24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (4596)
>基金申请 (542)
>文献求助 (335)
>虫友互识 (326)
>休闲灌水 (244)
>导师招生 (227)
>硕博家园 (204)
>论文投稿 (144)
>考研 (116)
>考博 (107)
>公派出国 (83)
>论文道贺祈福 (79)
>教师之家 (75)
>招聘信息布告栏 (70)
>博后之家 (69)
>SciFinder/Reaxys (38)

返回列表

zhaishuang

金虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1406.9
帖子: 144
在线: 241小时
虫号: 542547

[交流] 大家看看我接下来这篇论文该如何处理？

编辑来信是：
Dear Dr. **,

I'm afraid I must reject your submission for publication in Journal of Power Sources.

For your guidance, please find attached the reviewers' comments.

IF you decide to resubmit there must be SUBSTANTIAL changes made or the paper will be rejected immediately.  If you resubmit:

1) You MUST make clear that if it is a resubmission of this paper in the covering letter and ALSO enter "This is a resubmission of paper #_____ " (add the rejected paper number) in the author's "ENTER COMMENTS" box when submitting.  Each of the current reviewer criticisms must be answered in an accompanying letter (listing each reviewer comment and your answer and your correction) and,
2) Changes made in response to the reviewers must be identified in the new text by highlighting with colour or by underlining.

审稿意见主要是：
1. Hence, the manuscript has an interesting topic suitable for publishing in the JPS.
  2. However, there is a critical error in the model derivation.
  3. The reviewer would like to encourage the authors to .....

各位前辈看看我是修改后继续投呢（接收概率大吗？），还是根据审稿意见投别的期刊？谢谢！

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

亲们，大家看看这个图如何做？已经有6人回复
大家看看这篇文章的晶体数据是不是解错了？？？已经有9人回复
大家帮忙看看应该怎么办？已经有7人回复
大家帮忙看看这种情况应该如何处理！已经有5人回复
大家看看，我该如何投稿到哪个期刊？《从金庸的武学视角谈计算机编程思维的培养》已经有10人回复
大家帮忙看看我这情况应该怎么办？已经有3人回复
麻烦大家帮我看看这个拒稿意见怎么修改和改投，谢谢！已经有3人回复
怎么处理这篇论文呢？已经有7人回复
这个据稿理由，大家看看我该怎么办？已经有26人回复
SCI论文从入门到精通（第一版）已经有93人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2011-02-16 12:56:36

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

xjajx

至尊木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
贵宾: 1.796
金币: 10465.4
帖子: 1967
在线: 495.2小时
虫号: 1134415

zhaishuang(金币+2): 谢谢您的宝贵建议！ 2011-02-16 15:14:40

引用回帖:

Originally posted by zhaishuang at 2011-02-16 12:56:36:
编辑来信是：
Dear Dr. **,

I'm afraid I must reject your submission for publication in Journal of Power Sources.

For your guidance, please find attached the reviewers' comments.

IF you de ...

审稿意见主要是：
1. Hence, the manuscript has an interesting topic suitable for publishing in the JPS.
2. However, there is a critical error in the model derivation.
3. The reviewer would like to encourage the authors to .....

n你的文章类似大修，很多杂志这样搞，不让大修让重投，这样可以增加他杂志的出版速度，我建议你按要求好好改改再投，感觉你这个应该差不多，尤其是提到的那几点，要在文章中突出你的修改