| 查看: 235 | 回复: 0 | |||
[交流]
菜鸟求教
|
|
我是个菜鸟，刚又一篇英文文章，修改意见如下： The authors spend some lines talking about the characterization of the new catalyst, and then the presentation of the results of Cr (VI) reduction is fast and not clear. No replications are given and then, any statistical validation of what is presented in this point is useless for the reader. Anyway, the reduction of Cr (VI) is not a novel topic and there is abundant literature on this using a lot of technologies: classical adsorption, nanoparticles conversion, chemical precipitation, etc. 尤其是哪个No replications are given and then, any statistical validation of what is presented in this point is useless for the reader我搞不清楚是什么意思 多谢了各位牛人 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有5人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有7人回复
