²é¿´: 7416  |  »Ø¸´: 32
¡¾½±Àø¡¿ ±¾Ìû±»ÆÀ¼Û10´Î£¬×÷ÕßghuiÔö¼Ó½ð±Ò 6.4 ¸ö
µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû

ghui

Ìú³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)


[×ÊÔ´] ÒäÆð¹ýÍùÊ£¬ÂúÊÇÐÁËáÀᡪ¡ªJACS½ÓÊÕǰµÄÐÄ·Àú³Ì ÒÑÓÐ21È˲ÎÓë

ÒäÆð¹ýÍùÊ£¬ÂúÊÇÐÁËáÀᡪ¡ªJACS½ÓÊÕǰµÄÐÄ·Àú³Ì
×÷Õߣº¸ß»Ô


дÔÚÇ°ÃæµÄ»°£ºÎÄÕ¸ոձ»»¯Ñ§ÁìÓò×îÖØÒª×îÓÐÓ°ÏìÁ¦µÄÆÚ¿¯JACS£¨Journal of the American Chemical Society£¬ÃÀ¹ú»¯Ñ§»áÖ¾£©½ÓÊÕ£¬ÐÀο֮Ó࣬½«ÆäÖеÄÐÄ·Àú³Ì׫дÈçÏ£¬ÒÔ´Ë×÷Ϊ¶ÔСľ³æÒÔ¼°¹ã´ó³æÓÑÃǵĻر¨£¬µ«ÓÐÒ»¶þ¶Ô³æÓÑÃÇÓÐÒæÕߣ¬Ò²²»Í÷´ËÐÁ£¡µ±È»ÎÒûÓÐÍü¼Ç£¬ÎÒÈÔÈ»ÊǸöС²ËÄñ£¬ÈÔÈ»ÐèÒªÏòͬÐÐÃÇѧϰ£¬»¶Ó­³æÓÑÃǸúÎÒ½»Á÷£¬ÈÃÎÒÃǹ²Í¬½ø²½°É£¡



¶àÉÙ´ÎÒ¹¾²ÈËÏ¡µÄУµÀÉÏõáõá¶øÐУ¿

¶àÉÙ´Î˯ÑÛÐÊâìÕõÔú×ÅÅÀ³ö±»ÎÑÈ¥´ò¿ªÊµÑéÊÒµÄÃÅ£¿

¶àÉÙ´ÎÐĸ¡ÆøÔê×øÁ¢²»°²Óû¿ÞÎÞÀ᣿

¶àÉٴβ»¿°Öظº»ÐÈô¾ø¾³¿´²»µ½Ò»¶¡µã¹âÃ÷£¿

¶àÉٴγÁĬÁËÇ×È˵ÄÎʺò£¿¶àÉٴε¡ÂýÁËÅóÓѵÄͨÐÅ£¿¶àÉÙ´ÎÍÆÑÓÁËͬѧµÄÑûÇ룿

¶àÉٴ맫ÚûÓлؼҶȹý£¿¶àÉٴξۻá»òÕ߻ûÓлý¼«²Î¼Ó£¿

¶àÉÙ´ÎÉí±ßµÄÁ¼³½ÃÀ¾°´íʧ£¿¶àÉÙ´ÎÖØÒªµÄ»ú»áûÓкúðÑÎÕ£¿

¶àÉÙ´ÎÔÚͼÊé¹ÝµÄÊé¼Üǰ±»Õ𺳣¿¶àÉٴξ«²ÊµÄÑݽ²Ã»ÓÐÈ¥Ìý£¿

¶àÉÙ´ÎÂú»³ÆÚ´ýÖճɻÃÃΣ¿

¶àÉÙ´ÎÖ£ÖØ³Ðŵ»¯ÎªÅÝÓ°£¿

¡­¡­

ÈÕ¸´Ò»ÈÕ£¬Ä긴һÄ꣬ËêÔµ½µ×²»ÈÄÈË£¬Èç½ñ½«Òª²½Èë¶øÁ¢Ö®ÄêÈ´Ôõô¶¼Á¢²»ÆðÀ´£¿³ä³â×ÅÎÞÄÎѹÒÖמóÇ¿ÒÀÈ»æÝȻһÉí£¬¹¦²»³ÉÃû²»¾ÍÀÏ´ó²»Ð¡ÁË»¹Òª¼ÒÈ˲ÙÐÄ£¬ÄêÉÙÇá¿ñµÄËùν±§¸ºÔçÒÑÏûʧÁËÓ°×Ù£¬½ÓÊÜ׏²ºÍ¹úµÄÏ´ÀñÈ´ÖäÂî×ÅÏÖʵµÄ²»Æ½£¬°®¹úÐֵܵÄ×»×»½Ì»åÈ´ÔõôҲÆð²»ÁË×÷Óã¬Ò»±ßÇîÀ§£¬Ò»±ß·ßÇà¡­¡­

ÖÕÓÚ£¬·ñ¼«Ì©À´²»ÔÙÊÇÃΣ¬JACSµÄÈÏ¿ÉʹÎҴ˿̳ÉΪ×îÐÒÔ˵ÄÈË¡£

ÄÇÊǶþÁãÁãÁùÄêµÄÇﶬ£¬ÄÇʱÁÖ־ǿÀÏʦµÄרӢҪÇóÓÃÓ¢Óï½²×Ô¼ºµÄ»¯Ñ§Ñо¿presentation£¬ÄÇʱÎÒÔÚѧÊõÉÏÒ»ÎÞËùÓУ¬³ýÁËÂúÇ»µÄÈÈÇ飬ÄÇʱ¿Â׿·æÊ¦ÐÖ¸øÁËÎÒһƪµ±ÄêµÄJPCBºÍһƪCR£¬¡°¾ÍÄÃÈ¥½²Õâ¸ö°É¡±£¬¶¼ÊǹØÓÚÁ×Ëáõ¥Ë®½âµÄÂÛÎÄ¡£ÄÇÊǶþÁãÁãÆßÄêµÄ¿ª´º£¬·½È½Ê¦ÐÖµÄÒ»´ÎÎÄÏײéеõ½Ò»ÆªÉÐûÓÐÒ³ÂëµÄ¸Õ¸ÕÔÚJACS¿¯³öµÄ½ðÊôµ¥Ð¿ÅäºÏÎï´ß»¯Á×Ëáõ¥Ë®½â»úÀíµÄÑо¿ÂÛÎÄ¡£´Ó´Ë¼á¶¨ÁËÎÒÃþË÷ÉîÈëÏÂÈ¥µÄ¾öÐÄ¡£ÃþË÷£¬²»Í£µØÃþË÷£¬³¢ÊÔ£¬²»Í£µÄ³¢ÊÔ£¬ÎÞÊý´ÎµÄʧ°Ü£¬ÎÞÊý´ÎµÄÔÓÆßÔӰ˵ÄÊÂÇ飬ȴ²¢Ã»Óж¯Ò¡ÎÒ¼ÌÐøÃþË÷ÏÂÈ¥µÄ¾öÐÄ¡£ÒòΪԽ×ßÏÂÈ¥Ô½¾õµÃ×Ô¼ºµÄÎÞÖªÃìС£¬ÕýËùνѧÎÞÖ¹¾³¡£´Ëºó£¬¿Â׿·æÊ¦Ðֵijö¹úÁôÑóÒ»Ä꣬ҲÕýÊÇÎÒÔÓÆßÔÓ°ËÉõÖÁ³Û³ÒÈý¹úÓÎÏ·µÄÒ»Ä꣬ÆÚ¼äËãÁËÁ½¸öÔÂÒ¶±£»ÔÀÏʦµÄË®´Ø£¬ÎÞ¹û£¬ºóÒ¶·¢ÁËJACS£¬¾Ý˵µ±Ê±ÈôÄܼÆËã³öÀ´µÄ»°ÊÇ×¼±¸·¢ScienceµÄ£¬ÎÞÄÎÎÒµ±Ê±Ì«Ë®Ì«ÄÛ¡£ÆÚ¼ä¸üÊÇËãÁ˰ëÄêÉõÖÁ½«½üÒ»ÄêµÄSm¿¨±ö»·±ûÍ黯·´Ó¦£¬ÖÕ¾õÎÞȤ£¬ÓÐÊý¾Ýȴδ³ÉÎÄ£¬ÒàÊôÎÞ¹û¡£×ªÑÛ¼ä¶þÁãÁã°ËÄêµÄÇﶬµ½ÁË£¬ÎÒÒ²Õýʽ²©Ê¿ÁË£¬Ë«Ð¿ÅäºÏÎï´ß»¯Á×Ëáõ¥Ë®½â»úÀíµÄ×îÐÂʵÑéÑо¿ÕýºÃ¸Õ³öÀ´£¬ÕâÕýÊÇÎÒËùÆÚÅεģ¬ÎÒÒ²´Ó´ËǰµÄµ¥Ð¿ÃþË÷¸æÒ»¶ÎÂ䣬Á×Ëáõ¥µÄ¼ÆËãÈÔȻͣÁôÔÚHF/3-21Gˮƽ¡£Áã°ËÄêÊ®¶þÔµIJ©Ê¿¿ªÌⱨ¸æËäÈ»ÓÐÁËһЩ³õ²½µÄ˼·£¬Ò²×ÅʵÓÐÒ»µãµã³õ²½½á¹û£¬µ«ÕâÔ¶Ô¶²»¹»£¬¡­¡­¼ÌÐøÃþË÷£¬ÆäÖеļèÐÁÓÖÆñÊÇÖ»ÑÔÆ¬ÓïËùÄܸÅÊö£¿¸úÎÒÒ»ÆðÉÏÑжÁ²©µÄÈ˺ü¸¸ö¶¼ÒѾ­ÔçÔç·¢ÁËÎÄÕ£¬µÃÁ˽±Ñ§½ð£¬ÒÑÎÞ±ÏҵѹÁ¦£¬Ö»Ðè×ö×Ô¼ºÏ²»¶×öµÄÊÂÇ飬¶øÎÒÈ´»¹ÔÚѹÁ¦Ö®Ï¼èÄÑǰÐУ¬ÔÚÁã¾ÅÄêÆßÔ¿ÂʦÐÖÈ¥ÈÕ±¾Ç°Íê³É³õ¸å£¬µ½Ò»ÁãÄêÆßÔ·ÝͶ¸åµ½JACS£¬ÕûÕûÐÞ¸ÄÁËÒ»Ä꣬ÕâÒ»Äê¹ýµÃÌ«¹ýÂþ³¤Ì«¹ýÐÁÀÍ¡£Ã»°ì·¨£¬ÕâÊÇÎÒдµÄµÚһƪÎÄÕ£¬¶øÇÒÓÖÊÇҪͶJACSµÄ£¬ÔÚÓë¿ÂʦÐÖºÍNathan¼¸´ÎÓʼþºó£¬Ó²ÊDZﰡ±ï£¬¸Ä°¡¸Ä£¬×ÜËã×îÖÕÍê¸å¡£



ÏÂÃæÊÇJACSÉó¸åÐÞ¸ÄÈ«¼Ç¼£º

2010.7.29  Í¶¸åµ½JACS

2010.8.19 µÚÒ»´ÎÐÞ¸ÄÒâ¼û·µ»Ø£¬ËĸöÉó¸åÈË£¬ÆäÖÐǰÁ½¸öÉó¸åÈ˽¨ÒéСÐ޸ķ¢±í£¬ºóÁ½¸ö´óÐ޸ĺóÔÙÉó

2010.10.17µÚÒ»´ÎÐ޸ĸ巢³öÈ¥£¨Ã»°ì·¨£¬¸ù¾ÝÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼ûÓÖËãÁ˽«½üÁ½¸öÔ£©

2010.11.7µÚ¶þ´ÎÐÞ¸ÄÒâ¼û·µ»Ø£¬µÚËÄÉó¸åÈËÍêȫͬÒ⣬µÚÈýÉó¸åÈËÈ´ÈÏΪÎÒÃǵĻظ´Ã»ÓÐÖØÊÓËûµÄÒâ¼û

2010.12.12µÚ¶þ´ÎÐ޸ĸ巢³ö£¨ÓÖËãÁËÒ»¸öÔ£¬½Ìѵ°¡£ºÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼ûÔÙÔõÃ´ÖØÊÓ¶¼²»¹ý·Ö£¬½÷¼Ç°¡£©

2011.1.6 µÚÈý´ÎÐÞ¸ÄÒâ¼û·µ»Ø£¬£¨ÔÚ¾­ÀúÁËÒ»¸öÂþ³¤µÄ½¹ÂǵȴýºóìþìýµÄÐÄ×ÜËãÓÐÁ˵ãο½åÁË£¬È«ÊÇTOP5£©

2011.1.9µÚÈý´ÎÐ޸ĸ巢³ö

2011.1.10JACS½ÓÊÕ



»Ø¹ËÕû¸öÀ­¾âÕ½¹ý³Ì£¬ÎÒ±ØÐëÏòÕâËÄλÉó¸åÈËÖÂÒÔ×î³ç¸ßµÄ¾´Ò⣬ËûÃǶ¼ÊÇÕâ¸öÁìÓò×î×î¶¥¼âµÄ¿ÆÑ§¼Ò£¨ÆäÖÐÖÁÉÙÓÐÈýλ¿ÉÒÔÈ·¶¨ÊÇÎÒÍÆ¼öÉó¸åÈËÀïµÄÁùλţÈËÖеģ¬ÍƼöÉó¸åÈËÒ²ÊÇÒ»ÃÅѧÎÊ£¬ºÇºÇ£¬ÒªÖªµÀ£¬ÎÒ¼«²»ÇéÔ¸°ÑÕâЩµÂ¸ßÍûÖØµÄÅ£ÈËÃÇÓë¹úÄںܶàÅû×ÅѧÊõÍâÒµÄÉÌÈËÃÇ·ÅÔÚÒ»Æð£¬ÄÇÑùÊǶÔÕâЩ¿ÆÑ§Á¼ÖªµÄÈ˵ÄÙô䣩£¬¶øÎÒÕâ¸öС²ËÄñ£¬Äܵõ½ËûÃǵÄÖ¸µã£¬´Ó¶øÊ¹µÃÎÄÕ¸ü¼ÓPerfect£¨¾¡¹Ü¶àËãÁ˺ü¸¸öÔ£¬¾¡¹ÜÌáÐĵõµ¨Õ½Õ½¾¤¾¤Á˺ü¸¸öÔ£©¡£



ÒÔÏÂÊÇJACSµÄ×ܵįÀÉó½áÂÛ»ã×Ü£º

Reviewer: 1
Significance: High
Novelty: Moderate
Broad interest: High
Scholarly presentation: High
Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: Yes
Are the literature references appropriate and correct?: Yes
Do the contents justify the length of this manuscript?: Yes


Reviewer: 2
Significance: High
Novelty: High
Broad interest: High
Scholarly presentation: High
Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: Yes
Are the literature references appropriate and correct?: In Part
Do the contents justify the length of this manuscript?: Yes

Reviewer: 3£¨µÚÈý´ÎÆÀÉó½áÂÛ£©
Significance: Top 5
Novelty: Highest (top 5)
Broad interest: Highest (top 5)
Scholarly presentation: Highest (top 5)
Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: Yes
Are the literature references appropriate and correct?: Yes
Do the contents justify the length of this manuscript?: Yes

Reviewer: 4£¨µÚ¶þ´ÎÆÀÉó½áÂÛ£©
Significance: High
Novelty: High
Broad interest: High
Scholarly presentation: High
Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: Yes
Are the literature references appropriate and correct?: Yes
Do the contents justify the length of this manuscript?: Yes


ÒÔÏÂÊÇJACSµÄ×ܵįÀÉóÒâ¼û»ã×Ü£º

Éó¸åÈËÒ»£º

This paper reports the results of a density functional computational study of the mechanism of phosphate diester cleavage catalyzed by a dinuclear Zn(II) complex. These calculations use a polarizable continuum model to estimate solvation energies for the charged catalyst and reactants. I am not qualified to comment on the quality of the calculations. However, the computational modeling of this metal-ion complex catalyzed reaction presents a very difficult challenge, and I suspect that the author's apparent success is a significant achievement. In addition, the authors have an excellent understanding of earlier experimental studies on these metal ion complexcatalyzed reactions. The agreement between the calculated and observed barrier for the catalyzed cleavage of 2-hydroxypropyl-4-nitrophenyl phosphate is evidence that these calculations provide a true structure for the reaction transition state. In addition, the computational results provide an interesting structure for the Michaelis complex and insight into the reaction mechanism not obtained in experimental studies. This work will attract the attention of computational, organic and inorganic chemists interested in reaction mechanisms.

Publication in JACS is recommended, subject to the author's considerations of the following comments and questions.


Éó¸åÈ˶þ£º

This manuscript reports a DFT computational study of the hydrolysis of the phosphodiester HpPNP by a binuclear zinc catalyst for which a series of physical organic experimental studies provided data suggestive of a concerted mechanism. The authors¡¯ calculations support that conclusion, as well as the proposals regarding the protonation state of the active species. The abundance of experimental data make this a good system for a computational analysis, and the calculations reproduce the experimental results reasonably well. New insight comes from the nucleophile 18O KIE, which supports the idea that HpPNP binds to the catalyst with the nucleophile hydroxyl group coordinated to one of the zinc ions, and is subsequently deprotonated. This study thus gives a more concrete picture of the binding mode of the substrate to the catalyst than could be determined from experimental results. The binding mode of substrates to dinuclear metallophosphatases, and even to their small molecule model systems, remains an area of considerable uncertainty.

Publication is recommended after minor revisions are made.



Éó¸åÈËÈý£º

µÚÒ»´ÎÉó¸åÒâ¼û£º

In this MS the authors describe a DFT study on the cleavage of 2-hydroxypropyl pnitrophenyl phosphate (HpPNP) promoted by a dinuclear Zn(II) catalyst which wasexperimentally studied extensively by Richard and Morrow. The main findings of thiscomputational study are that the lowest energy computed pathway for cleavage ofHpPNP involves double activation of the phosphate by binding to the complex in a Zn(II)¡ªO-P-O¡ªZn(II) motif, followed by an equilibrium deprotonation of the hydroxypropyl group to form a Zn(II) associated 2-oxypropyl nucleophile which thennucleophilically attacks the phosphoryl unit in a concerted displacement of the pnitrophenoxy group. This pathway fits the mechanism favoured by Richard and Morrow, and supports additional heavy atom kinetic isotope effect studies by Hengge and Richard and Morrow. In addition the authors have computed a less favoured pathway for a stepwise reaction whereby additional waters coordinated to the catalyst displace the phosphate binding from two Zn(II) ions to one Zn(II) ion, with a H-bonding network to the other. This pathway has a general catalysis for the proton transfer with concurrent attack of the 2-oxypropyl group on the P to form a 5-coordinate phosphorane intermediate with subsequent fast departure of the phenoxide leaving group. Overall this is has the makings of a good paper where the computational results on a fairly well-defined system fit with what is known experimentally, and the computation does add to what we know about that system. I have some points that would make the MS clearer and more precise with the presentation.

µÚ¶þ´ÎÆÀÉóÒâ¼û£º
¸úFan and GaoµÄÄÇÆªÎïÀí»¯Ñ§µÄ±¨µÀµÄ·¾¶µÄ±È½Ï
¼õÉÙNBO·ÖÎöµÄÈ¨ÖØ

µÚÈý´ÎÉó¸åÒâ¼û
This is a vastly improved presentation of what is certainly an important contribution to the literature pertaining to a two metal ion catalyzed cleavage reactions of phosphodiesters as models for metallonuclease catalyzed processes. I read this version with interest, in particular the nice presentation of the effects of the various additional calculation parameterization which clearly lead to important energy differences between the methods. I am now happy with the conclusions made, and in particular a more careful comparison of the general-base process of Fan and Gao with the concerted process here, when calculated by methods with the same parameterization. The ms can be published essentially as is, but the authors might like to consider the following three points.
   
Éó¸åÈËËÄ£º

µÚÒ»´ÎÆÀÉóÒâ¼û£º
The authors use DFT calculations to investigate the mechanism for the cleavage of an RNA analogue HpPNP catalyzed by a dinuclear Zn(II) complex Zn2(L2O). The authors identify a plausible cleavage mechanism, which is a fairly routine task with quantum chemical methods. Meanwhile, the authors fall short when characterizing the role of the catalyst, which would have a significant impact in the context of catalyst design. As such, the study is not suitable for publication in JACS in its present form, but may be suitable for other ACS journals. That being said, if a more thorough analysis of the role of the catalyst was performed, and the manuscript was modified accordingly, the study may become suitable for publication in JACS. I would encourage the authors to attempt this route, and provide the following comments regarding the analysis of the mechanism and role of the catalyst.

µÚ¶þ´ÎÆÀÉóÒâ¼û£º
The authors have addressed main point of my previous comments regarding the need for a detailed discussion of the role of the catalyst (comment 1 in my previous report) by adding a section devoted to this purpose. As such, I believe the manuscript is now in sufficient form for publication in JACS.

[ Last edited by ghui on 2011-1-24 at 16:56 ]
»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥

» ÊÕ¼±¾ÌûµÄÌÔÌûר¼­ÍƼö

ÂÛÎÄд×÷ Ͷ¸å ÔÓ־Ͷ¸å fork u

» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶

» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:

ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

ljwang168

Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)


¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï ÎåÐǼ¶,ÓÅÐãÍÆ¼ö

¹§Ï²Â¥Ö÷£¬Õ´µãÏ²Æø£¬
29Â¥2011-01-23 22:30:30
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
²é¿´È«²¿ 33 ¸ö»Ø´ð

shizishanshang

ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)


¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï ÎåÐǼ¶,ÓÅÐãÍÆ¼ö

¹§Ï²Â¥Ö÷£¬Ï£ÍûÎÒÒ²ÔÚÎÒÃÇÁìÓòµÄTOP10£¥ÆÚ¿¯·¢ÆªÎÄÕ£¡
2Â¥2011-01-23 10:40:55
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

painforn

Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)


¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
¹§Ï²¡£·¢ÎÄÕÂÕæÊÇÍ´²¢¿ìÀÖ×Å¡£
4Â¥2011-01-23 10:58:41
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

niubilitier

½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)


¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Êǵģ¬Óи¶³ö±ØÓÐÊÕ»ñ£¬ºÃʶàÄ¥£¬¹§Ï²Â¥Ö÷
Õ´µãÏ²Æø
5Â¥2011-01-23 11:01:59
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
¡î ÎÞÐǼ¶ ¡ï Ò»ÐǼ¶ ¡ï¡ï¡ï ÈýÐǼ¶ ¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï ÎåÐǼ¶
×î¾ßÈËÆøÈÈÌûÍÆ¼ö [²é¿´È«²¿] ×÷Õß »Ø/¿´ ×îºó·¢±í
[¿¼ÑÐ] ½ÓÊÕµ÷¼Á +4 ½òÃȽòÃÈ 2026-03-02 7/350 2026-03-02 16:37 by ½òÃȽòÃÈ
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ç廪´óѧ ²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤ 353·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á +3 awaystay 2026-03-02 4/200 2026-03-02 16:35 by chuocheng
[¿¼ÑÐ] Çóµ÷¼Á +9 yunziaaaaa 2026-03-01 10/500 2026-03-02 15:18 by °ë½ØµÄÊ«0927
[¿¼ÑÐ] 0856»¯¹¤×¨Ë¶Çóµ÷¼Á +15 ¶­boxing 2026-03-01 15/750 2026-03-02 15:06 by »Î»Î²»Ðí»Î
[¿¼ÑÐ] 303Çóµ÷¼Á +5 ½ñÏIJ»ÏÄ 2026-03-01 5/250 2026-03-02 15:01 by ÏòÉϵÄÅÖ¶«
[¿¼ÑÐ] 289Çóµ÷¼Á +4 yangæÃ 2026-03-02 4/200 2026-03-02 14:31 by ÏòÉϵÄÅÖ¶«
[¿¼²©] ³ÏÕÐũҵ²©Ê¿ +3 ÐÄÐÀÏòÈÙ 2026-02-28 3/150 2026-03-02 13:33 by ʱ¼ä²»¹·
[¿¼ÑÐ] 338Çóµ÷¼Á +3 18162027187 2026-03-02 3/150 2026-03-02 13:12 by houyaoxu
[¿¼ÑÐ] »¯¹¤270Çóµ÷¼Á +8 ʲôÃû×Öqwq 2026-03-02 8/400 2026-03-02 13:03 by houyaoxu
[¿¼ÑÐ] һ־Ըɽ¶«´óѧ²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤325Çóµ÷¼Á +3 °ë½ØµÄÊ«0927 2026-03-02 3/150 2026-03-02 12:58 by houyaoxu
[¿¼ÑÐ] 291 Çóµ÷¼Á +3 »¯¹¤2026½ì±ÏÒµÉ 2026-03-02 3/150 2026-03-02 12:55 by houyaoxu
[¿¼ÑÐ] 0805×Ü·Ö292£¬Çóµ÷¼Á +8 »ÃÏëÖ®éä 2026-03-01 8/400 2026-03-02 12:51 by Î޼ʵIJÝÔ­
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ³É¹ûϵͳ·ÃÎÊÁ¿´ó£¬Çë15·ÖÖÓºóÔÙ³¢ÊÔ¡£Óɴ˸øÄúÔì³ÉµÄ²»±ã£¬¾´ÇëÁ½⡣ +5 xhuama 2026-03-02 5/250 2026-03-02 12:34 by stidwellNK
[¿¼ÑÐ] 281Çóµ÷¼Á +5 2026¼ÆËã»ú_³ÏÐÄ 2026-03-01 8/400 2026-03-02 11:05 by Íô£¡£¿£¡
[¿¼ÑÐ] 0856Çóµ÷¼Á285 +10 ÂÀ×ÐÁú 2026-02-28 10/500 2026-03-01 21:37 by ¹«èªåÐÒ£
[¿¼ÑÐ] 298Çóµ÷¼Á +6 axyz3 2026-02-28 6/300 2026-03-01 19:00 by 18137688336
[¿¼ÑÐ] 291·Ö¹¤¿ÆÇóµ÷¼Á +9 science¶ö¶ö 2026-03-01 10/500 2026-03-01 18:55 by 18137688336
[¿¼²©] 26É격 +4 ÏëÉ격£¡ 2026-02-26 6/300 2026-03-01 17:32 by ÏëÉ격£¡
[¿¼ÑÐ] 285Çóµ÷¼Á +8 ÂúÍ·´óº¹µÄѧÉú 2026-02-28 8/400 2026-03-01 16:47 by caszguilin
[¿¼ÑÐ] Çóµ÷¼Á +6 repeatt?t 2026-02-28 6/300 2026-03-01 14:37 by Sakura»æ
ÐÅÏ¢Ìáʾ
ÇëÌî´¦ÀíÒâ¼û