| 查看: 2036 | 回复: 11 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
2004500730铜虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
求助——此份评审意见如何解读？？ 已有9人参与
|
||
|
投稿《Mechanism and Machine Theory》，编辑转发了审稿人的意见，但标红线处看不明白，究竟是只把其建议的文献加在综述里，还是文章的研究内容要扩展？请指教。 Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: This reviewer congratulates the authors for the newest effort in the kinematic analysis of complex planar linkages. The idea was based on BKC (basic kinematic chain) developed by Prof. T. L. Yang and his associates. It offers a method for BKC type identification and then a numerical method for the kinematic analysis. They are capable of treating up to 12 links. They are able to find all possible BKC configurations. The following references are suggested, which address the issue of complex linkage configuration "recognition", i.e. motion continuity and smoothness among possible configurations. Ting, K. L., C. Xue, J. Wang, K. Currie, "Full Rotatability and Singularity of Six-Bar and Geared Five-Bar Linkages," Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics 2, no. 1, pp. 011011-1~9, March 2010 J. Wang, Ting, K. L., C. Xue, "Discriminant method for the mobility identification of Single Degree-of-freedom double-loop Linkages," Mechanism and Machine Theory, Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages 740-755, May 2010 Wang, J. and Ting, K. L. Mobility Identification of a Group of Single Degree-of-freedom Eight-bar Linkages, Proceedings of the ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference,DETC2010-28961 Publication is recommended. Reviewer #2: This paper presents a general method for the kinematic configuration analysis to planar closed kinematic chains with R-pairs. This is an interesting topic and examples show that this method is simple, efficient and reliable. So the reviewer tend to recommond the paper be accepted by the journal after a good proofread of the whole manuscrip. [ Last edited by 2004500730 on 2011-2-21 at 15:13 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
垃圾破二本职称评审标准
已经有18人回复
-
职称评审没过，求安慰
已经有53人回复
-
毕业后当辅导员了，天天各种学生超烦
已经有5人回复
-
26申博自荐
已经有3人回复
-
A期刊撤稿
已经有4人回复
-
EST投稿状态问题
已经有7人回复
yydggpzh
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 3 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 5846.4
- 散金: 65
- 红花: 9
- 帖子: 1027
- 在线: 352.9小时
- 虫号: 483703
- 注册: 2007-12-26
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 催化化学
12楼2011-07-14 18:07:49
2楼2011-02-21 15:18:02
2004500730
铜虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 55.4
- 散金: 30
- 帖子: 94
- 在线: 54.3小时
- 虫号: 719937
- 注册: 2009-03-11
- 专业: 机构学与机器人
4楼2011-02-21 15:24:07
yijie
木虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 5737.8
- 散金: 2895
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 213
- 在线: 502.4小时
- 虫号: 30021
- 注册: 2003-11-28
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 环境工程
5楼2011-02-21 15:53:58