| 查看: 325 | 回复: 0 | |||
colinmacrean新虫 (初入文坛)
|
[交流]
麻烦大家帮忙分析一下这个审稿意见
|
|
审稿人1： The experimental setup is well described and the results are useful. After the description of the experimental results there is an attempt to model the experiment in a CFD simulation. This description is incomplete and superfluous and should therefore be erased. The authors do not mention anything about the difficulties of these numerical models, their convergence, the nature and effect of the turbulence model, etc. There is extensive literature on the modeling of these types of reactive flows which should be included in a separate paper. 审稿人2： The experimental approach is original and convenient. The numerical parts completes this study usefully but is may be a bit too short. Has a grid test be done? Boundary conditions could be given in a more clearly way for example in a table as it has been done for the governing equations. 如果按照审稿人1去掉数值计算部分是否可行？但是如果按照审稿人2修改似乎可能不会满足审稿人1的要求。 还望大家多指教！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
280求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
网上报道青年教师午睡中猝死、熬夜猝死的越来越多，主要哪些原因引起的？
已经有8人回复
-
面上可以超过30页吧？
已经有11人回复
-
版面费该交吗
已经有15人回复
-
体制内长辈说体制内绝大部分一辈子在底层，如同你们一样大部分普通教师忙且收入低
已经有18人回复
-
为什么中国大学工科教授们水了那么多所谓的顶会顶刊，但还是做不出宇树机器人？
已经有10人回复
-
什么是人一生最重要的？
已经有4人回复