| 查看: 350 | 回复: 0 | |||
[交流]
【求助】寻求论文合作（从计算上解释为什么imidazole使Pt中毒，而1,2,4-triazole则不&
|
|
Dear all, I am curious about the theoretical (computational) explanation of the reason why 1,2,4-triazole is better than imidazole when Pt electrode is used. We have done much experimental work showing that imidazole poinsons Pt while 1,2,4-triazole is much better. Any one who is able to do it, please contact me I am very interested in cooperation with you on the theoretical explanation for the paper we are writing. The paper is aiming at Electrochemisty Communication. If you can help us explain why imidazole poisons Pt and why 1,2,4-triazole doesn't poison Pt electrode, you will surely be the 2nd author. And we just need a brief explanation using computational chemistry (e.g. ab initio etc) Thanks! ps: I am in Germany. My contact email is: proticils@gmail.com. one paper as case in point is: Fluorinated Imidazoles as Proton Carriers for Water-Free Fuel Cell Membranes http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja046999y |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
中国科大仿生界面材料科学全国重点实验室戴懿涛研究员/江雷院士团队招聘科研助理
已经有0人回复
-
中国科大仿生界面材料科学全国重点实验室戴懿涛研究员/江雷院士团队招聘科研助理
已经有0人回复
-
专业论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有92人回复
-
寻求物理化学学报最新的投稿模板！
已经有4人回复
-
东南大学杰青/海优团队招聘催化方向博士后
已经有866人回复
-
投稿咨询
已经有7人回复
-
自科面上 散金币 祈福
已经有61人回复
-
铁钼催化剂成型
已经有2人回复
-
求问：LATP煅烧应该使用什么容器？
已经有0人回复
-
西安交通大学 赵旭课题组 招收研究助理--电催化方向
已经有1人回复
-
西安交通大学 赵旭课题组 2026年招收博士后-电催化方向
已经有0人回复
10