03-22 17:04:37
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 19 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭