| 查看: 309 | 回复: 0 | |||
[交流]
【求助】寻求论文合作（从计算上解释为什么imidazole使Pt中毒，而1,2,4-triazole则不&
|
|
Dear all, I am curious about the theoretical (computational) explanation of the reason why 1,2,4-triazole is better than imidazole when Pt electrode is used. We have done much experimental work showing that imidazole poinsons Pt while 1,2,4-triazole is much better. Any one who is able to do it, please contact me I am very interested in cooperation with you on the theoretical explanation for the paper we are writing. The paper is aiming at Electrochemisty Communication. If you can help us explain why imidazole poisons Pt and why 1,2,4-triazole doesn't poison Pt electrode, you will surely be the 2nd author. And we just need a brief explanation using computational chemistry (e.g. ab initio etc) Thanks! ps: I am in Germany. My contact email is: proticils@gmail.com. one paper as case in point is: Fluorinated Imidazoles as Proton Carriers for Water-Free Fuel Cell Membranes http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja046999y |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
中国科学院兰州化物所夏令营招生
已经有1人回复
-
γ-NiOOH的cif文件求助
已经有0人回复
-
物理化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有236人回复
-
国家青年基金祈福
已经有56人回复
-
分子筛催化剂
已经有1人回复
-
青岛大学国家优青团队急招一名26年秋季入学博士（报名截止时间为6月17号下午1点）
已经有8人回复
-
福建理工大学资源化学专业正式获批并启动招生
已经有24人回复
-
Crystals（IF=2.9）- Special Issue invatation- Functional Materials
已经有0人回复
-
分子筛催化方向 一篇cej共一第一 可以申请上海什么学校呢
已经有2人回复