| 查看: 317 | 回复: 0 | |||
colinmacrean新虫 (初入文坛)
|
[交流]
麻烦大家帮忙分析一下这个审稿意见
|
|
审稿人1： The experimental setup is well described and the results are useful. After the description of the experimental results there is an attempt to model the experiment in a CFD simulation. This description is incomplete and superfluous and should therefore be erased. The authors do not mention anything about the difficulties of these numerical models, their convergence, the nature and effect of the turbulence model, etc. There is extensive literature on the modeling of these types of reactive flows which should be included in a separate paper. 审稿人2： The experimental approach is original and convenient. The numerical parts completes this study usefully but is may be a bit too short. Has a grid test be done? Boundary conditions could be given in a more clearly way for example in a table as it has been done for the governing equations. 如果按照审稿人1去掉数值计算部分是否可行？但是如果按照审稿人2修改似乎可能不会满足审稿人1的要求。 还望大家多指教！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
参与限项
已经有3人回复
-
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求
已经有7人回复
-
实验室接单子
已经有4人回复
-
全日制（定向）博士
已经有4人回复
-
对氯苯硼酸纯化
已经有3人回复
-
求助:我三月中下旬出站，青基依托单位怎么办？
已经有12人回复
-
不自信的我
已经有12人回复
-
所感
已经有4人回复
-
要不要辞职读博？
已经有7人回复
-
北核录用
已经有3人回复