| 查看: 427 | 回复: 1 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
[交流]
跟着斑竹写作文－Issue17
|
|||
|
Issue17. There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, do disobey and resist unjust laws. 第一段：法律的作用。 第二段：由于社会的复杂性，法律不可能面面俱到。 第三段：从上面一段的分析中可以看出法律的公平性是相对的，设想一下仅仅对抗这种法律带来的严重后果。 第四段：当然，对于那些倾向性明显的法律，也不能姑息纵容。但是正确的态度应该是理性的分析和思考，而不是粗暴的对抗。 结尾：重申观点。 Let us neglect laws in autocratic countries first, because in such cases, the only function of law is to govern the people, and factually there is no justness or unjustness there at all. Accordingly, disobedience and resistance is necessary to gain human rights. Whereas in democratic nations, in most cases, laws are used to against crimes, protect people’s right and ultimately make the society a peaceful, orderly and relatively stable one. They aim at the whole society currently as well as long-termly. However, there do exist some kind of “unjust laws” in a way. In my view, people should not just disobey and resist such unjust laws, because this “extreme action” may cause more damage rather than maintain a orderly and relatively stable society. As the primary goal of laws is the whole society, inevitably there will be unjust laws. It is a common sense that society is so complicated—it include various aspects, such as its citizens from infants to the olds, people and all kinds of groups, organizations in diversified fields and so on—laws are not omnipotent to make sure that every aspect have identical right. Just think yourself as the legislator, then how do you handle with such situations: some factory continuingly polluted the water of a district thus make the residents there suffer from effluvia and health hazard caused by the polluted water, how do you make both the factory and people satisfied in that district? Or a new dam is being built along a river to provide thousands of people’s need for electric power with the expense of reluctant migration of enormous inhabitants there, then how can you protect that inhabitant’s home by law? What they want is just steady-going living. Such things nearly happen everyday everywhere. Laws, at most times, have to assure a long-term goal rather than current profits to maintain the long-term development and stabilization of a society, such as the punishment and restrict of environment-polluted industries; or to protect the multitude’s right, such as the electric power need of the majorities. That means the justness of law is relative—totally absolute just laws are inexistent. What, if every individual disobey and resist such “unjust laws” as the assertion claimed, will happen? Such individuals selfishly pay attention the benefits of their own and neglect that of the others’ or a long-term harmony of the society, and their short-sighted action will cause severe aftermath. Admittedly, sometimes there might be laws inclined to some specific groups of people partially. However, in my opinion, arbitrarily disobey and resist such laws will expend the government too much manpower, money and energy to settle the situation rather than find out and solve the underlying problems beneath such unjust laws. So what people need is rational analysis and thinking, or else the final victims are still people. And that will truly disobey the spirit of law from a holistic perspective. Since the society is complex, the laws, which served the society, is not possibly to be simple just or unjust. What we need is to think and act rationally to keep a long-term stability and harmony of our society. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
面上合作单位盖章
已经有5人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有17人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有8人回复
-
导师吐槽：我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生！
已经有7人回复
-
申请删除本帖
已经有7人回复
-
基金不中，共勉
已经有10人回复
-
国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论
已经有11人回复
-
基金未中，这种答复是模板吗？
已经有6人回复
-
看板上这么多中的，有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉……
已经有6人回复
-
怎么看青基中了没有啊
已经有5人回复
hummer
荣誉版主 (职业作家)
人美在羽毛，鸟美在心灵
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 3.36
- 金币: 3852.6
- 红花: 15
- 沙发: 2
- 帖子: 4365
- 在线: 190.9小时
- 虫号: 70967
- 注册: 2005-05-27
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 学前教育学
- 管辖: 硕博家园
1
|
Issue17. There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, do disobey and resist unjust laws. 第一段：法律的作用。 第二段：由于社会的复杂性，法律不可能面面俱到。 第三段：从上面一段的分析中可以看出法律的公平性是相对的，设想一下仅仅对抗这种法律带来的严重后果。 第四段：当然，对于那些倾向性明显的法律，也不能姑息纵容。但是正确的态度应该是理性的分析和思考，而不是粗暴的对抗。 结尾：重申观点。 Let us neglect laws in autocratic countries first, because in such cases, the only function of law is to govern the people, and factually there is no justness or unjustness there at all. Accordingly, disobedience and resistance is necessary to gain human rights. Whereas in democratic nations, in most cases, laws are used to against crimes, protect people’s right and ultimately make the society a peaceful, orderly and relatively stable one(下定义的方法在议论文，显得很有深度，写得不错). They aim at the whole society currently as well as long-termly. However, there do exist some kind of “unjust laws” in a way(？in a way，这里已死是在某些地方，方面么？in some aspects). In my view, people should not just disobey and resist such unjust laws, because this “extreme action” may cause more damage rather than maintain a(an) orderly and relatively stable society As the primary goal of laws is the whole society（法律主要目的是真个社会？这里什么意思不清楚As the primary goal of laws stands for the will of the whole society不知道是不是我理解错了）, inevitably there will be unjust laws. It is a common sense that society is so complicated—it include various aspects, such as its citizens from infants to the olds, people and all kinds of groups, organizations in diversified fields and so on—laws are not omnipotent to make sure that every aspect have（has） identical right. Just think (suppose比think更书面一点吧) yourself as the legislator, then how do you handle with such situations: some factory continuingly polluted the water of a district thus make(made) the residents there suffer from effluvia and health hazard caused by the polluted water, how do you make both the factory and people satisfied in that district? Or a new dam is being built along a river to provide thousands of people’s need for electric power with the expense of reluctant migration of enormous inhabitants there, then how can you protect that inhabitant’s(those inhabitants’) home by law? What they want is just steady-going living. Such things nearly happen everyday everywhere. Laws, at most times, have to assure a long-term goal rather than current profits to maintain the long-term development and stabilization of a society, such as the punishment and restrict(restriction) of environment-polluted industries; or to protect the multitude’s right, such as the electric power need of the majorities. That means the justness of law is relative—totally absolute just laws are inexistent. What, if every individual disobey and resist such “unjust laws” as the assertion claimed, will happen? Such individuals selfishly pay attention the benefits of their own and neglect that of the others’ or a long-term harmony of the society, and their short-sighted action will cause severe aftermath. Admittedly, sometimes there might be laws inclined to some specific groups of people partially. However, in my opinion, arbitrarily disobey and resist such laws will expend the government too much manpower, money and energy to settle the situation rather than find out and solve the underlying problems beneath such unjust laws. So what people need is rational analysis and thinking, or else the final victims are still people. And that will truly disobey the spirit of law from a holistic perspective. Since the society is complex, the laws, which served the society, is not possibly to be simple(simply) just or unjust. What we need is to think and act rationally to keep a long-term stability and harmony of our society. 除了一些细小的错误，文章可谓一气呵成，段落写的流畅，中心明确，论证合理。 由hudifeng修改 |
2楼2006-07-11 20:11:03
投票:
