| 查看: 2247 | 回复: 21 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
主编意思含糊，大家帮着看一下是大修还是小修 已有11人参与
|
|||
|
第一次收到国外某SCI杂志的审稿意见，有点拿不准主编的意思，两个审稿人的意见分别是大修还是小修? 麻烦大家。附，主编是个日本人，会不会有民族情绪？ Dear Dr. XXX, Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript. Yours sincerely, 两个审稿人的意见： Reviewer #1: 前面是工作总结...I recommend this manuscript to be published after some revision. Comments: -Please compare XXX with Yyy of reference [19]. - No references to the latest literature. - Please ensure that the document is checked for spelling mistakes and format error. Reviewer #2: （没有工作总结） 1. Some examples should be complemented to illustrate the method of XXXXX. 2. Dose the method of XXXXX fits either YYYYYY or ZZZZZZ, please give some explanations. 3. What's the meaning of symbol XXX 3.1? 4. Dose the last sentence of definition 3.3 is necessary for this definition? 5. Should the definition 5.4 in the paper be a definition or a proposition? Please check it. 6. There also have some inappropriate English presentation in the paper, please correct them. [ Last edited by zjay_yvette1 on 2010-12-24 at 08:49 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
药学硕士，第一、第二作者已发表6 篇 SCI，药理方向及相关方向2026年/2027年博士申请
已经有6人回复
-
一篇MDPI论文改变了学习工作和生活
已经有5人回复
-
26年博士申请自荐-电催化
已经有3人回复
-
中国地质大学（北京）博士招生补录，数理学院材料科学与工程专业和材料与化工专业
已经有6人回复
-
收到国自然专家邀请后几年才会有本子送过来评
已经有4人回复
-
考博
已经有5人回复
-
26年申博自荐-计算机视觉
已经有4人回复
-
药化及相关博士的申请
已经有3人回复
17楼2010-12-24 10:36:53
2楼2010-12-24 08:54:01
3楼2010-12-24 08:57:22
4楼2010-12-24 08:59:15