Reviewers have now commented on your paper. For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. Please give a careful consideration to the criticisms raised. All of them should be taken into account in a revised version of your manuscript. Please send your revised manuscript, together with an itemized letter answering all the comments made and describing all changes made in response, or the reason why no change should be made. Depending on the level of the answers and corrections made, your manuscript may need a second review by at least one of the referees.
If you think that you cannot submit a revised manuscript within 8 weeks from receipt of this message, or if you decide not to resubmit in light of the comments made, please let me know by e-mail.
Reviewer #1:
The submission stands its own point and should be considered for publication due to its novelty. However, some major issues have to be resolved:
Major concerns that authors should address:
^
^
Reviewer #2:
use of ¡¡l is an interesting idea. However, there are problems (discussed in detail in the following paragraphs) regarding the implementation.
^
^
ÌáÁË6Ò³µÄÐÞ¸ÄÒâ¼û£¬Í·ÌÛ°¡£¡´ó¼Ò¸øÐ©½¨Ò飡 |