| 查看: 6697 | 回复: 86 | ||||
| 本帖产生 2 个 ESEPI ,点击这里进行查看 | ||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||||
zjdaniel金虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
【Discussion】About Grammatical and Writing Mistakes in English Cafe
|
|||
EC~cabbage and radish soup | Eng. discussion |
» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.5.5.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.5.5.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.5.5.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.5.5.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.5.5.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
药化及相关博士的申请
已经有3人回复
一篇MDPI论文改变了学习工作和生活
已经有4人回复
一个化合物的合成路线:CAS:367929-02-0 名称:8β-乙烯基雌二醇
已经有4人回复
太白金星有点烦
已经有3人回复
中国地质大学(北京)博士招生补录,数理学院材料科学与工程专业和材料与化工专业
已经有3人回复

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
lppv(金币+5, ESEPI+1): good suggestion, now, I understand you totally. just before reading this, I was a little confused about what you are doing.that is really a way to avoid mistakes as far as possible and does not make the writers embarrassed. 2011-04-27 16:28:29
curton: 回帖置顶 2013-12-01 23:50:08
lppv(金币+5, ESEPI+1): good suggestion, now, I understand you totally. just before reading this, I was a little confused about what you are doing.that is really a way to avoid mistakes as far as possible and does not make the writers embarrassed. 2011-04-27 16:28:29
curton: 回帖置顶 2013-12-01 23:50:08
|
Basically, I agree with correcting the errors. But it's really too complicated to operate,cause those who come here for relaxation will feel pressed and embarrassed. Also, too many public correctings will make beginers hard to speak more. There are, me for example, still many worms for updating there skills and abilities that don't like to be misled to the wrong usage of English,so I guess correcting is still necessary. How about this: we, not only those moderators, are all responsible,no superior or inferior, at the correcting thing. But we should use a more underground way, by short messages,to tell the writer himself and the moderator. And he who had made this mistake will be responsible to correct the post at once.If not, the informed moderator can correct it to avoid misleadings,for example, in 24hrs. Any post that is corrected or audited should be marked as "verified" or some to clarify. I'm sure this will be a lot of work for the moderators, but that's for all of our worms' better English practice atmsphere. And I'd like to be the very first volunteer to do this correcting~ |
52楼2011-04-25 16:05:27












回复此楼
15971404654