| 查看: 337 | 回复: 0 | |||
colinmacrean新虫 (初入文坛)
|
[交流]
麻烦大家帮忙分析一下这个审稿意见
|
|
审稿人1： The experimental setup is well described and the results are useful. After the description of the experimental results there is an attempt to model the experiment in a CFD simulation. This description is incomplete and superfluous and should therefore be erased. The authors do not mention anything about the difficulties of these numerical models, their convergence, the nature and effect of the turbulence model, etc. There is extensive literature on the modeling of these types of reactive flows which should be included in a separate paper. 审稿人2： The experimental approach is original and convenient. The numerical parts completes this study usefully but is may be a bit too short. Has a grid test be done? Boundary conditions could be given in a more clearly way for example in a table as it has been done for the governing equations. 如果按照审稿人1去掉数值计算部分是否可行？但是如果按照审稿人2修改似乎可能不会满足审稿人1的要求。 还望大家多指教！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
评审感受-评审感受-评审感受
已经有6人回复
-
现在不知道怎么办，感觉很痛苦
已经有5人回复
-
导师各种操作恶心咋办
已经有9人回复
-
生物学博士
已经有6人回复
-
窗边初夏的小雨
已经有8人回复
-
护理论文 晋升
已经有3人回复
-
2026年申博-电池方向
已经有11人回复
-
26年申博自荐-计算机视觉
已经有4人回复
-
2026博士申请求助
已经有5人回复
-
研究生做的很差，你们会让毕业吗？
已经有11人回复