24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

colinmacrean

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 39
帖子: 26
在线: 16.3小时
虫号: 1121848
注册: 2010-10-13
专业: 可再生与替代能源利用中的

[交流] 麻烦大家帮忙分析一下这个审稿意见

审稿人1：
The experimental setup is well described and the results are useful. After the description of the experimental results there is an attempt to model the experiment in a CFD simulation. This description is incomplete and superfluous and should therefore be erased. The authors do not mention anything about the difficulties of these numerical models, their convergence, the nature and effect of the turbulence model, etc. There is extensive literature on the modeling of these types of reactive flows which should be included in a separate paper.

审稿人2：
The experimental approach is original and convenient. The numerical parts completes this study usefully but is may be a bit too short. Has a grid test be done? Boundary conditions could be given in a more clearly way for example in a table as it has been done for the governing equations.

如果按照审稿人1去掉数值计算部分是否可行？但是如果按照审稿人2修改似乎可能不会满足审稿人1的要求。

还望大家多指教！

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

1楼 2011-03-06 21:46:33

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

相关版块跳转我要订阅楼主 colinmacrean 的主题更新

返回列表