24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

xuyangcheng

金虫 (著名写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1131.2
散金: 810
帖子: 1125
在线: 197小时
虫号: 1019534
注册: 2010-05-16
性别: GG
专业: 农业昆虫学

[交流] 撤销90篇文章！你敢想么？已有1人参与

Sample Text

2月4日，德国路德维希港医院（Klinikum Ludwigshafen）和德国莱茵兰法尔茨国家医学协会（German state medical association of Rheinland Pfalz）宣布在Joachim Boldt接受检查的115篇论文中有90篇缺少伦理委员会（Institutional Review Board, IRB）的批准。
有11份期刊因此联合发表声明，称缺少IRB的批准意味着一篇文章会自动被撤。因而，Boldt的这90篇文章很有可能会遭到撤销。

90 Papers by German Could Be Retracted on Ethics Concerns

An ongoing investigation into the work of a German anaesthesiologist may lead to as many as 90 retractions. Joachim Boldt was fired in November from his job as head of anesthesia at the Klinikum Ludwigshafen after an investigation into a 2009 paper raised suspicions that the study described in the article had never taken place. Boldt has published more than 300 articles, many about the safety of a type of fluid replacement used during surgery called hydroxyethyl starch . Retraction Watch has been following the story in detail.

Today, the Klinikum Ludwigshafen and the German state medical association of Rheinland Pfalz announced that 90 of 115 studies they examined lacked proper approval from an institutional review board (IRB).

That prompted a joint letter from the editors of 11 journals stating that lack of IRB approval is grounds for automatic retraction of an article. The editor of Anaesthesia & Analgesia, where the 2009 paper was published, also issued a statement, and the journal published four editorials about the case online.

The clinic's investigation is ongoing. They said in a statement today that there is no evidence that patients were harmed in any of the studies. Experts in Germany, however, are now recommending against routine use of hydroxyethyl starch given the questions surrounding Boldt's work.

回复此楼