24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (4895)
>休闲灌水 (543)
>虫友互识 (406)
>导师招生 (383)
>文献求助 (365)
>论文投稿 (215)
>博后之家 (179)
>招聘信息布告栏 (142)
>考博 (106)
>硕博家园 (96)
>学术会议 (77)
>找工作 (53)
>基金申请 (43)
>教师之家 (39)
>育儿交流 (33)
>SciFinder/Reaxys (33)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

飞走的希望

木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 34 (小学生)
金币: 3796.4
帖子: 1863
在线: 912.2小时
虫号: 849848

[交流] 伦理道德号码求助？

各位大师，我在投文章时要求我出示一个号码，证实我是被授权才进行杀实验动物的，请问这是怎么回事？有没有高手给我解答一下/?
还有回复编辑有期限吗？那个期限在哪里看啊？
今天是元旦祝大家快乐

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2011-01-01 10:32:03

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

飞走的希望

木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 34 (小学生)
金币: 3796.4
帖子: 1863
在线: 912.2小时
虫号: 849848

这是我的专家审稿意见，谁给我看一下

Reviewer #2: The topic of the study is important in contemporary toxicology. The background is made clear and the purpose of the study is clearly stated. However, it is not clear how many animals were used in each group. In the description of the table 1 and 2 "n=10" is presented but it is not defined: is this the number of rats in all groups or in each seperate group? What does it mean "rats were less active..." (line 119). The Ethics Committee agreement number is not presented. The kind of killing arises serious doubts. Rats were killed by exsanguination during ether anaesthesia. Such a kind of killing is hardly humanitarian and should not be encouraged. Therefore, in my opinion, the article should not be published.