| 查看: 375 | 回复: 0 | |||
colinmacrean新虫 (初入文坛)
|
[交流]
麻烦大家帮忙分析一下这个审稿意见
|
|
审稿人1： The experimental setup is well described and the results are useful. After the description of the experimental results there is an attempt to model the experiment in a CFD simulation. This description is incomplete and superfluous and should therefore be erased. The authors do not mention anything about the difficulties of these numerical models, their convergence, the nature and effect of the turbulence model, etc. There is extensive literature on the modeling of these types of reactive flows which should be included in a separate paper. 审稿人2： The experimental approach is original and convenient. The numerical parts completes this study usefully but is may be a bit too short. Has a grid test be done? Boundary conditions could be given in a more clearly way for example in a table as it has been done for the governing equations. 如果按照审稿人1去掉数值计算部分是否可行？但是如果按照审稿人2修改似乎可能不会满足审稿人1的要求。 还望大家多指教！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
面上有专家说实验设备不是我们单位的
已经有6人回复
-
博士去二本高校当辅导员，如何调整心态？
已经有8人回复
-
27细胞生物学申博
已经有5人回复
-
江苏省自然基金 什么时候出结果
已经有6人回复
-
广西大学-广州大学招聘博士后 欢迎广大优秀人才！！！
已经有11人回复
-
闲聊
已经有3人回复
-
如何查询2026年获批项目名称？
已经有3人回复
-
两块石头
已经有10人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有15人回复
-
面上没中，邀请各位路过的虫友分析一下分数
已经有13人回复