24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

lingxu71

金虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
贵宾: 0.05
金币: 515.3
帖子: 120
在线: 83小时
虫号: 1169604

[交流] 编辑拒稿，再投还有希望吗？

被编辑拒稿了，主要认为写得太罗嗦。另外，这个编辑刚写了篇相关综述发在这个杂志（Carbohydrate Polymers），认为创新点不足。

以前往这个杂志投过不少论文，一直比较顺利，感觉编辑也比较友善。这次换成副编裁决了，很认同他的意见。不知道按编辑的意见好好修改后，再投一次有没有希望？

This manuscript suffers from a number of flaws:
1= Unacceptable writing style that does not correspond to the Carbohydrate Polymers style: repetitions, digressions, propaedeutic statements, comments at the elementary level, banalities and other flaws are present everywhere in the manuscript; there is much confusion between original data and bibliographic data because speculations and discussions are admixed with experimental information.
2= The main substances (A, B and C) line 113, are not adequately identified/characterized by instrumental analyses and therefore the scientific value of this work is nil.
3= Without making any assessment of merit at this time, the content of this manuscript might result to be of marginal originality in the light of the previous publications by several other authors.
For reasons under 1 and 2, the manuscript will not be endorsed by submission to the reviewers: regretfully it is hereby rejected.
后面附了一篇编辑新发布的论文。

回复此楼