| 查看: 2576 | 回复: 21 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
主编意思含糊，大家帮着看一下是大修还是小修 已有11人参与
|
|||
|
第一次收到国外某SCI杂志的审稿意见，有点拿不准主编的意思，两个审稿人的意见分别是大修还是小修? 麻烦大家。附，主编是个日本人，会不会有民族情绪？ Dear Dr. XXX, Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript. Yours sincerely, 两个审稿人的意见： Reviewer #1: 前面是工作总结...I recommend this manuscript to be published after some revision. Comments: -Please compare XXX with Yyy of reference [19]. - No references to the latest literature. - Please ensure that the document is checked for spelling mistakes and format error. Reviewer #2: （没有工作总结） 1. Some examples should be complemented to illustrate the method of XXXXX. 2. Dose the method of XXXXX fits either YYYYYY or ZZZZZZ, please give some explanations. 3. What's the meaning of symbol XXX 3.1? 4. Dose the last sentence of definition 3.3 is necessary for this definition? 5. Should the definition 5.4 in the paper be a definition or a proposition? Please check it. 6. There also have some inappropriate English presentation in the paper, please correct them. [ Last edited by zjay_yvette1 on 2010-12-24 at 08:49 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
我不理解！
已经有19人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有16人回复
-
2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战
已经有10人回复
-
国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论
已经有4人回复
-
系统查不到
已经有10人回复
-
基金不中，共勉
已经有3人回复
-
怎么查啊
已经有5人回复
-
范进中举一文的中心思想
已经有10人回复
-
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有25人回复
-
2026年8月25日国自然放榜前突然收到列入评审专家邮件，有关系吗？
已经有28人回复
liwawa
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1166.9
- 散金: 5
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 176
- 在线: 136.4小时
- 虫号: 439572
- 注册: 2007-10-15
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 功能与智能高分子
22楼2010-12-24 11:56:17
2楼2010-12-24 08:54:01
3楼2010-12-24 08:57:22
4楼2010-12-24 08:59:15
