| 查看: 361 | 回复: 0 | |||
colinmacrean新虫 (初入文坛)
|
[交流]
麻烦大家帮忙分析一下这个审稿意见
|
|
审稿人1： The experimental setup is well described and the results are useful. After the description of the experimental results there is an attempt to model the experiment in a CFD simulation. This description is incomplete and superfluous and should therefore be erased. The authors do not mention anything about the difficulties of these numerical models, their convergence, the nature and effect of the turbulence model, etc. There is extensive literature on the modeling of these types of reactive flows which should be included in a separate paper. 审稿人2： The experimental approach is original and convenient. The numerical parts completes this study usefully but is may be a bit too short. Has a grid test be done? Boundary conditions could be given in a more clearly way for example in a table as it has been done for the governing equations. 如果按照审稿人1去掉数值计算部分是否可行？但是如果按照审稿人2修改似乎可能不会满足审稿人1的要求。 还望大家多指教！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
重要消息，中午系统在维护
已经有7人回复
-
两姐妹，一个辛辛苦苦30岁工作当大学教师，另一个23岁就工作当开车教练
已经有5人回复
-
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有102人回复
-
时间戳又变了8-15
已经有26人回复
-
今天维护系统维护 祝所有人 高中
已经有9人回复
-
哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜？
已经有16人回复
-
2027广东省杰青
已经有8人回复
-
快农历七夕节了，轻松一下，男人悄悄话，女施主请不要进来。
已经有5人回复
-
投稿咨询
已经有5人回复
-
时间戳变了，能看出什么问题？
已经有6人回复
