24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (4688)
>文献求助 (345)
>导师招生 (343)
>休闲灌水 (221)
>论文投稿 (200)
>虫友互识 (139)
>博后之家 (126)
>考博 (118)
>学术会议 (104)
>教师之家 (52)
>找工作 (48)
>硕博家园 (44)
>公派出国 (42)
>招聘信息布告栏 (41)
>绿色求助(高悬赏) (37)
>考研 (35)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

wdl23

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 192.8
帖子: 55
在线: 31.2小时
虫号: 865594

[交流] Applied Surface Science让修改,接受的可能大吗?

第一次投Applied Surface Science，收到审稿意见，让修改,修改意见如下：

Dear …………

Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision.

For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below.

If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript.

To submit a revision, please go to http://ees.elsevier.com/apsusc/ and login as an Author.
Your username is:

If you need to retrieve password details, please go to:
http://ees.elsevier.com/apsusc/automail_query.asp

On your Main Menu page is a folder entitled "Submissions Needing Revision". You will find your submission record there.

Yours sincerely,

Henrik Rudolph
Editor
Applied Surface Science

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: In general, the paper entitled "Defects in the in-situ synthesized TiB2/Fe composite coatings during PTA process"by Wu Daoliang, Wang Xibao, Zhang Panpan, Cai Lijuan, Sun Hongling is interesting for the reader. However,paper in the present form is not recommended for publication?
1. The English language used is not up to the mark because some sentences are confusing and there are many mistakes. Also, some parts should be better discussed and some experimental details presented. The discussion section must be extended providing explanations of some results. A significant revision of the language is called for. Authors are requested to seek some external help in this regard.
2. The unit of heat input formulation are errors. For heat input, which parameters is a key factor to form defect.
3. What is the macro defect?
4. In the part of results and discussion, there are some confusions of the influence of the total heat input and energy density on the defect.
5. Are there any CO2 porosity or Fe3C in the coatings?

回复此楼