24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 2728  |  回复: 9
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

melodyxin

铜虫 (小有名气)

[交流] World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology审稿意见回来了已有5人参与

两个审稿人,一个提了三个大修意见,三个小修意见;另一个则提了20条很细的意见。主编的意思,是要求我根据审稿人意见进行大修,而且提醒我只有一次修改机会。

认真看了下,大修意见的其中一条是觉得我的研究目的不够明确,而且部分数据结果由于不是理想中的数据,反而会影响文章的新意。举个例子:(我是做产纤维素酶基因工程菌构建的,通过将一个异源的内切酶基因转入丝状真菌来使其高表达)得到的菌株中,有些内切酶和滤纸酶活都提高;有些则只有内切酶活提高,滤纸酶活反而降低。针对该结果,编辑就认为数据结果中提高的滤纸酶活降低,相当于降低了菌株利用纤维素的能力,削弱了文章的新意。

想请教各位,我是应该把这些所谓的“影响文章新意”的类似数据删去,还是应该坚持自己做出来的结果并加以说明?

要赶在六月份毕业,敬请各位指教!如有投稿该期刊的经验,也请多多传授!

谢谢大家了!
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

melodyxin

铜虫 (小有名气)

编辑意见如下:

Dear Dr. ****,

We have received the reports from our advisors on your manuscript, "*****", which you submitted to World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology.

Based on the advice received, I feel that your manuscript could be reconsidered for publication should you be prepared to revise it to incorporate major revisions. When preparing your revised manuscript, you are asked to carefully consider the reviewer comments which are attached, and submit a list of responses to the comments.
Please also submit your response as separate submission item.

If one or more reviewers have uploaded files related to their reviews, these files can be found on line, and you should download and read them carefully.

We regret that the constraints of Journal space and editorial time do not allow more than one revision. If the revisions you make do not satisfy the editors and/or reviewers, the manuscript will be rejected. If you need further guidance on your revision, please contact the Editorial Office.

Please also, if you have not already done so, make certain that the English language in the manuscript is correct and intelligible. If you have any doubts, please have your manuscript checked by a native English speaker.

In order to submit your revised manuscript, please access the following web site:

http://wibi.edmgr.com/

Your username is: ******
Your password is: ******

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript within
six weeks.

With kind regards,
Paul Christakopoulos, PhD
Associate Editor
4楼2011-02-15 19:29:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 10 个回答

melodyxin

铜虫 (小有名气)

又想了想,有三种选择:

一是,将不利于文章新意的数据删去,补上合适的数据;
二是,坚持现有数据,向审稿人说明自己的目的只是为了顺利表达异源的内切酶基因,滤纸酶活降低很可能与基因的整合位置有关,还需进一步验证;
三是,补上部分数据,对实验结果作出解释。
2楼2011-02-15 18:30:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

melodyxin

铜虫 (小有名气)

不知道该如何选择合适?请大家指教!
3楼2011-02-15 18:32:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ziyeweng

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
引用回帖:
Originally posted by melodyxin at 2011-02-15 18:28:06:
两个审稿人,一个提了三个大修意见,三个小修意见;另一个则提了20条很细的意见。主编的意思,是要求我根据审稿人意见进行大修,而且提醒我只有一次修改机会。

认真看了下,大修意见的其中一条是觉得我的研究目 ...

我觉得将不利于文章新意的数据删去,补上合适的数据,这样发表机会更大
wwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
5楼2011-02-15 19:55:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见