| 查看: 7416 | 回复: 86 | ||||
| 本帖产生 2 个 ESEPI ,点击这里进行查看 | ||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||||
zjdaniel金虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
【Discussion】About Grammatical and Writing Mistakes in English Cafe
|
|||
EC~cabbage and radish soup | Eng. discussion |
» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)
» 猜你喜欢
售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有6人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有9人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有8人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有9人回复
国社科又开始会评了,不知道这次命运如何
已经有14人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有8人回复
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上)
已经有13人回复
售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题,而不是去凝练问题
已经有14人回复

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
lppv(金币+5, ESEPI+1): good suggestion, now, I understand you totally. just before reading this, I was a little confused about what you are doing.that is really a way to avoid mistakes as far as possible and does not make the writers embarrassed. 2011-04-27 16:28:29
curton: 回帖置顶 2013-12-01 23:50:08
lppv(金币+5, ESEPI+1): good suggestion, now, I understand you totally. just before reading this, I was a little confused about what you are doing.that is really a way to avoid mistakes as far as possible and does not make the writers embarrassed. 2011-04-27 16:28:29
curton: 回帖置顶 2013-12-01 23:50:08
|
Basically, I agree with correcting the errors. But it's really too complicated to operate,cause those who come here for relaxation will feel pressed and embarrassed. Also, too many public correctings will make beginers hard to speak more. There are, me for example, still many worms for updating there skills and abilities that don't like to be misled to the wrong usage of English,so I guess correcting is still necessary. How about this: we, not only those moderators, are all responsible,no superior or inferior, at the correcting thing. But we should use a more underground way, by short messages,to tell the writer himself and the moderator. And he who had made this mistake will be responsible to correct the post at once.If not, the informed moderator can correct it to avoid misleadings,for example, in 24hrs. Any post that is corrected or audited should be marked as "verified" or some to clarify. I'm sure this will be a lot of work for the moderators, but that's for all of our worms' better English practice atmsphere. And I'd like to be the very first volunteer to do this correcting~ |
52楼2011-04-25 16:05:27










回复此楼
15971404654
30