| 查看: 6557 | 回复: 86 | |||||
| 本帖产生 2 个 ESEPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||||
zjdaniel金虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
【Discussion】About Grammatical and Writing Mistakes in English Cafe
|
||||
|
I should appreciate the pure English atmosphere, but there is something to be mentioned. Grammatical and writing mistakes in English Cafe are very common, then there should be a way to improve the condition for better use! and then it comes to how to correct all these errors, or,you reckon,just let it go! In my humble opinion,it is time for us to discuss it! Mistakes in English Cafe be corrected or let it go! if correction is necessary,and how?  [ Last edited by zjdaniel on 2011-2-28 at 07:54 ] |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 EC~cabbage and radish soup | Eng. discussion |
» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）
15971404654» 猜你喜欢
河北省自然基金
已经有3人回复
-
本人42，博士刚毕业，现在找不到工作，怎么办？:(
已经有8人回复
-
没考上92，去双非就完了？其实你还有……
已经有6人回复
-
交大在职博士（哲学、社会学）
已经有5人回复
-
3,4-二羟基苯乙酮如何纯化？
已经有5人回复
-
国基评审
已经有10人回复
-
析晶
已经有5人回复
-
国自然面上和省基金B类撒花
已经有22人回复
-
2026-博士申请
已经有4人回复
-
26级硕士毕业生求博导收留
已经有4人回复
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
lppv(金币+5, ESEPI+1): good suggestion, now, I understand you totally. just before reading this, I was a little confused about what you are doing.that is really a way to avoid mistakes as far as possible and does not make the writers embarrassed. 2011-04-27 16:28:29
curton: 回帖置顶 2013-12-01 23:50:08
lppv(金币+5, ESEPI+1): good suggestion, now, I understand you totally. just before reading this, I was a little confused about what you are doing.that is really a way to avoid mistakes as far as possible and does not make the writers embarrassed. 2011-04-27 16:28:29
curton: 回帖置顶 2013-12-01 23:50:08
|
Basically, I agree with correcting the errors. But it's really too complicated to operate,cause those who come here for relaxation will feel pressed and embarrassed. Also, too many public correctings will make beginers hard to speak more. There are, me for example, still many worms for updating there skills and abilities that don't like to be misled to the wrong usage of English,so I guess correcting is still necessary. How about this: we, not only those moderators, are all responsible,no superior or inferior, at the correcting thing. But we should use a more underground way, by short messages,to tell the writer himself and the moderator. And he who had made this mistake will be responsible to correct the post at once.If not, the informed moderator can correct it to avoid misleadings,for example, in 24hrs. Any post that is corrected or audited should be marked as "verified" or some to clarify. I'm sure this will be a lot of work for the moderators, but that's for all of our worms' better English practice atmsphere. And I'd like to be the very first volunteer to do this correcting~ |
52楼2011-04-25 16:05:27