24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

mmqqxx

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 2835.9
散金: 608
红花: 7
帖子: 459
在线: 698.3小时
虫号: 594950
注册: 2008-09-07
专业: 控制论中的数学方法

[交流] 审稿意见还有戏吗？已有3人参与

Assoc. Editor Report:

Based on my perusal of this manuscript, I believe that this paper
cannot be further processed as a FULL paper for IEEE TAC, for the
following two reasons:

1. The paper language is substandard to the language expected for IEEE
TAC submissions. It seems that the paper has not been properly
proof-read. See, for instance, the title of the concluding section.
Similar problems exist in other parts of the paper, including the
references (e.g., "Word Congress" instead of "World Congress"

Letting
such problems lurking in the manuscript is a sign of disrespect for
your audience!

2. The two theorems presented in the paper are not sufficient to
justify a full paper, but they might be able to support a Technical
Note.

I recommend that you consider re-organizing the results into a
technical note, which, however, will also take care of all the
presentational problems mentioned above.

The revised submission will be first reviewed by myself, and if it is
found of appropriate quality, it will be sent out for a more extensive
review.

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

假如你的研究生提出不合理要求已经有4人回复
论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了已经有27人回复
所感已经有3人回复
要不要辞职读博？已经有7人回复
不自信的我已经有11人回复
北核录用已经有3人回复
实验室接单子已经有3人回复
磺酰氟产物，毕不了业了！已经有8人回复
求助:我三月中下旬出站，青基依托单位怎么办？已经有10人回复
26申博（荧光探针方向，有机合成）已经有4人回复

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

审稿人拒绝评审的稿子还有戏吗？已经有17人回复
这样的审稿意见是什么情况？有戏？已经有5人回复
中国科学 F辑英文稿-major revision 已经有44人回复
这篇稿子还有戏吗，是修改后再投，还是换个刊物？已经有20人回复
投稿三个月，编辑回信reviewer换人了，这论文还有戏吗？已经有22人回复
投了一篇文章，审稿结果是“major revision”，帮忙看看评审意见，有戏没？已经有32人回复
被一个审稿人提了9条意见，还有戏吗？已经有40人回复
投稿到Elsevier杂志未过技术审查，修改后再投还有戏吗？已经有15人回复
审稿意见，第一次投稿不知道还有没有戏？大家帮助看看，导师不管，没有人问已经有4人回复
这样的审稿意见有戏吗？已经有17人回复
这样的审稿意见还有戏码？已经有18人回复
Chinese Physics B审稿意见，有戏么？已经有23人回复

xnf

1楼 2010-12-30 22:49:01

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

chenlj8331

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 17 (小学生)
贵宾: 0.068
金币: 7131.2
散金: 50
红花: 6
沙发: 1
帖子: 943
在线: 1273.7小时
虫号: 613317
注册: 2008-09-26
专业: 高分子合成化学

★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流

引用回帖:

Originally posted by mmqqxx at 2010-12-30 22:49:01:
Assoc. Editor Report:

Based on my perusal of this manuscript, I believe that this paper
cannot be further processed as a FULL paper for IEEE TAC, for the
following two reasons:

1. The paper ...

拒掉了。但按照意见修改后，可以重投。