应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 计算模拟区 » 计算模拟 » 【分享】Ab Initio Molecular Dynamic
31/1返回列表
查看: 747  |  回复: 2
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看

fegg7502

荣誉版主 (知名作家)

无

优秀版主

[交流] 【分享】Ab Initio Molecular Dynamic 已有2人参与

From CCl：

ask： I am interested in abinitio simulation,and I am really confused about
differences between vasp&  cpmd packages. Could anybody tell me what is the
main methodology s aspects between these two software? It is better to say
that if a job which is completed with vasp ,could be done with cpmd with same
results or not?(with same plane wave cutoff and same cell characteristic in
DFT and GGA with PW91 Basis set usages.)

Answer：
I would say that there two main differences between VASP and CPMD. First, of course, as afar as I know (I am not a Vasp expert) VASP does only Born-Oppenheimer Molecular Dynamics whereas CPMD does both BO-MD and CP-MD.
Second, VASP has been designed to treat metals and is good at this whereas Carr-Parrinello-MD is really difficult if you have a metal (or anything with a zero gap).
So, if you have a metallic system, I would recommend VASP. If not, then CPMD should be fine, and faster if you use CP-MD.
Another choice (beside CASTEP), is CP2K that is really fast for non metallic systems. I do not know how good it is for metallic systems as I do not use it.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
心诚意正，方可始终；身无苦灭，永登光明。
1楼 2010-12-14 08:51:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zzy870720z

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
了解了
只知道first不知道后几个
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
博学、审问、慎思、明辨、笃学
2楼2010-12-15 09:59:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

leepearson

木虫 (著名写手)
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
如果是VASP和CASTEP作对比，他们采用相同的参数，对金属材料会得到同样的模拟结果吗？
赞一下 回复此楼
3楼2018-07-10 16:11:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 fegg7502 的主题更新
31/1返回列表
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭